pmph Flashcards
When a patient seeks treatment without an appointment, dentists can respond in different ways depending on the circumstances. Other than asking the patient to make an appointment or come back another time, list five different options open to a dentist when responding to a request for unscheduled dental attention. For each option, comment on whether or not it entails a duty of care
- Advise the patient that if it is an emergency to contact NHS 24 on 111 (as the patient is not registered with this dentist, they do not have a duty of care)
- Register the patient & provide a temporary solution to their problem with their tooth (as the patient is now registered, the dentist now has a duty of care)
- Refer them to another practice nearby that may be able to see them if they are still open (as they are not registered there is no duty of care)
- Provide them with details of out of hours arrangements of dental care (does not entail a duty of care)
- Since it is the end of the day register the patient and get them to come back for an appointment the following day (now a duty of care)
With her dental nurse present, Ms Lee examines Mr Drummond, with his consent, and finds that his mouth has been badly bleeding as the result of a lower lateral incisor being knocked out in an accident. The blood flow from the wound has now stopped but the avulsed tooth was lost earlier after spitting it out. The gum and lower lip are otherwise intact. Having checked his medical history, she is satisfied that the injury is uncomplicated and can be safely allowed to heal before commencing treatment on a future occasion.
Given the clinical picture arising from Ms Lee’s examination of the patient, list five separate tasks that she should perform on this initial occasion in fulfilment of professional standards
- Record details of what happened during her consultation with Mr. Drummond in her notes
- Provide the patient with options to proceed with treatment
- Provide benefits of going ahead with treatment
- Provide issues that may occur if Mr. Drummond does not go ahead with treatment
- Provide Mr. Drummond with costs of each treatment option with a written treatment plan
- Ask for patient’s consent to treatment by asking them to read and then sign the treatment plan with explanations of the treatment given prior to this
After he leaves, Mr Drummond is convinced that more should have been done and contemplates taking legal advice on whether Ms Lee was negligent in her actions
List the four criteria for clinical negligence in general (not specific to Ms Lee’s actions in this case). Further, given that in the legal system there are two different standards of evidence used in different types of court case, state which one of these applies in establishing negligence
- Dentist should have a duty of care towards the patient
- Dentist breached the duty of care (standard of care)
- The breach in duty of care lead to harm to the patient (causation)
- The damage/harm caused was reasonably foreseeable & has negative consequences & effects (damage)
- Balance of probability applies to negligence
Which 4 things would need to be shown to prove a breach in duty of care?
Duty: It must be established that the defendant had a duty of care towards the plaintiff. This means that the defendant had a legal obligation to act in a way that would not cause harm to the plaintiff.
Standard of care: It must be shown that the defendant breached the standard of care that was owed to the plaintiff. This means that the defendant failed to take the necessary precautions or actions that a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would have taken to avoid causing harm to the plaintiff.
Causation: It must be shown that the defendant’s breach of duty caused the plaintiff’s harm. This means that the plaintiff’s harm was a direct result of the defendant’s actions or inaction.
Damages: It must be shown that the plaintiff suffered actual harm or damages as a result of the defendant’s breach of duty. This can include physical injuries, emotional distress, or financial losses.
To establish a breach of duty of care, all four of these elements must be proven.
name two legal systems to prove a breach in duty of care
NEGLIGENCE = BREACH OF DUTY
STRICT LIABILITY = PROOF THAT ACTIONS CAUSED HARM
The two legal systems that are commonly used to prove a breach of duty of care are:
Negligence: This is the most common legal system used to prove a breach of duty of care. In a negligence claim, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty of care towards the plaintiff, breached that duty of care, and caused the plaintiff’s harm as a result of that breach. Negligence is a civil wrong that can result in damages being awarded to the plaintiff.
Strict liability: In a strict liability claim, the plaintiff does not need to prove that the defendant was negligent or breached a duty of care. Instead, the plaintiff must only prove that the defendant’s actions caused the plaintiff’s harm. Strict liability is often used in cases where a product has caused harm to a consumer, and the manufacturer may be held liable even if they were not negligent in their actions.
Both negligence and strict liability can be used to prove a breach of duty of care, but they have different requirements for proving liability.
Negligence requires proof of a breach of duty of care, while strict liability only requires proof of causation. The choice of legal system used will depend on the circumstances of the case and the specific laws in the jurisdiction where the case is being heard.
Pregnant girl in your surgery and you ring her house and she is not in. Your nurse discusses the pregnancy with her mother. Definition of informed consent
- Voluntary and continuing permission of an appropriately informed individual
- Individual has capacity to consent and has sufficient knowledge of the purpose, nature, likely effects & risks of a treatment
- Must be aware of likelihood of success of procedure & any alternatives
- Informed consent-patient has enough information to make decision
- Voluntary decision making-patient has made the decision themselves
- Ability to make informed decision
- Assumption of capacity in patients over 16 unless assessed otherwise
- Implied consent for minor procedures. Expressed consent for major invasive procedure
- Oral & written consent are equally lawful if a record is kept
Negligence when:
- Dentist owed a DUTY OF CARE: There is a usual and normal practise
- The duty was BREACHED: Dentist did not adopt that practise
- Course the dentist adopted is one which no dentist of ordinary skill would have taken if acting with ordinary care.
