Property Dualism (AI) Flashcards

1
Q

Property Dualism

A

Mental properties are not reducible to or dependent upon physical properties, even if they arise from physical systems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Philosophical Zombies Argument (Chalmers)

A

If it’s conceivable that beings physically identical to us lack consciousness (zombies), consciousness must be non-physical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Response to Zombies Argument — Zombies Aren’t Conceivable

A

The idea of zombies is incoherent — true physical duplicates would necessarily have consciousness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Response to Zombies Argument — Conceivable ≠ Metaphysically Possible

A

Imaginability does not guarantee metaphysical possibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Response to Zombies Argument — Possibility Tells Us Nothing About Reality

A

Even if zombies are metaphysically possible, this does not show that our consciousness is non-physical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Knowledge/Mary Argument (Frank Jackson)

A

Mary learns all physical facts about colour vision but learns something new upon experiencing colour, suggesting physical facts aren’t enough to explain consciousness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Response to Mary — Ability Knowledge

A

Mary gains a new skill or ability (e.g., recognising colours) rather than new propositional knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Response to Mary — Acquaintance Knowledge

A

Mary gains acquaintance with colour experiences rather than factual knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Response to Mary — New Knowledge / Old Fact

A

Mary learns an old fact in a new way, not new information. She gains new propositional knowledge of the same physical fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Problem of Other Minds

A

If minds are non-physical and private, how can we ever know other minds exist?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Response — Argument from Analogy

A

Others behave as I do when feeling things, so it is reasonable to infer they also have minds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Response — Best Hypothesis

A

The existence of other minds is the best explanation for observed behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Category Mistake (Gilbert Ryle)

A

Dualism wrongly treats the mind as a separate object rather than a way of describing mental processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conceptual Interaction Problem (Princess Elisabeth)

A

How can a non-physical mind interact causally with a physical body if they are fundamentally different substances?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Epiphenomenalism

A

Epiphenomenalism is a position in the philosophy of mind according to which mental states or events are caused by physical states or events in the brain but do not themselves cause anything.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Empirical Interaction Problem

A

No scientific evidence shows non-physical substances affecting the physical world.

17
Q

Epiphenomenalism: Introspective Self-Knowledge Challenge

A

If mental states don’t cause anything, how can we know them through introspection?

18
Q

Epiphenomenalism: Phenomenology Challenge

A

Our mental experiences seem to involve causal connections, which epiphenomenalism denies.

19
Q

Epiphenomenalism: Evolutionary Challenge

A

If mental states have no causal role, natural selection would not favour them — yet conscious mental states exist.

20
Q

What is the Explanatory Gap in the context of Property Dualism?

A

The explanatory gap suggests that there is a gap between physical explanations of brain processes and explanations of subjective experience (qualia). This gap indicates that physicalism cannot fully account for consciousness, supporting Property Dualism.

21
Q

What is the Knowledge Argument (Mary’s Room) in support of Property Dualism?

A

The Knowledge Argument, proposed by Frank Jackson, argues that Mary, a color scientist who knows all physical facts but has never experienced color, gains new knowledge about consciousness after experiencing color, suggesting that mental properties are not reducible to physical properties.

22
Q

What is the Argument from Consciousness for Property Dualism?

A

The argument claims that consciousness itself (the quality of experience) cannot be explained by physical processes. Property Dualism asserts that consciousness is an additional, non-physical property that cannot be reduced to or supervenient upon brain processes.

23
Q

What is the challenge of Causal Efficacy of Mental Properties in Property Dualism?

A

Mental states appear to have causal power over physical states. For example, decisions or intentions (mental properties) can cause physical actions. Property Dualism claims that mental properties play an active causal role that cannot be fully explained by physical properties alone.

24
Q

How does Personal Identity support Property Dualism?

A

Property Dualism argues that our sense of personal identity over time is grounded in non-physical mental properties, rather than being reducible to physical brain processes, challenging physicalist explanations of identity.

25
What is the challenge posed by Mental Disorders to Property Dualism?
Mental disorders like depression or schizophrenia cannot be fully understood by brain states alone. Property Dualism suggests that mental properties (such as emotional or psychological experiences) cannot be entirely explained by physical states, especially when physical changes do not correspond to mental experience.
26
What is the Argument from Intentionality in Property Dualism?
Mental states (e.g., beliefs, desires) have intentionality—they are about something. Property Dualism claims that intentionality cannot be reduced to physical properties, as physical states do not have the same directedness or "aboutness."
27
What is the issue of Neural Correlation in Property Dualism?
While brain states strongly correlate with mental states, these correlations do not prove that mental states are identical to brain states. Property Dualism argues that mental states are distinct, even if they are associated with physical brain activity.
28
What is the issue of Supervenience in Property Dualism?
Property Dualism maintains that mental states supervene upon physical states (they depend on them), but are not reducible to or fully explained by them. This distinction supports the idea that mental properties exist alongside physical properties.