Research and Program Evaluation Flashcards
cohen’s d effect size
(ES): used to gauge how strong a relationship exists
Kurt Lewins concept of action research
goes beyond advancing knowledge and works to improve situation. Bridges gap between research and application.
experiement
most valuable type of research, used to discover cause and effect. Must have treatment controlled via experimenter and random assignments used in groups.
quasi experiment
researcher uses pre-existing groups, so ind variable cannot be altered. Cannot state with any degree of stat confidence that the ind variable caused dep variable
ex post factor study
“after the fact”. Correlational study using pre-exisiting groups.
Internal validity: whether depp variable (DV) were truly influenced by experimental ind variables (IV).
external validity
whether the experimental research results can be generalized to larger populations (i.e. other ppl, settings, conditions)
factor analysis
stat procedure htat uses important or underlying factors in an attempt to summarize a lot o variables. Ex: a test that measures a counselors ability using 3 most imp variables or factors that make an effective helper even though there are hundreds of factors that might exist.
chi square
stat measure that tests whether an actual distr. Differs sig. From expected theoretical dist
parsimony
interpreting results in simplest way. Strive for parsimony in research (looking for least complex explanation)
occams razor
experimenters will interpret results in simplest manner (interchangable with parsimony)
conway lloyd morgan
english psychologys, physiologist. Created principle of economy in 1894 cannon
william of occam
14th cent. Philosopher, early behaviorists adhere closely to occams razor
bubbles
refers to flaws in research
contaminating variable
variable that enters experiment that is not being controlled by researcher (aka confounding variable)
basic research
research conducted to advance understanding of theory
appplied research
aka action research or experience-near research. Conducted to advance knowledge of how theories skills techniques can be used in practical application.
variable
behavior or circumstance that can exist on at least 2 levels or conditions. Factor that varies or is capable of change.
ind var IV
var. That researcher manipulates or wishes to experiment with
dep var. DV
expresses outcome of data
discrete var
categories
continuous var.
has range
causal comparitive design
true experiment apart that the groups were not randomly assigned.
code of ethics for researchers
inform subjects of risks, remove negative after effects from research, allow subjects to withdraw at any point, protect confidentiality, present results in accurate and not misleading format, should only use techniques you are trained in.
control group
do not receive IV
experimental group
does receive IV
true experiment
need at least 30 subjects for correlational study and 100 subjects for survey.
organismic IV
a variable in which researcher cannot control yet exists such as height weight or gender.hy
hypothesis testing
Assoc. With work of RA Fisher. statement with can be tests regarding relationship of IV and DV.
null hyp
will not be sig. Difference between exper. Group and control group
exper hyp
a difference is evident between control group and experimental group. Aka affirmative hypothesis/alternative hypothesis.
corelational research
does not use IV. just comparing 2 things that already exist.
descriptive stat
describe data such as mean medium mode
inferential stat
infer something about pop.
percentile rank
descriptive stat that tells counselor what % of cases fell below a certain level (don’t confuse with percentage scores)
percentage scores
another way of stating raw score
test of significance
test used to determine whether difference in groups scores are significant or just due to chance.
t test
test of stat significance used when an experiment or study is measuring the difference between 2 groups
ind group comparison design
study in which 2 groups are ind. Of each other in that 1 group doesnt influence the other group
repeated measures comparison design
if researcher measures same group without IV and then with IV. aka between subjects design.
P (in test for significance)
Probability. The lower the number, the more that chance factors are rules out.
Parameter
a value obtained from a population
Statistic
a value drawn from a sample
Correlation coefficient
the degree or magnitude of relationship between two variables. Abbreviated using r. Makes a statement regarding the association of two variables and how a change in one is related to the change in another. Range from 0.00 to 1.0. A positive correlation is not stronger. The minus sign describes that as one goes up the other goes down.
Positive correlation
both variables change in same direction
Negative correlation
Inverse association of variables
Biserial correlation
one variable continuous and other is dichotomous
Level of significance synonyms
alpha level, probability, confidence level, cutoff point or “where one draws the line”
Accepted level of significance/alpha level/probability/or confidence level in social science
0.05 or lower
When setting alpha
very stringent alpha is best and larger sample size helps reduce chances for error. More stringent alpha decreases alpha errors but increase beta error
p=0.05 means
5% chance that the difference between control and experimental group is due to chance factors. Aka 95% confidence interval. Differences truly exist, the experiment will obtain the same results 99 times out of 100.
Type 1 error
alpha error. Researcher rejects null hypothesis when it’s true.
Type 2 error
beta error. Researcher accepts null hypothesis when it’s false.
Probability of committing type 1 error
the level of significance
1 minus beta
the power of a statistical test
Power (in statistical testing)
connotes a statistical test’s ability to reject correctly a false null hypothesis. Parametric tests have more power than nonparametric statistical tests.
Parametric test
used only with interval and ratio data
Type I Type II relationship
seesaw (when one goes up, the other goes down)
Increasing sample size
will reduce type I and type II errors. Differences revealed using larger sample sizes are more likely to be genuine.
t test
testing for sig. difference between two sample groups. `
ANOVA
analysis of variance. Used for testing sig. Difference between more than two groups. Yields an f statistic. Table consulted to find critical value of f. If f obtained is higher than that in the table, the null hypothesis is rejected. (one way analysis of variance)
Two-way ANOVA
testing two independent variables
MANOVA
multivariate analysis of variance for when a study has more than one DV
ANCOVA
analysis of covariance. Tests two or more groups while controlling for extraneous values called covariants.more powerful than anova. Ancova helps take out covariates. extraneous values called covariants.