Practice Test 4 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Which of the following best describes deontological ethics?
A. We should emphasize character.
B. We should emphasize pleasure maximization.
C. We should emphasize the rule, “the greatest good for the greatest number”.
D. We should be our duty.

A

D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

T/F The following is a normative claim: “Surveys indicate the most American baseball players think there is nothing wrong with stealing signs from the other team.”

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
Which of the following schools of though would emphasize "ethos" in understanding the nature of sports?
A. Conventionalism
B. Broad Internalism
C. Formalism
D. Broad Externalism
A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Due the a rupture in the space time continuum, Aristotle recently replaced Theo Epstein as general manager of the Chicago Cubs. Upon finding out that his players had been drinking in the clubhouse during games Aristotle responds by arguing that such behavior cannot be tolerated for “we become what we practice”. Which of the following best summarize what he meant?
A. If we don’t follow the rules, we fail to do our duty.
B. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one.
C. Our behavior creates habits, habits create character.
D. Most scientific practice has shown that alcohol inhibits athletic performance.

A

C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
In the film "Seeking the Perfect 10" a mother told her seven year old daughter with a broken ankle:
A. "to rest, let it heal"
B. "that no pain means no gain"
C. "suck it up"
D. "character demands sacrifice"
A

C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

T/F Simon argues that, even absent the perfect argument, there is sufficient warrant to ban steroids.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

According to J.S. Mill’s Harm Principle we can paternalistically interfere when:
A. Our interference will prevent harm to our own children.
B. Our interference will prevent harm to any child.
C. Our interference will produce the greatest good for the greatest number.
D. Our interference fits with Kant’s “Categorical Imperative”.

A

B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

T/F Simon discusses three types of arguments against genetic alteration. The “theological” argument, the “autonomy” argument, and the “fairness” argument.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When discussing Title IX, Simon (text):
A. is willing to cut men’s sports, in order to meet Title IX requirements, but only as a last resort.
B. believes that cutting men’s sports to gain compliance is never justified.
C. demands that cutting men’s teams is not only permissible but necessary.
D. Insists that Title IX mandates that schools have equal number of men’s and women’s sports.

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Simon argues that “autonomy” is a strong argument against genetic enhancement. Which of the following best summarizes the “autonomy” argument?
A. We should not play “God” with the human genetic code.
B. Freedom demands that no one should be subject to the designs of others.
C. To design people is to turn them into means not ends.
D. The high cost of enhancement will create haves and have-nots.

A

B or C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
Which of the following is not one of the planks in the OCR's interpretation of Title IX?
A. Continuing history and practice
B. Meeting interests and abilities
C. Equal funding
D. Proportionality
A

C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
"By suggesting that women need separate teams we're suggesting inferiority" (stigma). The previous claim, if true, would be most problematic for which school of thought regarding sex equity?
A. Sex blindness
B. Assimilationism
C. Pluralism
D. Proportionality
A

C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
A defender of the claim that "seperate sexes" is justified, might argue that "relevant differences (between men and women) can sometimes justify different treatment." For instance, differences in meal money per athlete may be justified (if both sexes are eating well on the money allotted). Proponents of such thinking wuld most likely identify themselves with:
A. Equal respect and concern
B. Equal treatment
C. Assimilationism
D. Sex blindness
A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which of the following best summarizes the weak version of the incompatibility thesis?
A. Sort and academics are like oil and water. They do not and cannot mix.
B. There is no inherent incompatibility between sport and academics. Only big-time sport is problematic.
C. Cheating and winning are logically incompatible because when cheaters break the rules they fail to play the game.
D. A consequentialist analysis of intercollegiate sport shows that the goods far outweigh the harms.

A

B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

T/F Dr. T argued that one of the major reasons that Division III is far healthier than Division I athletics is because Division I offers athletic scholarships, while Division III does not.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

T/F The following is a descriptive claim: “Surveys indicate the most American baseball players think there is nothing wrong with stealing signs from the other team.”

A

True

16
Q
Which of the following schools of thought would emphasize "rules" in understanding the nature of sport?
A. Conventionalism
B. Broad Internalism
C. Formalism
D. Broad Externalism
A

C

17
Q

T/F Former NCAA President Myles Brand (text) argues that intercollegiate sport can be defended - at least in part - by comparing athletics to music, theatre and the fine arts.

A

True

18
Q

Which of the following best summarizes the strong version of the incompatibility thesis?
A. Sport and academics are like oil and water. They do not and cannot mix.
B. There is no inherent incompatibility between sport and academics. Only big-time sport is problematic.
C. Cheating and winning are logically incompatible because when cheaters break the rules they fail to play the game.
D. A consequentialist analysis of intercollegiate sport shows that the goods far outweigh the harms.

A

A

19
Q

Simon argues that “The mutual quest for excellence [in sport] reinforces academic values [in the classroom]”. Which of the following best summarizes how Dr. T evaluated that claim (lecture)?
A. There is no truth to it. Athletics and academics are like oil & water, they don’t mix.
B. It is obviously true. Sport builds character.
C. It may be true, depending on whether one accedes to pluralism or assimilationism.
D. It may be true in principle, but much depends upon how college sport is actually practiced.

A

D