Professional Practice Flashcards

1
Q

Between-Subject Designs

A

Performances os separate groups of subjects are measured and comparisons are then made between the two groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Within-Subject Designs

A

Performances of same group is compared in different conditions and/or in different situations; sequencing effect may occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Subject Randomization (Between subject design)

A

Each subject has equal probability of being assigned to either the experimental or control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Subject Randomization (Within-subject design)

A

Presentation of the experimental treatment conditions to the subject (s) in random order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Subject Matching

A

Experimenter purposely attempts to match members of two groups based on all extraneous variables relevant to the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Counterbalancing

A

Technique that enables researcher to be able to control and measure sequencing effects by testing different participants in different orders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sequencing Effect

A

May occur when subjects participate in several conditions (e.g., subjects participation in an earlier condition affect their performance in subsequent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A-B-A Design

A

A: establish a baseline condition (“A”)
B: introduce treatment of intervention to effect some sort of change (“B”)
A: remove treatment to see if return to baseline (second “A”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A-B-A-B Design

A

A: establish a baseline condition (“A”)
B: introduce treatment of intervention to effect some sort of change (“B”)
A: remove the treatment (second “A”)
B: re-introduce the treatment (second “B”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sampling Method

A

A technique of selecting individuals or a group of individuals from a population to use in research studies (probability and non-probability samples)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Probability Samples

A
  1. Simple Random Sampling
  2. Systematic Sampling
  3. Stratified Random Sampling
  4. Cluster Sampling
  5. Multistage Sampling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Non-Probability Samples

A
  1. Purposive Sampling

2. Convenience Sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Simple Random Sampling

A

Every member of population chosen randomly and has an equal chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Systematic Sampling

A

Sample members are choses at regular intervals every nth member

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stratified Random Samplin

A

Population divided into subgroups before random selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cluster Sampling

A

Population divided into clusters based on demographics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Multistage Sampling

A

Draw a sample from population using smaller and smaller groups at each stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Purposive Sampling

A

Specific individuals are chosen to participate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Convenience Samplin

A

Depends on ease of access and proximity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Key steps of Evidence Based Practice

A
  1. Internal clinical evidence
  2. External research evidence
  3. Patient preferences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Level I Evidence

A

Systematic review/meta-analysis of all relevant RCTs

3+ good quality randomized control trials with similar results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Level II Evidence

A

1+ well designed randomized control trial(s)

23
Q

Level III Evidence

A

Well designed non-randomized quasi-experimental studies

24
Q

Level IV Evidence

A

Well designed case-control or cohort studies

25
Level V Evidence
Systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies
26
Level VI Evidence
Single descriptive or qualitative study
27
Level VII Evidence
Expert opinion and/or reports of expert committees
28
International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF)
Developed by WHO; classification framework to guide clinical practice-- helps target person-centered functional goals to maximize outcomes and experiences
29
Components of ICF
Health Condition: disorder or disease Body Functions & Structures: anatomy and physiology Activities & Participation: activity limitations and participation restrictions Environmental Factors: within individuals life, influence experiences ALL INFLUENCE EACH OTHER
30
Epidemiology
Study of factors that determine the prevalence and incidence of diseases
31
Prevalence
How widespread a disorder is in the current population | - # of individuals with a particular disease/disorder at a given time
32
Incidence
Rate of individuals who developed a disease/disorder | -occurrence of new cases, typically reported within a given time
33
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)
Provides standard, international guidelines for coding and recording diseases and health problems
34
Etiology
Study of the cause and/or origin of diseases
35
Norm Referenced
Always standardized; compares individual performance to group standard; compares person that are same age, grade, etc; assess individual performance to the norm
36
Criterion Referenced
May or may not be standardized; determines individual mastery of particular skill(s); identify what a client can or cannot doe; no group performance comparison
37
Standardized Testing
Standard set procedures for admin/scoring (usually norm-referenced)
38
Standard "z" Score
How many standard deviations the raw score is from the mean
39
Percentile Rank
Percent of people scoring at or below a certain score
40
Null hypothesis
No statistical difference/relationship between groups among variables
41
Raw Scores
Actual scores earned
42
Standar deviation
Extent to which scores deviate from the mean or average score
43
Validity
Degree assessment measures what it says it measures
44
Face
Test looks like it assesses what it says it does
45
Content
Actual content assesses what it says it does
46
Construct
Measures a predetermine theoretical construct
47
Criterion
Established by external criteria
48
Concurrent
Degree to which new test correlates with an established test of known validity
49
Predictive
Accuracy in which a test predicts future performance on related task
50
Reliability
Consistency and stability in varying contexts
51
Test-Retest
Stability across multiple administrations with same group
52
Split-Half
internal consistency of a test
53
Rater-Reliability
Intra-rater (same person), inter-rater (different person)
54
Alternate Form
Multiple forms of test provide the same results