- Breach caused or contributed to HARM: Harm resulting from dental treatment is negligent if the dentist’s practise does not meet standard of ordinary care
- Damage was REASONABLY FORSEEABLE and had negative consequences
- Document any steps taken, precautions taken with x-rays e.g working lengths
- GDP judged by standard of other GDPs
- Risk of instrument failure is well known and is therefore foreseeable-assessment should be conducted prior to using any equipment
8 thing gdc advise to gain consent
Discuss the proposed treatment
Discuss alternative treatment options
Discuss the risks and benefits of the proposed treatment
Discuss the likely outcome of the proposed treatment
Discuss any significant risks
Assess the patient’s capacity:
Obtain the patient’s consent
Document the consent process
what is valid consent
Valid consent requires that the patient has the capacity to understand the information provided, has been given sufficient information to make an informed decision, and has voluntarily given consent without coercion or pressure from others.
In order to obtain valid consent, healthcare professionals must follow certain legal and ethical standards, which include providing the patient with clear and accurate information about the proposed treatment, discussing any significant risks or potential complications, and ensuring that the patient has had adequate time to consider the information provided before making a decision.
what is legal consent
In order to be considered legally valid, consent must be given voluntarily and with full knowledge of the risks and benefits of the proposed treatment, and the patient must have the capacity to understand the information provided.
Practice is planning to make a questionnaire. What will allow it to face validity?
Give two examples of points that need to be taken into consideration?
Define the purpose
Use clear and concise language
Pilot test the questionnaire
Use a diverse sample
Target audience – age, sociodemographic
What treatment they have under taken
Clear and specific questions - no jargon
Avoid bias and leading questions
List three common anxiety provoking and maintaining factors
Negative dental experience
Modelling parents anxiety
Media
Give three examples of the psycho-social effects of stigma around the oral-facial appearance?
Inability to carry out daily tasks
Depression
Inability to communicate
Inability to enjoy food
Define “phobia”
Severe anxiety manifested as a marked or persistent anxiety in relation to clearly discensible situations or objects in general
A phobia is an excessive and irrational fear of a specific object, situation, or activity that poses little or no real danger.
What three psychological/behavioural treatments can be used in overcoming dental phobia?
Exposure therapy and cognitive coping strategies
Muscle relaxation therapy
Refer to psychologist
Give patient control – real/illusionary?
Briefly outline four factors associated with the development and maintenance of anxiety about dental treatment.
Past traumatic experience
Fear of loss of control
Fear of judgement
Perceived pain or discomfort
You decide to assess how anxious she is about elements of dentistry. What assessment tool/questionnaire do you have available that you could use to assess her anxiety? Describe the questionnaire and give two examples of the questions it asks.
the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS), Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), and Corah’s Dental Anxiety Scale.
The MDAS is a five-item self-report questionnaire that measures dental anxiety. It asks about anxiety related to specific aspects of dental treatment, including scaling and polishing, local anesthesia, and drilling. The questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not anxious, 5 = extremely anxious) to rate the level of anxiety for each item.
Here are two example questions from the MDAS:
“How anxious would you feel about having a tooth drilled?”
“How anxious would you feel about having an injection in your mouth?”
Facial Image Scale in kids
You are going to give Susan some assistance with her anxiety. List four treatments available that you could use to help her manage her anxiety
- General attitude and the application of a general anxiety reducing treatment style:
Acknowledge patient’s feeling of anxiety
Foster a trusting relationship
Provide realistic information
Provide a high level of predictability (explain the appointment goals at the start)
Provide Control
- Teach coping strategies:
Relaxation – simple breathing awareness, to techniques like progressive muscle relaxation (lots of apps out there to help)
Distraction – General friendly discussion, visualisation and imagery, (children – teaching a magic tricks, sums in head, a squeeze ball)
- Specific pharmacological support:
If necessary prescribe a benzodiazepine (adults) prior to treatment nitrous oxide sedation
Behavioural - fear hierarchy
waiting room -> fear -> seeing the needle -> holding the needle -> feeling the needle on the gum -> intra-oral injection
In practice, exposure therapy is often combined with teaching the patient (called psycho-education) cognitive coping strategies:
Using pleasant and positive imagery, identifying
Use of coping statements. “I can and I will, this is fine”
Exploring The Evidence Supporting The Thoughts
elief – “I have never coped well with pain and I’m rubbish at everything”
Exploring: ”Have you had any experiences of a lot of pain before?”
Response: “Yes, when I gave birth to my first child”
Exploring: “Yeah, I’ve heard how painful that can be! What was it like once your child was born?”
Choose two from the list of anxiety-reducing treatments you are considering and outline the points with regards to relative effectiveness and practicality that you will discuss with Susan.
Provide high level of predicatability
vicious cycle model of dental anxiety and fear
fear/anxiety -> avoidance -> deterioration in dental status -> feelings of shame and inferiority