PSY395 Exam 1 Flashcards
Determinism
Events have meaningful, systematic causes.
Empiricism
The method of making observations. (making observations is the best method).
Parsimony
If we have two competing theories, we should use the simpler or more frugal of the two.
Testability
You must be able to realistically test the theory (Validation, Falsification, Qualification)
Positive Test Bias (Confirmation Bias)
The tendency to seek out information that should confirm our theory.
And we do not seek out/ignore information that might falsify our theory.
Deductively Valid Arguments
Arguments where the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion.
Modus Ponens
Affirming the antecedent.
- If my theory is true, then I should observe X.
- My theory is true.
- I observe X.
Modus Tollens
Denying the consequent.
- If my henry is true, then I should observe X.
- I did not observe X.
- Therefore, my theory is not true.
Falsification
The line of demarcation between science and non-science.
We ca show that the consequences of a theory (or an idea) are not empirically supported. Modus Tollens.
Belmont Report
US Department of Health & Human Services creates three ethic principals.
- Respect for persons (autonomy): participants are treated as autonomous, capable of making deliberate decisions about participating in the research.
- Beneficence: maximize benefits and minimizing any possible harmful side effects to the research participants.
- Justice: ensure the fair distribution of costs and benefits to potential research participants - same cost/benefit
Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment
A study of black male sharecroppers in Alabama with Syphilis. Were given ‘treatment’ but not to cure - blood tests. Many had sex with spouses and had children born with congenital syphilis.
Informed Consent
Participants should be provided with all information that might influence their decision to participate.
But not telling them the hypothesis.
-Basic procedure
-risks
-time
-assures voluntary participation, withdrawal without penalty, confidentiality
Contact information.
Coercion
Fear of retribution if choose not to participate.
Benefits are too great (undue influence).
Undue Influence
Providing an incredibly large payment for participation.
Deception
Omission - withholding information Commission - actively lying APA = permissible under three conditions: -research is important -no alternatives -no foreseeable harm
Debriefing
Two purposes:
-Dehoaxing - revealing study’s purpose and hypothesis
-Desensitizing - reducing any stress caused
Two Benefits:
-participation can be seen as a learning experience
-participants respond more positively to research process
Risk/Benefit Ratio
Physical harm -administering drugs -denying sleep/food Stress -stressful tasks -distressing events Loss of Privacy -confidentiality -public observation
Institutional Review Board (IRB) - criteria
- Beneficence (risks minimized)
- Risks reasonable in relation to benefits (beneficence)
- Selection of participants is equitable (justice)
- Informed consent sought (respect)
- Informed consent documented (respect)
IRB Review Procedures
Based on risk Those exempt from review: -no risk -anonymous surveys, questionnaires, educational tests, naturalistic observation, archival research Expedited: -minimal risk (routine risk) -studies with common procedures Full Board Review: -greater than minimal risk -all the rest
IRB Disadvantages
Non-specialists may pass judgment on procedures that they do not understand.
Overzealous in concern for risk of doing research (not enough focus on costs of not doing research).
Variability/inconsistency in decision-making.
APA Code of Ethics
5 general Principles that are an extension of Belmont Principles (includes same three) plus fidelity and responsibility, and integrity.