Process and Outcome Flashcards
What is the dodo bird conjecture?
Rozenzweig (1936): Dodo bird conjecture of “Everybody has won, and all must have prizes”
– argued against specificity and for the non-central aspects common in most therapies
-Dodo bird revisited (Duncan, 2002)
What is Goldfriend’s (1980) argument about common factors?
at strategy level of abstraction, therapies had particular commonalities
Dissatisfaction with individual theoretical approaches spawned three movements?
1 theoretical integration,
2 technical eclecticism,
3 common factors (Arkowitz, 1992)
allegiance better predictor of outcome than what?
type of therapy (Berman, Miller, & Massman, 1985)
–these guys also believe that comparative designs (comparing 2 or more groups to each other without control groups) is more internally valid than using control groups.
What do Frank & Frank (1991) consider to be common elements to all therapies?
- emotionally charged
- confiding relationship
- healing setting
- rationale or conceptual scheme for problem and treatment
- procedure based on rationale that requires active participation
The Great psychotherapy debate (citation)
Wampold, 2001
This study claimed that therapy was ineffective and was no better than spontaneous remission
Eysenck, 1952
What was the first meta-analysis of psychotherapy, and what did it find?
Smith & Glass (1977) published the first meta-analysis looking at 375 studies comparing a treatment condition to a control condition and found that 75% of those treated were better off than non-treated with an average effect size of .68
What are some problems with comparison studies?
Comparison studies problematic due to allegiance effects, same therapists delivering both conditions of treatment, potential for Type I and Type II error, etc. (Lambert & Ogles, 2004; Wampold, 2000)
What did Wampold find in 1997?
Wampold et al. (1997) large meta-analysis of studies from six major counseling research journals from 1970 to 1995 supported common factors approach.
-therapies should be considered equally effective until evidence has been found that a treatment is not as good.
What is efficacy vs. effectiveness?
Efficacy uses randomized clinical trials, emphasizing internal validity through limiting the types of patients, the types of treatment delivery through manuals, specific training, random assignment (Chambless et al., 1998; Lambert & Ogles, 2004)
Effectiveness studies are in real populations, and can be used to address practical questions such as when, how, and with whom to use a specific treatment (Rush, 2009).
EST has REALLY taken off after what event?
- a 1995 task force on promotion and dissemination of psychological procedures (Lambert & Ogles, 2004; Orlinsky et al., 2004; Wampold & Bahti, 2004)
- 1995 Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures (Division 12) – criteria based on FDA
- managed care companies give pressure to establish comparable efficacy to drug treatments
- NIMH control by psychiatrists; medicalization, required standardization, internal validity versus external validity
APA recognizes that effects due to common factors (absolute efficacy) are more important than effects due to what?
specific treatments (relative efficacy; APA, 2012)
2 important implications of common factors
(1) most valid and structured psychotherapies are roughly equivalent in effectiveness
(2) patient and therapist characteristics, which are not usually captured by a patient’s diagnosis or by the therapist’s use of a specific psychotherapy, affect the results (Castonguay & Beutler, 2006; Livesley, 2007; Norcross, 2011);
The general or average effects of psychotherapy are widely accepted to be significant and _____?
LARGE (Chorpita et al., 2011; Smith, Glass, & Miller, 1980; Wampold, 2001).
EST proponents argue that adherence to a manual is crucial and related to outcomes but _____ is not.
allegiance (Heimberg, 1998; Kazdin, 1998)
Manuals have been around since the 1960s, have they improved client’s outcomes?
No (Lambert, 1998)
How long are ESTs?
EST studies are short, 6-16 sessions (Westen et al., 2004)
What is the multicultural critique of ESTs?
May be incompatible with multicultural sensitivity (Atkinson, et al., 2001). Indeed, culture might influence outcomes (Quntana & Atkinson, 2002)
What was Labert’s (1992) big contribution to the common factors literature?
identified 4 therapeutic factors
- extratherapeutic factors
- common factors
- expectancy or placebo
- techniques
Norcross presented a seminal paper in 2001 that were conclusions of division 29 task force. What were some highlights?
-ESTs that omit therapeutic relationship are lying
-Adapting and tailoring treatment to patient needs is crucial
-Demonstrably Effective
+Therapeutic alliance +Cohesion in group therapy
+Empathy +Goal consensus and collaboration
=Promising and Probably Effective
+Positive regard +Congruence/genuineness
+Feedback +Repair of alliance ruptures
+Self-disclosure +Manage countertransference
+Quality of relational interpretation