research methods overview Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define aim

A
  • doesn’t make a prediction but instead it states what is it that we want to look at.
  • it is a statement of what the researcher intends to find out in a research study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is a directional hypothesis

A
  • indicates the direction of the prediction

- e.g. ‘music will negatively effect recall’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a non-directional hypothesis

A
  • states something is going to happen but not the direction of the prediction.
  • e.g. ‘there will be a difference in recall between the music and no music condition’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is a null hypothesis

A

-predicts that there will be no difference, only difference is just due to chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

independent variable

A
  • the thing the researcher is able to manipulate between the different conditions
  • the thing that is changed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

dependent variable

A

-the thing that is measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how do you operationalise hypotheses/IV’s/DV’s . How do you make it measurable ?

A

ask yourself can I count this easily? If the answer is no then it is not operationalised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

situational variables

A
  • things to do with the situation
  • e.g. lighting, instructions, time of day.
  • overcome by standardisation (making everything the same for all conditions)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

participant variables

A
  • things to do with the participants
  • e.g. age, Intelligence, gender, personality
  • overcome by random allocation or measured/matched participants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the two extraneous variables

A

situational variables

participant variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

confounding variable

A

a type of IV that varies systematically between conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

investigator effects

A

-an experimenter may accidentally give cues to make partisans respond in a certain way

  • can be over come by;
    1. using standardised instructions to stop the experimenter leading the participant.
    2. using a double blind technique where both the participants and the experimenter don’t know the aim of the experiment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

independent measures

A

-group of participants, split them in half. Half of the participants do the first condition of the IV and the second half do the 2nd condition of the IV. Compare the performance of both groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

evaluation of independent measures

A

advantage = you don’t get order effect as participants are only doing one condition of the IV so they don’t get use to what’s happening.

disadvantage =no control of participant variables and you need twice as many participants

overcoming these problems = random allocation of participants which theoretically distributes participant variables evenly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

repeated measures

A

-group of participants take part in all levels of the IV. Same participants in all conditions of the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

evaluation of repeated measures

A

Advantage = fewer participants. No individual differences as participants are taking part in all conditions of the IV

Disadvantage = you might get an order effect. Participants may do better on 2nd test due to practice effect. May guess experiment purpose and change their behaviour.

overcoming these problems = use 2 different tests to reduce practice effect. Counterbalancing can be used to deal with order effect- cover story can be presented to the participants about the purpose of the test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

matched Paris design

A
  • 2 groups of participants but match them on key characteristics believed to effect performance on the DV
  • 1 member of pair is allocated to group a and the other group b. Procedure is then the same for independent groups.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

evaluation of matched pairs design

A

advantages = controls some participant variables, participants won’t guess the studies aim. As a result of having different participants for each condition there is no order effect.

disadvantages = achieving matched pairs is difficult and time consuming. May not control all participant variables

overcoming these problems = restrict the no. of variables to the matched one. A pilot study to show key variables that need to be matched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

random sampling

A
  • everyone in the target population has an equal chance of being selected.
  • can be done through generating random numbers of simply picking names out of a hat.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

opportunity sample

A

-people who are available at the time the study is carried out. e.g. people in the common room.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

volunteer sample

A

-participants are recruited for through an advert, newspaper, Internet etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

systematic sample

A
  • a system is used to select participants e.g. every 4th person to leave the canteen. The numerical interval is applied consistently.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

stratified sampling

A
  • subgroups within the population are identified e.g. gender.
  • participants are obtained from each of the subgroups in proportion to their occurrence in the population
  • selection from the strata is done using a random technique
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of random sampling

A
strength = least biased 
weakness = difficult to achieve in practice as target population could be huge so time consuming
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of volunteer sampling

A
strength = gives access to a variety of participants 
weakness = tends to be a certain type of person that volunteers. e.g. highly motivated, so could be biased
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of opportunity sampling

A

strength = easy and less time consuming to allocate sample

weakness = biased as sample is drawn from a small part of the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of stratified sampling

A
strength = less biased as proportional and randomly selected representation of subgroups 
weakness = time consuming to identify subgroups and then randomly select participants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

1 advantage and 1 disadvantage of systemic sampling

A
advantage = unbiased as participants are selected using an objective system 
weakness = not truly unbiased unless you select a number using a random method and start with this person and then selected every nth person.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

lab experiment

A
  • involves manipulation of IV whilst trying to keep all other variables content.
  • participants are aware they are taking part in an experiment but may be unsure of the true aims of the study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

field experiment

A
  • the IV is manipulated in a natural setting e.g on a train

- participants are often unaware that they are taking part in the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

natural experiment

A
  • study in which a naturally occurring IV is investigated
  • the IV is not deliberately manipulated by the researcher
  • generally used when it’s not possible/practical ethically to manipulate the IV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Quasi experiment

