Group Counseling Flashcards
Group leaders are most beneficial, generally, when they replicate the ____________ found individual therapy
common factors (Burlingame, MacKenzie, & Strauss; 2004)
Most theories of change develop within the individual thus applying them to groups may be _________
problematic (Burlingame, MacKenzie, & Strauss; 2004)
Yalom (2005) emphasizes that the specific benefits of group are:
provision of social learning,
developing social support,
improving social networks,
-reducing relapse for clients with recurring issues
-adding group therapy to the treatment of women who are survivors of childhood sexual abuse
Leader should thoughtfully integrate agents of change into group rather than conducting _______ in a group setting
individual therapy (Burlingame, MacKenzie, & Strauss; 2004)
Does group work for everybody the same?
No, not all clients have the same experience in group; self-reflective responders value self-understanding; other directed responders value vicarious learning and altruism and affective responders value acceptance and catharsis (Kivlighan, Coleman, & Anderson, 2000)
Group cohesiveness may bolster group members ____________ to group, and therefore the groups’ standards become more salient
attraction (Frank, 1957)
Cohesion predicts ________________
outcome (Burlingame, Fuhriman & Johnson, 2001)
6 predictive factors of group outcome?
(Burlingame, Fuhriman & Johnson, 2001)
- Pregroup preparation,
- early group structure,
- leader interaction,
- feedback,
- leader modeling,
- member emotional expression
Are there differences in outcome between group and individual therapy?
- -Meta-analysis generally do not find differences
- -Effect size in meta-analysis of 111 studies was .58, indicating that the average group recipient is better off than 72% of untreated controls (Fuhriman & Burlingame, 1994)
- Results suggested that group and individual were both efficacious when compared to control groups and were equal in their effectiveness (effect size = 1.35 for both) (Tillitski, 1990)
- (McRoberts, Burlingame, & Hoag, 1998) – Both individual and group therapy better than controls. No statistical difference in effect size.
- -most moderating variables = ns
Is individual therapy ever better?
Yes, individual shown superior when groups do not use process principles (Burlingame, MacKenzie, & Strauss; 2004)
What are Yalom’s 11 therapeutic factors (2005)?
oInstillation of hope oUniversality: oImparting information oAltruism: ocorrective recapitulation of primary family group: oDevelopment of socializing techniques: oImitative behavior: oInterpersonal learning: oThe corrective emotional experience: oThe group as a social microcosm: oGroup cohesiveness: oCatharsis: oExistential factors:
What are Yalom’s criteria for exclusion?
- almost all clients will fit into some group
- good =capacity and willingness to examine their interpersonal behaviors, to self-disclose, and to give and receive feedback
- bad = brain-damaged, paranoid, hypochondriacal, addicted to drugs or alcohol, acutely psychotic, or sociopathic, unable to participate in the primary task of the group, be it for logistical, intellectual, psychological, or interpersonal reasons;interpersonal role that is detrimental to themselves as well as to the group (then group can become a venue to recreate the maladaptive patterns without the possibility of learning or change), deeply depressed suicidal clients (a structured, homogeneous group for chronic suicidality has been reported to be effective), those who can’t make it regularly (long commute, no transportation, etc.)
What are Yalom’s criteria for inclusion?
- MOTIVATION: highly motivated for therapy in general and for group therapy in particular
- willing to take some responsibility for these problems or, at the very least, acknowledge them and entertain a desire for change
- impulsive individuals who find it difficult to control the need to act immediately on their feelings usually work better in groups than in individual therapy
What is Shapiro’s stages of group?
Stages of Groups (Shapiro, Peltz, & Bernadett-Shapiro, 1998)
Phase 1: Preparation: determination of group goals and population, members apply for group, screening
Phase 2: Transition: leader specifies ground rule, introductions, silence, there-and-then discussion, long silence, focus on here-and-now processes, leader encourages expression of emotion
Phase 3: Treatment (Working; Intervention): internal focus, norms solidified, minority members identified, intensity increases, leader employs therapeutic skills, expression feelings about process and group
Phase 4: Termination: leader announces imminent end of group, invitation to work, trust boost, transfer of training, closing ceremonies, leader’s closing,
Cohesion has 2 dimensions, what are they?
structure and quality (Burlingame, Theobald, & Alonso (2011)