Reserach Methods- Topic 7 (Paper1) Flashcards
Explain the difference between registration and official surveys as ways of collecting official statistics.
Registration- the mae requires parents to register births.
Official surveys- such as the census or the General Househukf Survey.
3 practical advantages of official statistics.
1) They are a free source of huge amounts of data.
2) Statistics allow comparisons between groups.
3) Officak statistics are collected at regular intervals, they show trends and patterns overtime.
3 practical disadvantages of official statistics.
1) The government collects statistics for its own purpose and not for the benefit of sociologists.
2) The definitions that the state use may be different from the ones a sociologist would use.
3) If definitions change over time, it may make comparisons difficult.
State one reason why offical statistics are often highly representative.
Official statistics often cover very large numbers and care is taken with sampling procedures.
Why are offical statistics likely to be reliable?
They are complied in a standardised way he trained staff, following set procedures.
Give 4 reasons why positivists might favour using offical statistics in their research.
1) They provide reliable belief.
2) They are collected at regular intervals.
3) They provide quantitative data.
4) They’re usually large scale and thus very representative.
Why might interpretivists reject offical statistics?
Social construct and not social facts.
They fail to achieve the main interpretivist goal of validity.
Hard statistics
Some ‘hard’ official statistics do succeed in doing this.
Soft statistics
They give a much less valid picture.
Public documents.
These are produced by organisations such as government departments, schools, welfare agencies, businesses and charities.
Personal documents.
These are first-person accounts of social events and personal experiences and they generally also include the writers feelings and attitudes.
Historical documents.
It’s simply a personal or public document created in the past.
Authenticity according to Scott’s 4 criteria for assessing documents.
Is the document what it claims to be?
For example, the so-called ‘Hilted Diaries’ were later proven to be fake.
Credibility according to Scott’s 4 criteria for assessing documents.
Politicians may write diaries intended for publication that inflate their own importance.
Representativeness according to Scott’s 4 criteria for assessing documents.
Is the evidence in the document typical? If we cannot answer this question, we cannot know whether it’s safe to generalised.