A
  • IV is naturally occurring
  • DV can be measured in a lab
  • key feature is that the IV isn’t actually ‘manipulated’ or made to vary by anyone-it is simply a difference that exists.
  • e.g, gender as the IV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

naturalistic observation

A
  • carried out in everyday setting

- investigator doesn’t interfere in any way but just observes the behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

controlled observation

A

-behaviour is observed but under conditions where certain variables have been organised by the researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

overt observation

A

participants are aware that their behaviour is being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

covert observation

A

observing people without their knowledge

37
Q

participant observation

A

observations made by someone who is also participating in the activity being observed

38
Q

non participant observation

A

the observer is separate from the people being observed

39
Q

unstructured observation

A
  • researcher records all relevant behaviours but has no system
  • problem is that there may be too much to record and the behaviours recorded will often be those which are most visible
40
Q

structured observation

A
  • likely to use behavioural categories (operationalised behaviours that you are likely to see)
  • tally each time you sport these behaviours
41
Q

behavioural categories

A
  • e.g. when observing infant behaviour, we can have a lost including things like smiling, crying, sleeping etc
  • behavioural categories should be objective, cover all possible component behaviours and be mutually exclusive.
42
Q

sampling procedures

A

event sampling= counting the number of times a certain behaviour occurs in a target individual/individuals

time sampling = recording behaviours in a given time frame. e.g. noting what a target individual is doing every 30 seconds

43
Q

structured interview and evaluation

A

pre determined questions

strength = easily be repeated as the questions are standardised so answers from different people can be compared and it is easier to analyse

weakness = comparability may be a problem if the same interviewer behaves differently on different occasions. Low reliability

44
Q

unstructured interview and evaluation

A

starts off with general aims but the interviewee’s answer quint subsequent questions

strength = provides more detail

weakness = require interviewers with more skill as they have to develop questions of the spot

45
Q

two types of questionnaires

A
open questions (qualitative data) 
closed questions (quantative data)
46
Q

two strengths of questionnaires

A
  • sample a lot of people in a short space of time as researcher doesn’t need to be there
  • doesn’t produce investigator effect
47
Q

1 weakness of questionnaire

A
  • some groups in society that can’t answer questionnaires -those who can’t read or write
  • sample is therefore biased
48
Q

correlation co-efficient

A

a numbers cal measure of some type of correlation, meaning a relationship between two variables

49
Q

3 strengths of correlations

A
  • can allow us to study naturally occurring variables
  • can measure things we can’t experimentally (due to ethics)
  • can suggest patterns which then lead to experiments
50
Q

2 weaknesses of correlations

A
  • just because there is a relationship it doesn’t necessarily mean a cause and effect relationship
  • may be a third intervening variable that is responsible for the relationship
51
Q

case study

A

an in-depth investigation, often of a single individual. They are often longitudinal (over time)

52
Q

3 strengths of case studies

A
  • give very detailed information
  • can be used to investigate very rare behaviours
  • interaction of many different things
53
Q

4 weaknesses of case studies

A
  • each case is unique so can’t be generalised
  • may have to recall past (introspective recall). Not reliable
  • bias of researcher
  • problems of confidentiality due to personal information
54
Q

what are the three measures of central tendency

A

mean
median
mode

55
Q

advantage and disadvantage of mean

A

advantage = most useful as it is made up of all of the values in the data set

disadvantage = sometimes produces a value that can’t work with certain data. e.g. 2.4 children

56
Q

advantage and disadvantage of median

A

advantage = less effect by extreme scores than the mean

disadvantage = not very useful on smaller data sets

57
Q

advantage and disadvantage of mode

A

advantage = can be used for categorical data

disadvantage = useless if you have lots of modes within the data

58
Q

primary data

A
  • first hand

- collected directly by researcher for that study

59
Q

secondary data

A
  • second hand

- data originally collected for another purpose other than the current one

60
Q

internal validity

A

does the research measure what it intends to measure ?

