PSY2002 SEMESTER 1 - WEEK 4 Flashcards

1
Q

define model

A

simplified (idealised) representation of a thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define statistical model

A

mathematical relationship between variables, that hold under specific assumptions (no real explanation of what is going on, why there is relationships)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define theoretical model

A

description of relationship between different mental processes, that make assumptions about nature of these processes (tried explaining relationships between variables)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define regression

A

same as correlation and is a single line through graph representing trends (as seen in statistical models)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

outline what cognitive box-and-arrow models are (informal theoretical model)

A

describe relationship between different mental processes, under assumption that mind operates like multi-staged info processing machine
manipulate input and observe output to have look at mind, allow testing models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are formal cognitive models (theoretical)

A

mathematical description of relationship between mental processes
box and arrows switched for formula to describe our cognitive process, explain them (often computer codes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

outline simplification and abstraction (common model characteristic)

A

only describe parts of info we think are critical for what we’re trying to represent
simplification: making something simpler
abstraction: generating general rules and concepts from specific info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does the right level of abstraction depend on

A

question being asked, what we’re trying to convey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

who was Popper, influence in theories

A

influential in differentiating between scientific and non-scientific theories
suggest non-scientific theory only explains “after fact” and can’t provide falsifiable prediction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

name the 5 stages of models being used for prediction and explanation

A

framework, theory, model, hypothesis, data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define framework

A

conceptual system that defines terms and provides context (eg, cognitive psychology)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

define theory

A

scientific proposition that provides relations between phenomena (eg, early selection theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define model

A

schematic representation of theory, more limited in it’s scope (eg, Broadbent’s filter model)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what should we do if framework keep producing bad theories that are always rejected

A

should change framework - falsification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

give an example of explanation without exact prediction, and then prediction without explanation

A

Ew/oP: models of sz can indicate causes but can’t predict individual cases
Pw/oE: some models can predict whether an individual will develop AD even though not that close to understanding factor explaining AD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are informal cognitive models

A

verbal description of relationship between different cognitive procedure, where some assumptions are often implicit and only provide directional prediction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what are formal/computational model

A

mathematical description of relationship between different cognitive procedure, often instantiated via computer program/simulation
with explicit assumptions, providing often specific numerical prediction

18
Q

formal models allow more specific predictions. what does having numerical simulation of this model mean

A

see if model provide unreasonable prediction so is easier to reject bad models
help us select what experiments to perform (if predictions suggest exact same, no point in running experiments)
provide subtle hypothesis testing, to see how close model is to predicting an actual result

19
Q

formal models allow counter-intuitive predictions. why is this an advantage

A

model can more clearly describe which predictions follow from model
informal models are hard to notice when making counter-intuitive prediction but formal are clear

20
Q

a benefit of formal model is explicit assumption, why

A

allows reveal of unanswered questions, flaws of reasoning, contradictory/unreasonable assumptions and allows assumptions transparent allowing development and futhering of existing theories for improvement

21
Q

what are disadvantages of formal model

A
  1. needs expertise
  2. best compared against other computational model
  3. numerical predictions can be premature
  4. changing model take time and limit progress
22
Q

outline David Marr’s level of analysis

A

idea that we can understand and model a system at a number of levels (3 levels of understanding)
we can only sample tiny fraction of brain’s activity, so this provides solution

23
Q

state Marr 3 levels

A
  1. computational level
  2. algorithm level
  3. implementation level
24
Q

what is compuational (1) David Marr levels

A

problem being solved

25
Q

what is algorithm (2) David Marr 3 levels

A

steps/rules to solve it

26
Q

what is implementation (3) David Marrs 3 levels

A

actual machinery

27
Q

why are top-down approaches not pure, where is it most common

A

use knowledge of available data so limits POV
common in cognitive science, AI

28
Q

where is bottom-up approach more common

A

cognitive neuroscience

29
Q

did Marr believe top-down or bottom-up was better

A

top-down = not overloaded by infinite amount of data we could find
but best way is to consider all 3 levels at same time

30
Q

apply bottom-up approach to David Marr levels

A

start at implementation (build model of neural networks), then ask what representations/algorithms can be generated (2nd level), then ask what kind of problems can be solved with these algorithms

31
Q

apply top-down approach to David Marr levels

A
  1. problem first - what is problem we need to solve?
  2. then rules- what representation/algorithms can solve it
  3. then implementation- how can representations/algorithms be implemented in neural circuits
32
Q

give an issue of using top-down approach for David Marr levels

A

if identify potential algorithm at level 2, no garuntee could model neural circuits capable of implementing this

33
Q

whats an implicit model

A

assumption hidden, internal consistency untested, logical consequences and relation to data unknown

34
Q

whats an explicit model

A

assumptions shown, can be studied, sensitivity analysis to identify most salient uncertainties and important thresholds

35
Q

how does using modelling change focus from testing hypothesis to testing formal model and why is this good

A

forces scientist to document what theory assumes, allows comparison to other models and compare different parameter value effects within a model

36
Q

what is pizza problem

A

if we don’t make thinking explicit via formal modelling then have massive inconsistency in our understanding of own models

37
Q

what is path function

A

function where output is dependent on path of transformations that inputs undergo

38
Q

whats specification

A

formal description of system to be implemented based on theory, providing means of discriminating between theory-relevant, closer to core claims of theory and theory-irrelevant, auxiliary assumptions

39
Q

what is implementation

A

instantiation of models created using anything and in computer modelling usually codebase written in 1 or more programming languages

40
Q

what are open theories

A

developed explicitly, defined formally, explored computationally, more robust to failures of replication (if detected can be explained and drive theory creation not just rejecting theory)

41
Q
A