BLOA - discuss 2 effects of environment on physiological processes Flashcards
brain
- dynamic system that interacts with the environment
- the brain can determine and change its own behaviour
- behaviour and environment can also change the brain
- neuroplasticity
effect of parental nurturing on brain
- nurturing environment increases size of hippocampus (Luby, 2012)
- enriched environment increases thickness of cerebral cortex (Rosenzweig and Bennett, 1972)
Luby (2012) - Aim
To investigate the effects nurturing mothers have on the brain development of their children
Luby (2012) - Method
- Experiment conducted with 92 mother-and-child pairs, with children aged 3-6 years
- They were left with a brightly-wrapped package that was not allowed to be opened until the mother finished filling out some forms; this was meant to copy the usual stressors of daily parenting
- Generally either one of the two things was observed:
- nurturing: mothers offered reassurance and support
- non-nurturing: mothers ignored/scolded the child - Researchers then divided them into two categories (participants were unaware of this)
- When the children were 7-10 years old, researchers used MRI to scan their brains
Luby (2012) - Findings
children with nurturing mothers had hippocampi 10% larger than children with non-nurturing mothers
Luby (2012) - Conclusion
nurturing mothers had a positive impact on the brain development of children
Luby (2012) - Evaluation
- not all variables controlled
- non-nurturing mothers may feed their child healthily
- the diet may impact brain development as well
Rosenzweig and Bennett (1972) - Aim
to investigate the effect of either enrichment or deprivation on the development of neurons in the cerebral cortex
Rosenzweig and Bennett (1972) - Process
- Placed rats in one of 2 conditions:
- environmentally enriched (e.g. giving interesting toys to play with)
- environmentally deprived (e.g. no interesting toys to play with) - Rats spent 60 days in their respective environments before being dissected
- The thickness of each rat’s frontal cortex was measured
Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond (1972) - Findings
- post-mortem studies showed that rats in the enriched condition had increased thickness in cerebral cortex
- the frontal lobe is associated with thinking, planning, and decision-making
- it was found to be heavier in enriched condition rats
Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond (1972) - Conclusion
- evidence of neuroplasticity due to environmental conditions
- having interesting toys created the best conditions for developing cerebral thickness of rat brains
Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond (1972) - Evaluation
- tightly controlled study with defined IV/DV
- animal study; caution should be used when generalizing to humans
- ethically followed the correct guidelines for treatment of animals
- rats were bred for experimental purposes and were used sparingly
neuroplasticity
- the brain’s ability to rearrange the connections between its neurons
- i.e. redistribute brain mass according to usage/necessity
- result of learning or experience
why does neuroplasticity occur?
- the brain is a dynamic system that interacts with the environment
- so the brain can both affect and be affected by behaviour and the environment
- Luby (2012): hippocampus is associated with memory and emotion, and a nurturing environment likely correlates to positive emotions
- Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond (1972): cerebral cortex is associated with thinking, planning, decision-making, all of which were exercised over the 60 days
- general conclusion of the two studies: a nurturing and stimulating environment aids brain development
what to write when asked “discuss 2 effects of environment on physiological processes”
- define neuroplasticity
- describe + explain the effects of a nurturing (Luby, 2012) and stimulating (Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond, 1972) environment on neuroplasticity
- include background info/reasons for every point
- explain why neuroplasticity occurs in the context of those environments
discuss:
- give a balanced review with a focus on EXPLAINING EFFECTS rather than EVALUATIONS
- state your opinions and give evidence to support them
- evaluate all empirical evidence cited (e.g. methodology, ethnics, extent of generalization the results can have)
- discuss the usefulness of the findings: mention possible applications and how effective + universal these applications are