POPH192 Lecture 22 - Research Ethics Flashcards
what are the 6 basic ethical considerations to make research ethically okay?
1) asses the benefits and risks and ensure the ratio is acceptable (beneficence and non-maleficence)
2) be aware of potential vulnerabilities of participants
3) avoid or manage conflicts of interest]
4) obtain informed consent from participants
5) consider how the benefits and burdens of the research should be shared across society
6) introduce regulations and processes to ensure these all happen
what are the 3 NEAC guidelines for ethical principles?
1) respect for people
2) justice
3) beneficence and non-maleficence
what is beneficence?
the obligations that we have to ‘benefit’ others
what is beneficence in regards to research?
the obligation to ensure that the research is generating something of value that justifies the costs
what is non-maleficence?
the obligation that we have not to harm others without a justifying reason
what is non-maleficence in regards to research?
being aware of the various potential harms to participants and others, and either taking steps to avoid these or ensuring that the benefits are sufficient to justify the harms
what does the research ethics committees require applicants to show?
-an awareness of the various costs or harms to participant, including time, resources, coercive factors, and any opportunity costs (including other treatments)
-strategies to address these harms or costs
-an awareness of potential cultural sensitivities or interests, including (in NZ) the implications for Maori
Evidence of the scientific validity of the research
what is clinicial equipoise?
the requirement that researchers only provide an experimental treatment if the evidence for the experimental treatment is equal to that available for the standard treatment. the idea is that the participant should not suffer any substantial disadvantage from being in the study
what are some doubts about equipoise?
- there can be disagreement about when evidence is ‘equally poised’
- there can be debate about which ‘standard treatment’ the intervention should be compared to (e.g is it the best available or what the participant could plausibly access
what is a vulnerable person?
any person who is more at exploitation, because of social or physical disadvantages
what are examples of a vulnerable person?
- poorer people
- those subject to racial or religious discrimination
- people who are less educated
- those suffering cognitive impairments
- older people
- prisoners
- children
- people who are ill (patients)
what is a conflict of interest?
a situation where a person holds two or more potentially incompatible interests
why is conflict of interest an issue in research?
a concern where the researcher(s) have interests that might compromise the values discussed
what are the 4 ways conflicts of interests can arise in research?
1) professionally
2) academically
3) financially
4) politically
what are the ways a conflict of interest can be managed?
through peer review, binding, open to access to data, auditing, and using independant people to recruit participants