CLOA - ethical considerations related to CLOA research Flashcards
ethical considerations in CLOA
- use of animals in research
- use of non-invasive techniques
- informed consent
- comfort
- anonymity
why are animals used?
- less moral obligation involved
- can test some aspects that would be otherwise highly unethical to test in humans
cited study: Clark et al. (2009)
guidelines followed in use of animals
- refinement
- replacement
- reduction
guidelines followed in use of animals: refinement
- animal research should be as focused as possible
- must be realistic + achievable aims with regard to expansion of information about that species
guidelines followed in use of animals: replacement
- researchers should consider all options
- should always look for non-animal methods of investigation
guidelines followed in use of animals: reduction
expose as few animals to pain, suffering, and distress as possible
animal studies: how did the study chosen follow ethical considerations?
Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond (1972):
- ethical issue against ‘reduction’ guideline: animals were killed for the sake of the experiment
- followed ‘refinement’ guideline: results helped us understand how environmental factors affect neuroplasticity
conclusion: can be argued that the research was justified in spite of ethical issues
informed consent
- should always be sought after when possible
- some studies (e.g. Sacks, 2007) can’t request informed consent as certain subjects (e.g. Clive Wearing) could not comprehend the nature of the experiment
- therefore could not give informed consent
- but family members/guardians/etc can give consent by proxy
informed consent: how did the study chosen follow ethical considerations?
- Clive Wearing was not able to remember participating in research so it could be argued that it was unethical
- however, the findings are significant – this justifies it
confidentiality issues
- with case studies, there is higher risk of participants’ anonymity being compromised due to the depth of info obtained and the possible uniqueness of their case
- hence the researcher may need to take extra steps to protect their identity
Study: Sacks (2007)
comfort issues
- the researcher should prioritize participants’ comfort over any potential information gain
Study: Loftus et al. (1987)
comfort: how did the study chosen follow ethical considerations?
- Loftus et al. (1987) involved staging criminal activity around the participant
- potentially upsetting
non-invasive methods of investigation
- non-invasive techniques cause no harm to subjects
- yet can still give valuable insights
cited study: Maguire et al. (2000)