61
Q

external validity

A

the extent to which the findings can be generalised

62
Q

population validity

A

how results cans be generalised to other groups of people

63
Q

ecological validity

A

if it reflects real life

64
Q

time validity

A

if results can be generalised to other time periods

65
Q

external reliability

A
  • whether a experiment measures consistently over time/people
  • e.g. an IQ test on Monday should produce the same results a week later if it has external reliability
66
Q

internal reliability

A
  • whether an experiment is consistent within itself

- e.g. scales should measure the same weight between 50 and 100g and 150 and 200g

67
Q

when to use a sign test

A
  • when looking at paired or related data
  • the 2 pieces of data could come from a repeated measures design, I.e. the same person is tested twice.
  • can be used in matched pairs design as participants are paired and count as 1 person tested twice
68
Q

how to do a sign test

A
  • state hypothesis. Directional means one-tailed test, non directional means two-tailed test.
  • record the data and work out the sign (either + or -)
  • find calculated value. Add up pluses, add up minus and select smaller value. E.g. if there are 3 minus which is the less frequent sign then S = 3. This is the calculated value
  • find critical value of S. N = total no. of scores ( not including any zeros). E.g. one-tailed test is used. Use table of critical values. Locate the column headed 0.05 and the row which begins with N value.
  • check result is in the right direction
69
Q

Quantative

A

represents behaviour in numbers

70
Q

Qualitative

A

descriptive data that represents the quality of something

71
Q

how to turn qualitative into quantitative

A

place into categories then count up

72
Q

bar charts

A
  • height of each bar represents the frequency of each item

- space left between each bar

73
Q

histogram

A
  • the area within the bars must be proportional to the frequencies represented.
  • no gaps between bars
74
Q

normal distribution

A
  • bell shapes curve
  • it is the predicted distribution when considering an equally likely set of results
  • mean, median and mode are all in the exact mid point
  • the distribution is symmetrical
  • the dispersion of scores either side of the mid point is consistent and can be expressed in SD
75
Q

skewed distribution

A

-when there is a number of extreme values to one side or the other of the mid point

76
Q

negative skewed distribution

A

most of the scores are bunched towards the right

77
Q

positive skewed distribution

A

most of the scores are bunch towards the left

78
Q

what are the 6 ethical issues

A
P = privacy 
C = confidentiality 
D = deception
R = right to withdraw 
I = informed consent 
P = protection from harm
79
Q

informed consent

A
  • from the researchers point of view it means revealing the true aims of the study.
  • from the participants point of view they should be told what they will be required to do so the can make an informed decision about whether they want to take part
  • to deal with it particles ta have to sign a document which contains info about the nature and purpose of the experiment
80
Q

deception

A

-from the researchers point of view it can be necessary to deceive participants about true aims of study otherwise participants may alter their behaviour.

-from the participants point of view it is unethical as researcher
.should not deceive anyone without good cause. Deception prevents participants being able to give informed consent.

-to deal with it participants should be fully debriefed afterwards

81
Q

the right to withdraw

A
  • from the researchers point of view if participants leave then this will make the findings biased as those who stay are likely to be more obedient.
  • from the participants point of view if they feel uncomfortable then they should be able to withdraw themselves. Especially important if participant has been deceived about aims.
  • to deal with it participants should be informed at the beginning of the study that they have the right to leave.
82
Q

protection from physical and psychological harm

A
  • from researchers point of view studying some of the more important questions in psychology may involve a aspect of distress in participants.
  • from participants point of view nothing should happen in a study to cause them harm.
  • to deal with it avoid any risks greater than experienced in everyday life
83
Q

confidentiality

A
  • from researchers point of view it may by difficult to protect confidentially as they will want to publish findings.
  • from the participants point of view the data protection act makes confidentiality a legal right
  • to deal with it researcher should not record any names of participants but instead use fake names or numbers
84
Q

privacy

A
  • from researchers point of it it may be difficult to avoid invasion of privacy when studying participants without their awareness like in a field experiment
  • from participants point of view they do not expect to be observed by others in certain situations like in the privacy of their own homes
  • to deal with this researcher shouldn’t study anyone without their consent unless it is in a public place and public behaviour
85
Q

2 examples of how psychology has been used in the economy

A

memory: cognitive interview used to reduce crime by catching the correct criminals

social influence: reducing smoking and alcoholism, so costing NHS less

86
Q

purpose of peer review

A
  • allocation of research funding
  • publication of research in journal articles
  • assessing the research rating of university departments
87
Q

issues in peer review

A
  • finding an expert
  • anonymity
  • publication bias
  • preserving the status quo
88
Q

How do you know what the value of s is when calculating the sign test

A

S is the total for the least frequently occurring sign