roman imperialism Flashcards
unit 3
How can populares and optimates best be defined? While both types of politicians were elite Romans from traditional patrician families, what best distinguished them from each other?
THESE ARE INFORMAL POLITICAL DIVSIONS that are best distinguished by how they went about obtaining power.
1. Populares; popular-leaning politicians
- rose to power through innovative means; often through the tribunate and tribunitian power
2. Optimates; elite-leaning politicians
- rose to power through traditional means; i.e. the cursus honorum and the senate
What were some of the causes of the Roman Republic’s disintegration?
- empire ruling over distant provinces
- imbalance of power for both the citizens and those in government (rich v. poor, generals acquired more power than the senate)
Who is Tiberius Gracchus? What are notable aspects of his reign?
He was a tribune of the plebs that fought for popular
reform in the late 2nd
century.
1. He wanted to redistribute public land in Italy that had been cultivated by elite Roman’s
2. He placed this bill before the concilium plebus without gaining permission from the senators.
- A group of senators beat
him to death in response to this
Who is Gaius Gracchus? What are notable aspects of his reign?
Tiberius Gracchus’ younger brother, he became tribune and pushed for several popular reforms.
1. most popular reform - A bill that subsidized grain for the urban poor
2. The Senate decreed martial law in response to this bill and killed him
Who is Marius? What are notable aspects of his reign?
Gaius Marius was a novus homo that rose to power because of military skill.
- He had campaigned successfully in Africa, Germany, and the east
1. His reforms to the army shifted soldier loyalty from the state to their general
- Because of this reform he took control of Rome,
- stood for multiple consulships,
- held consulships back to back,
- and marched on Rome with his army (setting an important precedent)
Who is Sulla? What are notable aspects of his reign?
Lucius Cornelius Sulla, successful general and optimate politician.
1. His career was aimed at restoring the domination of the traditional upper class
- He solidified his hold through proscriptions
- When he became dictator he tried to reestablish the power of the Senate over Roman government (unsuccessful)
What kinds of benefits did the empire bring to the Romans?
BENEFICIAL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL - specifically generals
1. Could acquire immense wealth and power from their provinces
2. Soldiers could also gain wealth and were promised land upon discharge
What were the downfalls that the empire brought to the Roman’s?
PROBLEMS FOR BOTH THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE EMPIRE AS A WHOLE
1. a challenge for the empire to rule over distant provinces
- imbalance of power (triumphant generals acquired more power than their peers in the Senate)
- for the individuals, divisions between the poor and the rich were exacerbated
Was the empire overall beneficial or harmful towards to the Roman people?
Overall, the empire resulted in a more parasitic relationship with the common people imo.
- the empire amassed immense wealth and power
BUT
- the wealth and power acquired was not allocated fairly (i.e. the common people saw this imbalance in power and opportunity which fed into increasing dissatisfaction within the empire; destabilizing it
Which major event occurred that allowed for unconstitutional action in the late Roman Republic?
SULLA felt a need to uphold his dignitas after Marius was granted the Mithridates campaign, and used his army to have the senate reinstate his command.
After the 2nd Punic War, Rome obtained lots of foreign territories and in need of more commanders, Rome extended the terms of elected magistrates through a process of prorogation. What were some aspects of the magistrates who were granted prorogation?
- Power was absolute (i.e. no colleague to oppose them and the senate was too far away)
- This was a new implementation so there were no set
of rules regarding the proper behavior of these magistrates
- a charge of mismanagement could be brought but was unlikely - Corruption and extortion were common practices (they were even almost expected)
- Governors could gain material wealth and glory as military commanders
- achieved through successful wars and quelling revolts of local provinces
The increasing wealth of Rome also served to increase the wealth gap between the Roman elite and small farmers, why?
THE SMALL FARMERS WERE THE ARMY
- an increase in wars fought outside of Italy meant that farmers would not be able to attend to their families or crops for extended periods of time
- this forced many families to sell their land and move into the urban city
- the land was then bought by rich neighbors who would create vast estates and have them worked by slave labor, essentially cutting out these smaller farmers completely
Describe the short but impactful political career of Tiberius Gracchus.
- 133 BCE Was elected tribune of the plebs and introduced an agrarian bill, but did not consult the senate before presenting the bill (uh oh)
- A tribune favoring patrician’s vetoed the bill, Tiberius then called for a vote to remove the vetoing tribune from office
- he also announced intentions for reelection for tribunate - BOOM. a group of senators and their supporters beat Tiberius to death (crazy cuz he was sacrosanct)
Describe the short but impactful political career of Gaius Gracchus.
- 123-122 BCE Elected tribune and pushed through a series of bills meant to alleviate problems of the poor.
- In response, the senate issued a “senatus consultum ultimum” declaring a state of martial law
- Consul Opimius and senate supporters cornered
Gaius and his men, and pushed for Gaius to commit suicide
What was the bill that Tiberius Gracchus presented without consulting the Senate?
AN AGRARIAN BILL: would confiscate the public land being illegally used by larger estates and redistribute it to the urban poor.