reading 3 (ch. 4 and 13) Flashcards
political culture
- definition
- key features
the relationship that communities have with politics and government: what members of the communities expect of gov. + what they regard as normal and abnormal + how they define the purposes of gov.
key features =
- limits: not always generalizable (often subcultures in communities, so NOT: one country, one pol.cult.)
- measurement = hard to identify or quantify
- changeabiity = culture isn’t static
- complexity = multiple cultures rather than universal cultures
political culture comes close to ‘mentalities’: ways of thinking and feeling, more emotional than rational (Linz)
civic culture
- Almond and Verba 1960s
specific form of political culture where most citizens accept the authority of the state and believe in civic participation + includes expectation of fair government, talking freely about politics, tolerance towards opposition and civic cooperation and trust
= the ideal when it comes to how democracies should work
Almond & Verba: ideal conditions for democracy are combination participant culture + low levels of participation (people can act when needed)
elite political culture
challenges to the idea of a dominant national political culture
much of what we associate with a society is not a dominant pol.cult., but actually elite pol. cult.
challenges to the idea of dominant national pol.cult. =
- multiculturalism
1. identity (encourages societies to recognize diversity)
*can also be used by members perceived elite pol.cult. to divide
2. globalization (emphasizes commonalities, but also challenges traditional identities, making them reacting/changing to each other)
post-Materialism
Ronald Inglehart
= concept to distinguish old materialist interest in eco growth and security (pre 1970s) from the new focus on quality-of-life issues such as environmental protection, nuclear disarmament, gender equality, and freedom of expression
shift = silent revolution due to affluence, peace and security Western political structures
*is a type of pol. cult.
from cultures to civilizations
Huntington: cultures rather than countries would become the leading source of political conflict 21st century + end of cold war would mean shift in focus from a battle of ideologies to a clash of civilizations -> pol. cult. has escaped national moorings to embrace wider identities
identified 7 or 8 civilizations with contradictory worldviews with little room for compromise
!this thesis was widely criticized: where do we see these grand clashes + criticism portrayal of permanent conflict western and islam (+defining these two as homogenous)
(Inglehart-Welzel cultural map of the world)
example of global-scale analysis of pol.cult.
2 dimensional graph with countries plotted based on 2 scales:
- traditional (emphasizes religion) to secular-rational
- survival (eco. and physical security) to self-expression (post-materialism)
based on this they made a division of the world based on 9 types (= criticized for being an based on an uncomfortable combination of religion, geography and language for the grouping of his 9 types)
political trust
belief that government and political systems made competent decisions + that government works for the general good of society
- high in the 60s, since 90s it has been falling (not just in western democracies)
Edelman research findings trust (in gov., business, media, non-gov. org):
- big influence = income inequality
- people worry about being left behind + losing respect and dignity
- people worry about losing jobs
- worry about rapid changes technology
- worry about contamination of media with information that could not be trusted
- gov. was seen as least competent and ethical
political culture in authoritarian regimes
- example
- e.g. Syria, Russia
Khatib: ruling elites Arab world often insist that they are the state and that their continuation in power is essential to the stability of the state
!little research on pol. cult. in auth. regimes
broad difference democratic and authoritarian regimes may be:
- Democratic = pluralistic civic culture with emphasis on self-expression (Verba and Almond)
- Authoritarian = cultural emphasis among their populations on security (Welzel and Inglehart, they also argue that if democracy arises it may be unstable: there are no/little democrats)
people tend to admire strong leadership (e.g. Russia ‘burden of history’: people remember ‘‘glory’’ USSR)
Islamic countries: authoritarian rulers draw from religion + see democracy as western concept
!!this makes democracy and authoritarian as opposite cultural traditions
political participation
- conventional and unconventional
actions by individuals intended to influence government and the action it takes
- conventional = within formal political processes and the law (e.g. voting, posting on insta)
- unconventional = takes place outside formal political processes or even the law (e.g. demonstrations, boycotts, terrorism)
*distinction is increasingly blurry due to changing views definition + growing options for participation (Theocaris and van Deth point to risk of conceptual stretching political participation)
- e.g. is there less participation, or are people participating in other (more unconventional ways?)
forms of political participation
more conventional =
- voting
- joining or donating to political parties or interest groups
- contacting elected representatives
- signing petitions
- online participation / clicktivism (e.g. sharing tweets or hashtags, signing online petitions)
- volunteering in campaigns
- running elections
- engaging with social movements
- organizing community campaigns
- attending political rallies or meetings
- raising money for candidates, parties or causes
- running for elected office
more unconventional =
- peaceful demonstrations, protests or walkouts
- organizing or taking part in boycotts
illegal =
- civil disobedience
- occupation of buildings or public spaces
- sabotaging efforts of parties, candidates or elected officials
- hacktivism
- politically motivated crime
- political violence, incl. terrorism and assassination
why do we participate politically?
2 perspectives:
- involvement in collective decision-making is an obligation owed to the community and an exercise of personal development (dates back to ancient Greeks)
- people are not naturally political animals + higher participation does not necessarily point to a healthier democracy, but may point to unresolved tensions within a political system
5 influences:
- idealism: believing in democracy + wanting to protect what is important or to bring about change
- responsibility: feeling a civic responsibility to take part
- being heard: wanting to be counted as part of the potential solution
- mobilization: encouraged by parties or political leaders
- enjoyment: participating for social reasons, engagement with the community, or the thrill of the competition
patterns of participation
- striking = how little most people in democracies engage with politics outside of voting
- participation is higher among older, better-educated, upper-income citizens: have more resources (knowledge, time, persuasive skill and political interest (satisfaction from engagement as they don’t have to fight the daily struggle)
- ! in this time, political spectatorship might/could/should perhaps also be seen as form of participation
- apathetics: might be because they feel they have nothing to gain from participating OR might be because of political exclusion
metaphor Milbrath and Goel: Gladiators (5-7% fights political battles) + Spectators (watch pol. dev. but only participate through voting ~60%) + Apathetics (avoid formal politics ~35%)
political exclusion
phenomenon by which some - eg. the poor, minorities, unemployed - are discouraged from taking part in collective decision-making because of their marginal position in society
paradox of participation
idea that voting is an irrational act given time and effort involved and the minimal chance that any one vote can make a difference
(rational choice)