reading 2 (chapter 3 and 5) Flashcards
5 defining qualities of states
- government (with recognized authority to administer and represent the state in dealings with other governments)
- population
- territory (marked by borders, and control the movement of people, money, and goods across borders)
- sovereignty (sole authority to impose laws and taxes)
- legitimacy (recognition + acceptance of the state by residents and other states)
states differ from one another in terms of
3
- population numbers
- wealth (WB classifications: high income, upper middle income, lower middle income, low income)
- reach/levels of political authority
Max Weber definition state
a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory
difference state and government
state = political community
government = agency that manages the community (the state)
sovereignty
the unfettered and undivided power to make laws
- Jean Bodin
sovereign body = the one institution unrestricted by higher authority
sovereign body is by definition the state
*notion of sovereignty is weaker when authority is shared (e.g. regional and central governments), then the idea of sovereignty is diluted
(roles of states)
- table p. 116
- law and order
- national security (external threats)
- money (supply and interest rates)
- taxes
- trade
- regulation
- welfare (in the form of public health care, unemployment benefits, educational subsidies and assistance to farmers)
- infrastructure
- legal obligations (international law + IOs)
- citizenship (defining and protecting rights of citizens)
mapping states
- issue
- benchmark of reference
Benchmark = UN membership
problems
- includes EU enclave states (legally states, but practically part of larger surrounding states)
- excludes several territories that function like states but lack sovereignty or legitimacy
- few remaining colonies or overseas territories that lack sovereignty required to be states
- not all states are equal in terms of the degree of control over territories and populations
conclusion: a simple map of the world does not tell us the whole study of states
origins and evolution of states
16-18th century = emergence modern idea of the state (based on Western ideas about sovereignty and autonomy)
main force responsible for emergence state= war
- 14th century invention gunpowder -> arms race + standing armies = requires some administration = foundation bureaucracy
~1850 protectionist trade policies (due to eco. depressions) -> function of states grew (education, factory regulation, etc.)
WW1 = invention passports
important waves of state formation =
- 1648 Peace of Westphalia => adjustments borders + new definition idea of sovereignty + helped make secular authority superior to religion = Westphalian system
- end WW1: end great empires (only Turkey became strong and stable)
- end WW2: welfare state + end colonial era + globalization
- collapse communism and Soviet Union (a Russian empire) = new states (mixed experiences/success)
now: seemingly quiet era in terms of state formation, but can still change (e.g. because post-colonial states struggle to stay together)
quasi states
Jackson: states that won independence from a former colonial power but have since lost control over much of their territory
are recognized by the international community, but barely exist as a functioning entity
e.g. Somalia (civil war 1991 -> collapse centralized government + emergence autonomous regions)
de facto states
Pegg: states that control territory and have their own governments, but are mainly unrecognized by the international community
e.g. Kosovo, Abkhazia, Transnistria, Somaliland, Taiwan
nation-state vs multinational state
nation-state = state that contains only the people belonging to a single nation (rare, e.g. Iceland)
multinational state = multiple national groups live under a shared government (most European states
nation
cultural and historical concept
Anderson: nations are imagined communities
more precise:
- peoples with homelands (nation (Latin): place of birth)
- claims a right to self-determination (seeks sovereignty) = political character
nations have symbiotic relationships with states: states have incentives to encourage national unity so that citizens are loyal
nationalism
2 different meanings:
- originally/classically (19th/20th centuries): nations had a right to shape their own destiny (e.g. also in UN Charter: peoples’ right to self-determination)
- promotion of nationalist groups of their interests through assumed superiority and exclusion (e.g. Nazis lebensraum, Trump anti-immigrant)
many scholars (e.g. Mearsheimer, Walt, Greenfield) see nationalism as main/important force in the world
the future of the state
different views on the future:
- states are as strong as ever
- security state (new tools for states to monitor + broader power)
- grip of states is weakening (interstate cooperation dilutes sovereignty, globalization, states criticized for failures)
failed/fragile/failing state
states that have so many internal problems that they have stopped functioning + have weak state features as described by Rotberg (authority little control + criminal violence worsens + political institutions are ineffective)
now: approx. 20-60 of such states (see e.g. Fragile States index)
causation for failure of states = debated (e.g. blame institutions V environmental factors V luck)