PSY2002 SEMESTER 1 - WEEK 3 Flashcards
what is reading in a sciency way
transmitting inputs in form of words into comprehension and meaning
input activates existing mental representations of written words, which is linked to meaning and causes output = comprehension
outline mental representation for comprehension (what we hear- speech)
input (speech) activates existing mental representations of sound and links to meaning, causes output (comprehension)
outline mental representation for reading (what we see- writing)
input of written word, activates existing mental representations of written words, links to meaning
causes output of comprehension
name the building blocks for written word comprehension
written word input
form (phonology) + form (orthography)
syntax + morphology
semantics
what is orthography
word form when written down, mostly represented by alphabetic graphemes (graphemes represent phonemes)
iogographic systems use characters to represent whole word (eg; Mandarin)
some languages can be alphabetic languages that look like logographic system (eg; Korean uses letters that represent words but are grouped by characters)
what is an issue of research into orthographics
- anglocentric, focuses on English-speaking POV
- debated topic- do we access both phonology and orthography during reading or just orthography (some think this happen at unconscious level and accessing phonology aids understanding)
name the DRC route of comprehension
written word input - activate letters - activate orthographic form - activate phonological form - semantics
outline development of phonological process for children
children speak years before read and taught to read using phonetics to form connection, eventually sentence
what is a phonological neighbourhood and apply to reading
differ in only 1 phoneme (gait and bait)
if reading involves phonological processing, word with many neighbours has advantage as fixated for less time but if closely related slow down word recognition as all activate, compete
what can phonological priming be used to assess, and how does it do this
assess role of phonology in word processing, showing words processed faster when preceded by phonological identical non-word primes than control
suggests phonological processing rapid, automatic
name 2 computational models of reading aloud
- dual-route cascaded model
- distributed connectionist approach/triangle model
what is main focus of dual-route cascaded model
reading word/nonword involves different processes
what is main focus of distributed connectionist approach/triangle model (opposition of DRC)
reading processes flexible, involve interactive processes with all relevant knowledge on word sounds, spelling, meaning used in parallel
outline DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud
lexical and non-lexical routes used in parallel if reading aloud, with both routes not functioning independently
cascaded, as activation on one level passed onto next before processing at first level complete
in DRC, how are connections adjusted and what do they do
excitatory connections motivate process
inhibitory connections stop process
adjusts strength of connection, provide input, processes input into model, assesses output of model against human performance
evaluate computational model in general
allows us to ask very specific questions and test results but rarely can model all variables and parameters at work, not likely to get absolute answer, but good for testing specific questions
in DRC, what does non-lexical route do
convert letters into sounds to activate phonological representation that links to meaning
in DRC, what does lexical route do
activates orthographic representation (stored written word) that is linked directly to meaning
when is Grapheme Phoneme Correspondences GPC (Spelling-to-Sound Correspondences) used in DRC
when processing via non-lexical route must go via GPC
what is a grapheme, how do they relate to phoneme?
single grapheme represents single phoneme and grapheme can be made up of a number of letters eg; Th, igh, ough
same grapheme can be used to represent >1 phoneme (i in mint/pint) and single phoneme can be represented by >1 grapheme (k = c,k,ck)
define regular words
follow set of rules that dictate how grapheme should be pronounced
explain regular and irregular words and how they are created regarding graphemes
lots of variety in how phonemes are represented, via graphemes
mint is regular, pint irregular
both contain grapheme ‘i’ but prounounced differently
what is transparent language
also known as shallow orthography
spelling of each word maps directly onto its pronunciation (ie, Finnish/Italian)
orthographies with lots of reuglar correspondences (sound as they are written, eg; dog)
is transparent or opaque language easier to learn
children learn transparent language, eg; Italian quicker
what is opaque language
orthography with few regular correspondences eg; yacht
spelling of each word does not map directly onto its pronunciation eg; English
if written word is mint, how would a lexical, or non-lexical process this (DRC)
via GPC if non-lexical
/m/ /i/ /n/ /t/
if lexical, simply
see /mint/
when would non-lexical route not be able to be used (DRC)
irregular word ie; pint
/p/ /i/ /n/ /t/
p’in’t not a word (if said as written)
need to use semantics via lexicon to understand what a pint is to then say it correctly
what route does surface dyslexic rely on
route 1 (non-lexical) GPC
have problem reading irregular word
name 4 advantages of the DRC
- allow 2 routes of processing written word, so account for differences in learning
- account for orthographic lexicon, phonological lexicon
- account for processing regular, irregular word
- account for encountering new/novel word, can be processed via grapheme-phoneme correspondence
give 5 limitations of DRC
- focus on reading of individual words but real life is in sentences
- deemphasise semantic processes in reading (occurs in temporal lobe)
- cannot explain how children learn grapheme-phoneme rules
- assume phonological processing of word is slow with little effect on word recognition or reading
- lack applicability to Non-English language
what is understanding spelling to sound correspondence crucial for (grapheme-phoneme correspondence)
learning to read in alphabetic writing systems
outline self-teaching hypothesis (Share, 1995)
children ‘decode’ words using understanding of how letter correspond to sound (phonics)