research methods: validity Flashcards

1
Q

What is validity?

A

The extent to which an observed effect is genuine and represents what is actually ‘out there’ in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can data be reliable but not valid?

A

E.g. if a test that claims to measure IQ may produce the same results every time but not measure true intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is internal validity?

A

Questions the cause and effect relationship between the change the researcher made to the independent variable and the observed change in the dependent variable
- not influenced by other variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What largely determines the internal validity of a study?

A

The quality of the study’s experimental design and method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an example of something effecting internal validity?

A

Social desirability bias: Participants hide their genuine opinions/behaviours and instead act in a more socially acceptable way to ‘look good’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How can demand characteristics effect internal validity?

A

Participants think they have discovered the aim and behave in a way they believe will produce results supporting the researcher’s theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is external validity?

A

Questions if the findings of a study can be generalised beyond the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is ecological validity?

A

The extent to which the findings of any particular study can be generalised beyond the experimental setting to ‘real life’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is mundane realism?

A

The extent to which the task used in an experimental set-up are similar to the stimuli experienced in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is temporal validity?

A

The extent to which findings can be generalised to other historical times and eras

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is population validity?

A

The extent to which the same used in the study is representative of the target population/ wider population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can validity be assessed?

A
  • face validity
  • concurrent validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is face validity?

A

Does the test measure what it claims to be measuring?
- known as criterion validity -> confidence in the validity of a test increases if we can compare the data from a test to another measure of the same variable and identify a correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is concurrent validity?

A

The extent to which data from the newly created test is similar to an established test of the same variable conducted at the same time
- correlation should exceed +0.80 for high concurrent validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can validity be improved in experiments?

A
  • using a control group so the researcher is more confident that changes in the DV were due to the effect of the IV
  • standardised procedures minimise the effects of extraneous variables and investigator effects
  • in a single-blind procedure, participants are not aware of the aims of the study until they have taken part to reduce demand characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can validity be improved in questionnaires?

A
  • lie scales to control for social desirability bias
  • telling participants that data is confidential so they are more likely to tell the truth
17
Q

How can validity be improved in observations?

A
  • behavioural categories that are well-defined, operationalised and not ambiguous or overlapping
  • triangulation: using a number of different sources as evidence e.g. interviews, observation