Relationships - Discuss effectiveness of two strategies for reducing violence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

anti-violence strategies

A
  • Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme (OBPP)

- Metropolitan Area Child Study (MACS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme (OBPP)

A
  • programme includes everyone involved in the school system (parents, teachers, students, etc)
  • aims to change the school environment as a whole, while specifically targeting individual students
  • teachers are trained by the program to recognize and deal with bullying as well as implement cooperative learning strategies in the classroom
  • students’ playgrounds and lunchroom are supervised
  • aims to identify specific people (the bullies) and help them and their victims
  • adults act as positive role models

studies: Olweus (1993), Black (2007)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Olweus (1993)

A
  • longitudinal study in Norway
  • sample was made up of students in grades 5-8
  • data was collected via observations and questionnaires
  • after 2 years, 50% reduction in selfƒ-reported bullying incidents and general improvement toƒ the social climate ofƒ the classes
  • student selfƒ-reports showed higher satisfƒaction with school life, improved order and discipline, more positive social relationships, and a more positive attitude towards the school
  • indicates high level of effectiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Black (2007)

A
  • 13 inner city schools participated in a 4-year OBPP but only 9 schools actually completed it
  • noted that not all schools followed the programme as intended (average fidelity was only 48%)
  • observed bullying decreased 25%
  • may be due to the increased supervision recommended by OBPP
  • strangely,‚ selfƒ-reported bullying incidents increased over the course of the programme
  • Black (2007) argues that the mixed results could be due to less rigorous implementation, lack ofƒ resources, and cultural differences between Norway and USA
  • Norway prizes social responsibility
  • whereas American culture prizesƒ individual independence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Metropolitan Area Child Study (MACS)

A

consists of:

  • classroom programme: focuses on empathy training and social problem-solving skills
  • training in social skills: small group sessions where students meet and discuss peer relations and social problem-solving strategies
  • family counselling: meeting with multiple families that start with lessons and then ƒproceed to discussions about family-specific problems

Studies: MACS group (2002), Guerra et al. (2006)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MACS group (2002)

A

MACS Research Group (2002)
- longitudinal , quasi-experimental field study on elementary school students in USA
- most participants were ethnic minorities and and many were poor
- schools were divided into 4 conditions:
 1 . control group (no intervention)
 2 . ƒfull programme
 3. only classroom programme
 4. the classroom programme and social skills training
- found that the programme had negligible effect on levels of aggression in most cases
- positive effect: some students who had participated in the full programme showed less aggression compared to control group
- negative effect: students whose schools didn’t do the full program actually showed a higher level of aggression after the programme compared to the control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

evaluation of MACS group (2002)

A

Guerra et al. (2006):

  • noted that students of selected schools were unusually high-risk in terms of aggression, and the students’ social hierarchy had been largely decided violently
  • the hierarchy was ingrained to such an extent that the culture of violence would be difficult to address – intervention programs would not have had much effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

are school bullying intervention programs effective?

A
  • appears that school-based strategies to reduce violence are not always very effective
  • possibly because violence i s a complex phenomenon that must be addressed at social, cultural, individual, and
    socioeconomic levels
  • Guerra et al (2006): different approaches may need to be used for different target groups
  • Ferguson et al. (2007) performed a meta-analysis of effectiveness of school-based anti-bullying programmes
    and found that overall they were not very effective
  • should be noted that the younger the target groups, the more impact the programmes had
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly