Peds (2008-2019) Flashcards
What are 4 poor prognostic factors in a radial neck fracture in children? (2012, 2013)
- Older patient (age>10y) *
- Requires open reduction *
- Associated Injuries *
- Delayed treatment *
- Internal fixation
- Poor reduction
- Angulation >30deg *
- Translation >3mm *
- *denotes presence of list in Lovell and Winter p1738
- What are 4 indications for percutaneous pinning of a distal radius fracture in the pediatric population. (2010, 2011, 2013)
- Floating elbow
- Late displacement/failure to maintain reduction in cast
- Open fracture
- Associated Acute compartment syndrome
- Displaced intra-articular fracture
- Severe soft tissue injury precluding cast
FLOADS
- What are three intra-operative techniques to reduce avascular necrosis during antegrade, locked, rigid femoral nail for an adolescent fracture? (2011, 2013)
- Trochanteric/lateral start point
- Smallest nail size
- Minimal dissection (posterior dissection)
- Percutaneous
- Sharp reamers
- In a type II tibial eminence fracture (2015)
- What is the block to reduction?
- What are the consequences of failed reduction? (2 points)
- What is the block to reduction?
- Meniscus (usually anterior horn of medial meniscus)
- Intermeniscal ligament
- What are the consequences of failed reduction? (2 points)
- ACL Instability
- Stiffness/Notch Impingement
- 3 complications associated with pediatric tibial tubercle fracture (2012, 2014)
JAAOS 2002 - Fractures around the knee in children
- Compartment Syndrome
- Recurvatum Deformity
- Leg Length Discrepancy
- Hardware Irritation
- Re-fracture
- Stiffness
- Patella Baja
- Saphenous neuroma
- Non-union
- Skin Necrosis
- What volume of crystalloid do you bolus a peds trauma pt (in cc/kg)?
- 10
- 20
- 30
- 40
ANSWER: B (20cc/kg)
2009
Confirmed with ATLS manual
- 13 yr F with proximal humerus 60% displaced, 45 degrees angulated. What is the best treatment
- ORIF
- CRPP
- Sling
- Thoracobrachial cast
ANSWER: B (CRPP)
- 2012
- JAAOS - Pediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures
- Acceptable reduction over age 10
- <20-30o angulation
- 50% displacement
- Lovell and Winter p1700
- Dobbs et al. (28) used >2/3 width displacement (Neer grade III or IV) and angulation >45 degrees in older adolescents (>12 years) as indications for attempted closed reduction under general anesthesia. If a successful reduction could be obtained (to grade II or less displacement and <45 degrees angulation), then stability was tested. If unstable, the fracture was treated with percutaneous pin fixation and immobilization. If an acceptable reduction could not be achieved closed, an open reduction was performed using a deltopectoral approach.
- 9 yo boy sustains completely displaced irreducible proximal humerus #. Intraoperatively, what is the block to reduction? REPEAT
- periosteum
- Supraspinatus
- LHB
- SHB
- Prism weakness
ANSWER: C (LHB)
- 2010, 2012
- JAAOS - Pediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures
- “it should be noted that, in up to 9.4% of surgical cases, the biceps tendon can be interposed in the fracture site and may require an open incision to successfully reduce the fracture before pinning”
- 16yo female with isolated forearm fracture. You are shown an xray of patient with closed physes, anterior radial head dislocation, middle 1/3 ulna fracture and very distal ulna fracture (about 2 cm from distal ulna). What is the best treatment?
(This pic but also a distal ulna fracture)
- Closed reduction of ulna and radial head with a well molded above elbow cast in supination
- Closed reduction and intramedullary nail ulna and closed reduction of radial head
- Open reduction and internal fixation of ulna and radius
- Closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation of ulna with closed redution of radius.
ANSWER: C (ORIF since closed physis = adult)
2013
- JAAOS 1998 - Monteggia Fractures in Children and Adults
- Transverse and short oblique fractures are adequately treated with intra-medullary wire fixation
- Intramedullary fixation rarely provides the precise anatomic reduction that can be achieved with a plate and should not be used in adult Monteggia injuries
- Type 2 Monteggia in 10 yr old, radial head dislocated posteriorly (no x-ray). How to treat.
- reduce with flexion and pronation and pressure on radial head, above elbow cast in flexion and pronation
- reduce in flexion/supination with pressure on radial head, cast above elbow in flexion/supination
- reduce with extension and pressure on radial head, cast above elbow in extension
- open reduction with k-wire across radiocapitellar joint
ANSWER: C (in extension and direct post pressure)
- 2009
Rockwood and Greens:
- Anterior and Lateral Dislocations –> Flexion and supination for reduction
- Posterior –> longitudinal traction, direct pressure
Lovell and Winter Page 1755
- Treatment depends on the character of the ulnar fracture because stable, anatomic reduction of the ulna can maintain anatomic reduction of the radial head. Most Monteggia injuries in children younger than 12 years can be managed successfully by closed reduction and above-elbow casting. For a type I injury, the elbow is flexed >90 degrees with the forearm supinated. For a type II injury, the radial head may be best located in elbow extension and forearm supination (148, 149). Type III injuries are treated with a varus reduction, but are often difficult to treat with casting alone. Weekly follow-up with good quality elbow radiographs is suggested for 2 to 3 weeks to detect any recurrent radial head subluxation. Transient nerve palsies, most commonly of the posterior interosseous nerve, occur in approximately 10% of patients.
- Undisplaced lateral condyle fracture in a child. What is the next best treatment?
- Cast and follow up within a week
- Arthrogram
- ORIF
- MRI
ANSWER: A (Cast and f/u)
- 2008, 2013
- JAAOS 2011 - Lateral Condyle Fractures
- Undisplaced fractures (<2mm)
- Unclear prevalence: 6-69% of fractures
- Some argue for fixation no matter what –> state that the undisplaced fracture is exceedingly rare, just an imaging problem (Flynn JPO 1989, hardacre JA JBJS 1971, Badelon O JPO 1988)
- Some also claim they should be fixed for high rates of non-union (Flynn JPO 1989, Conner AN JBJS 1970, Speed J JBJS 1933, Fontanetta P J Trauma 1978)
- Undisplaced fractures (<2mm)
- Displaced (>2mm) or rotated
- CRPP:
- 2-4mm displacement
- Avoids soft tissue stripping (non-union, osteonecrosis)
- ORIF
- Significantly rotated or displaced
- Usually Kocher approach
- Risk of non-union due to soft tissue stripping
- No stripping posteriorly!!
- Fixation with wires usually
- Be careful with 3 wires –> increased loss of motion and lateral spurs
- Charles - Dissection is usually done for you
- CRPP:
- 6 year-old girl presents to your emergency department with a type III supracondylar fracture of the elbow. She has a cold, blue hand with no pulses. She is also unable to flex her thumb. You do your closed reduction and pinning in the operating room. When you seen her in the PACU, her hand is warm, pink, and has no pulse. She is still unable to flex her thumb. What is the best treatment at this point?
- Observe with close follow-up
- Bring back to OR for artery and nerve exploration
- Angio
- Remove K-wires
ANSWER: A (Observe with close f/u)
2012
JAAOS 2012 - Management of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures In Children
- A 4 yo boy has a Type III supracondylar fracture with a cold and pulseless hand. What is most true?
- After closed reduction, an angiogram is always needed
- It often takes 24 hours after reduction for a Doppler pulse to return.
- If a pulse doesn’t return, it can be ignored if the hand is otherwise well perfused.
- A complete occlusion of the brachial artery necessitates immediate reconstruction.
ANSWER: C (ok if warm perfused hand)
2008, 2013
Don’t like the wording here.
Robb JE (JBJS Br 2009) The pink, pulseless hand after supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children
Mangat described 19 kids with grade III treated at 6 hours from injury
11 were observed –> pulse returned at 24 hours (2), 3 weeks (3), 1-3 months (2)
- What is true regarding a type III supracondylar humerus fracture in a pediatric patient?
- Limited remodeling for translational deformity
- Splinting in 120 degrees of flexion to maintain reduction is acceptable
- Equivalent outcomes with lateral and crossed pinning
- These require emergent surgical management
- ANSWER - A (limited remodelling for translational deformity) vs C (depends on wording of question on exam)
- 2014
- Urgent, but not emergent management
- The Treatment of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012;20:320-327
- 2 lateral pins are clinically but NOT biomechanically equivalent to a crossed-pin construct - 3 lateral pins are equally strong as a crossed-pin construct; medial pin has an increased risk of ulnar nerve injury (NNH = 20)
- Translational deformity has minimal remodelling potential and can lead to cubitus varus - the only acceptable deformity is angulation; rotation is also bad
- Splinting in hyperflexion increases the risk of compartment syndrome
- The AAOS guideline suggests closed reduction with pin fixation for patients with displaced (eg, Gartland types II and III and displaced flexion) pediatric supracondylar fractures of the humerus.
- The AAOS guideline suggests the practitioner might use two or three laterally introduced pins to stabilize the reduction of displaced pediatric supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Considerations of potential harm indicate that the physician might avoid the use of a medial pin.
- Which of the following does not cause cubitus varus following SC #?
- Flexion type
- Inadequate reduction
- Loss of fixation
- Underappreciation of medial comminution
ANSWER: A (flexion type)
- 2009
- Flexion type supra-condylars develop cubitus VALGUS
- All of the following are true regarding a fishtail deformity of the distal humerus, except:
- Associated with supracondylar humerus fracture
- Results from central physeal growth arrest
- Predisposes to early ulnohumeral degenerative changes
- Results in significant humeral length deficiency
- ANSWER: D (not true - it does not result in sig humeral length deficiency)
- 2015
- Glotzbecker MP (JPO 2013) Fishtail deformity of the distal humerus: a report of 15 cases
- Proposed etiologies for fishtail deformity include avascular necrosis of traumatic and idiopathic origin and/or premature physeal arrest.
- It can occur after displaced or minimally displaced supracondylar humerus fractures, lateral condylar fractures, physeal separations, or medial condylar fractures
- It can also be caused iatrogenically from excessive soft tissue stripping posteriorly, posterior approaches to the lateral distal humerus, or misdirected pin passes or instrumentation placed posteriorly on the humerus.
- Despite the fact that multiple different types of fractures may lead to this complication, the humeral deficiency seen in cases of fishtail deformity generally develops in the lateral aspect of the medial crista, trochlear groove and/or apex, which lends further support to a vascular etiology
- In the short term, there are often minimal or no symptoms. When patients present, they may present with joint malalignment, and they often complain of pain and loss of motion secondary to joint incongruity and locking, which is related to loose body formation and joint instability.The few studies with long-term follow-up have demonstrated a high incidence of functional disability including pain and/or loss of motion.
- Radiographically, in our series, loss of motion was associated with subluxation of the radial head. With proximal migration of the ulna, the coronoid impinges anteriorly and olecranon impinges posteriorly, leading to progressive loss of motion. Furthermore, the finding of radial head subluxation/dislocation is a radiographic sign that the proximal migration of the ulna is substantial enough to cause both loss of flexion-extension as well as radial head dislocation.
- Joint incongruity leads to osteochondral impingement and risk of loose bodies and arthrosis.
- Gross, I actually read this paper yesterday and thought I totally wasted my time. Glad to see there is actually a question from it!
- 12 yo boy shows up at your cast clinic 10 days after an injury with a SH II distal radius fracture. He is splinted and has 15 degrees inclination and 50 degrees apex volar angulation. What do you do?
- Molded short arm cast and follow up regularly
- Closed reduction and Molded short arm cast and follow up regularly
- Open reduction and pinning
- Open reduction and plate
ANSWER: A
- 2009, 2012
- Difficult to find evidence….pretty much assuming this is a SHII injury
- Late re-reduction associated with damage to physis but time course difficult to sort out..7-14 days.
- If not a physeal injury then reduction would be appropriate
- If it is a physeal injury then ideally would do CRPP with the reduction, so I prefer A
- What is the best predictor of re-displacement in a distal radius and ulna fracture in a 7yo:
- Ulnar styloid fracture
- Cast index of 0.7
- Bayonet apposition
- Triple point index/Three point mould
ANSWER: D
- 2015
- Alemdaroglu KB (JBJS 2006) Risk Factors in Redisplacement of Distal Radius Fractures in Children
- Kamat AS (JPO 2012) Redefining the cast index: the optimum technique to reduce re-displacement
- “In patients with CIs of ≤ 0.8, the displacement rate was only 5.58%. However, in patients with CIs of ≥ 0.81, the displacement rate was 26%. A high CI was the sole factor that was significantly higher in the redisplacement group. No statistically significant difference was seen for age, sex, or surgeon seniority. Statistical differences were not noted in initial angular deformity or initial displacement.”
- 12 yr F with # radius. Comes back with a dystrophic looking pseudoarthrosis. What would you find on exam?
- hypoplastic thumb
- café au lait spots
- absent pec major
- Clinodactyly
ANSWER: B (café au lait spots )
- 2008, 2011, 2012
- Presumably pseudoarthrosis associated with NF1
- Several case reports in literature
- Kameyama O (JPO 1990), Gregg PJ (COR 1982)
- 50% of forearm pseudarthosis are associated with NF1 (but only a small percentage of NF1 get forearm pseudarthrosis)
- What is true. Both bones forearm # 10deg rotational malunion in the forearm?
- A midshaft malunion will result in more decreased pronation
- A midshaft malunion will result in more decreased supination
- A distal malunion will result in more decreased pronation
- A distal malunion will result in more decreased supination
ANSWER: B (A midshaft malunion will result in more decreased supination )
- 2009
- Rockwood and Greens:
- “They observed a significantly greater loss of ROM in forearms with middle-third deformities than with distal-third deformities, with more supination being lost than pronation. They also observed a significant decrease of ROM with 15° of angulation. The greater decrease of ROM in middle-third deformities was attributed to the loss of the radial bow where the two forearm bones overlap at the extremes of pronation and supination”
- Charles’ theory: proximal to supinator insertion = supinator supinates distal fragment, = decrease supination
- What is least likely to cause compartment syndrome when putting on a hip spica cast for a femur fracture in an 8 yo
- Placing the below knee portion first and using it to place traction on the thigh
- Placing the spica in the seated position with the hip and knee at 90 degrees
- Including the foot in the spica
- Placing a spica with hip and knee flexed less than 90-90
ANSWER: D
- 2013
- Mubarak SJ (JPO 2006) Volkmann contracture and compartment syndromes after femur fractures in children treated with 90/90 spica casts
- After child awakes from anesthesia the thigh muscles contract and the leg slips back in the cast
- Causes pressure at the corners of the cast
- Large TM (JBJS 2003) Compartment syndrome of the leg after treatment of a femoral fracture with an early sitting spica cast
- “if the foot is casted then it is not available for monitoring of the compartments
- But doesn’t cause the compartment syndrome
- Systematic review of spica casting for the treatment of paediatric diaphyseal femur fractures (J Child Orthop 2018;12:136-144 ) - This author recommended casting the hip and knee both at 45°, not elevating the cast, and not applying traction on the below-knee cast portion during application of the cast after reduction of the fracture.
- What is the risk of osteonecrosis in a pediatric displaced trans-cervical hip fracture?
- 100%
- 60%
- 30%
- 15%
ANSWER: C (30%)
- 2014
- JAAOS 2009 - Hip Fractures in Children
- Delbet Classification:
- Trans-physeal Fractures
- Trans-cervical Fractures
- Cervicotrochanteric Fractures
- Intertrochanteric Fractures
- Moon (JOT 2006) Risk Factors for Avascular Necrosis after Femoral Neck Fractures in children
- 360 cases in meta-analysis
- Riley PM (JOT 2015) Earlier Time to Reduction Did Not Reduce Rates of Femoral Head Osteonecrosis in Pediatric Hip Fractures
- ON Rates:
- Type 1 - 67%
- Type 2 - 31%
- Type 3 - 14%
- Type 4 - 5%
- ON Rates:
- What has increased rate of ON in pediatric femoral neck fracture?
- age
- Delbet IV
- fracture displacement
- Gender
ANSWER: A and C
- 2011
- Moon (JOT 2006) Risk Factors for Avascular Necrosis after Femoral Neck Fractures in children
- Fracture type, displacement, age and treatment were all statistically independent predictors of AVN
- With logistic regression analysis fracture type and age only predictors
- Older kids 1.14x more likely to get AVN per year of age
- Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1160–1167.
- We found that age (p = 0.006) and initial displacement (p = 0.001) were significant independent risk factors.
- JAAOS 2020 - initial fracture displacement, older age, fracture type
- Pediatric patient with midshaft femoral fracture. You plan to do retrograde femur elastic nailing. What % of the canal at the isthmus should you fill with your elastic nails?
- 60%
- 70%
- 80%
- 90%
ANSWER: C (80%)
- 2012
- JAAOS - IM Nailing of pediatric femoral shaft fractures
- Use 2 nails with combined diameter equal to 80% of narrowest diameter
- Greater stiffness at fracture, BUT increases malreduction and rotational(posterior gapping and malalignment)
- Each nail 40%
- Sizes 1.5-4.0mm
- A 5yo with a femur fracture is treated with a spica cast. What is an unacceptable deformity?
- 25 degrees malrotation
- 2.5cm shortening
- 20 degrees coronal plane angulation
- 20 degrees sagittal plane angulation
ANSWER: B (2.5 cm shortening not acceptable)
- 2014
- 2009 AAOS Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Pediatric Diaphyseal Femur Fractures
- We suggest early spica casting or traction with delayed spica casting for children age six months to five years with a diaphyseal femur fracture with less than 2 cm of shortening. Level of Evidence: II Grade of Recommendation: B
- We are unable to recommend for or against using any specific degree of angulation or rotation as a criterion for altering the treatment plan when using the spica cast in children six months to five years of age. Level of Evidence: V Grade of Recommendation: Inconclusive
- Management of Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures. JAAOS. 2004.
- Generally, for children aged 2 to 10 years, acceptable fracture alignment at union is ≤15° of varus or valgus angulation, ≤20° of anterior or posterior angulation, and ≤30° of malrotation. Overgrowth may vary with the age of the child, the fracture pattern and location, the amount of shortening, and possibly the treatment method. In children aged 2 to 10 years, overgrowth averages 0.9 cm (range, 0.4 to 2.5 cm). Shortening at union should be no more than 1.5 cm to 2.0 cm. No more than 1.0 cm of shortening is recommended for older children.
- 54kg kid with a diaphyseal femur fracture. What is the most appropriate treatment?
- Ex-fix
- Rigid IM nail
- Flexible IM nail
- Submuscular plate
ANSWER: D
- B or D depending on age of patient > 10 – rigid nail, < 10 submuscular plate
- 2015
- JAAOS 2011 - IM nailing of pediatric femoral shaft fracture
- JAAOS 2012 - Submuscular plating of pediatric femur fractures
- Flexible nails have a worse outcome with age > 11 years or weight > 50kg, consider bracing or augmenting with brace
- If Skeletally mature, then would do rigid IM nail, otherwise sub-muscular plating
- What artery is commonly implicated in compartment syndrome in tibial tubercle fractures:
- Anterior tibial recurrent
- Peroneal artery
- Inferior patellar
- Posterior tibial recurrent
ANSWER: A (Anterior tibial recurrent artery)
- 2015
- JAAOS - Pediatric Knee Dislocations and Physeal Fractures About the Knee
- “disruption of the anterior tibial recurrent artery can result in bleeding into the anterior compartment of the leg, leading to compression of the anterior tibial artery and deep peroneal nerve”
- In a pediatric tibial spine/eminence fracture, all of the following are true, except:
- ACL laxity and instability is a common complication and can cause functional impairment
- Meniscal and chondral injuries are not associated
- Associated with a larger femoral intercondylar notch
ANSWER: A/B
- JAAOS 2015 Complications of Tibial Eminence and Diaphyseal fractures in children
- JAAOS 2010 Tibial Eminence Fractures
- ACL Laxity (Willis RB JPO 1993)
- 74% have laxity on KT-1000, rarely subjectively a problem
- Laxity more prevalent in non-op patients
- Therefore A is TRUE
- Kocher (AJSM 2003)
- 65% of type III have meniscal entrapment (26% type II) BUT only 3% had meniscal tears – “therefore do not appear to be commonly associated with anterior meniscal or inter-meniscal ligament entrapment”
- Feucht MJ (KSSTA 2016)
- Meniscal injuries in 37%
- 30% of injuries were posterior horn longitudinal tear
- Associated with higher age, advanced Tanner stage, pubescence
- Kocher (JPO 2004) ACL injury vs tibial spine fracture in the skeletally immature knee
- ACL injury had narrower notch indices than tibial spine fracture group
- Therefore C is TRUE
- A 4 year old has a proximal tibia fracture. What deformity may occur?
- Varus
- Valgus
- Procurvatum
- Recurvatum
ANSWER: B (valgus)
- 2009
- Cozen’s fracture
- What is true regarding pediatric tibia fractures?
- The average 11yr old will have 10mm of overgrowth
- 10° of coronal displacement in an 8yr old will remodel adequately
- 10° of rotation is unacceptable in any age
- the proximal tibial physis growth will be affected even with distal fractures
ANSWER: B
- 2008
- Lovell and Winter:
- Average overgrowth 5-7mm, almost no overgrowth in girls >8/boys >10
- Kids <6 15o acceptable angulation, Kids > 6 10o acceptable
- No guidelines for rotation, but won’t remodel much
- With regards to triplane fractures in children?
- Results from lateral rotation
- Occurs because posteromedial physis closes first
- High risk of growth arrest
- Cannot happen with growth plates are fully open
ANSWER: A (lateral rotation aka ER)
- 2012
- Rang’s = SER mechanism
- Clement DA (JBJS 1987) Triplane fracture of the distal tibia. A variant in cases with an open growth plate
- “We have reviewed 15 cases of triplane fracture of the distal tibia. The mechanism of injury is lateral rotation and the anatomical pattern of the fracture depends on the state of the growth plate at the time of injury. In seven of our cases the anteromedial part of the growth plate was fused, but in eight children the plate was completely open.”
- “In six of these eight children there was a hump or projection of the medial growth plate. It is suggested that this hump (kump’s hump) stabilises the anteromedial part of the epiphysis in a manner similar to the partial anteromedial fusion seen in older children, and that this accounts for the occurrence of triplane fracture in the presence of an open growth plate.”
- JAAOS triplane fractures
- This closure proceeds from central to anteromedial to posteromedial and, finally, to the lateral portion of the epiphysis, leaving the unfused portions vulnerable to injury. The anterolateral physis is the last to close.
- These fractures also have been termed transitional fractures. This injury usually does not occur in patients younger than age 10 years or older than age 16.7 years, but there are case reports of both.
- Which portion of the distal tibial physis is the last to fuse?
- Anterolateral
- Central
- Anteromedial
- Posteromedial
ANSWER: A
- 2012
- JAAOS triplane fractures
- This closure proceeds from central to anteromedial to posteromedial and, finally, to the lateral portion of the epiphysis, leaving the unfused portions vulnerable to injury. The anterolateral physis is the last to close.
- List 3 radiographic features of C2-3 pseudosubluxation (2009, 2012, 2014)
JAAOS 2011 - Pediatric Cervical Spine Trauma
- Spinalaminar line within 1.5mm
AAOS Core Review:
- Reduces with extension
- <4mm subluxation is normal
- No soft-tissue swelling
- List 4 ways in which radiographs of the cervical spine in children differ from those of skeletally mature patients? (2015)
- AAOS Core Review 2/OKU Peds 3
- Increased ADI (>5mm abnormal)
- Pseudosubluxation of C2-C3
- Loss of cervical lordosis
- Widened retropharyngeal space (>6mm C2, >22mm at C6)
- Wedging of cervical vertebral bodies
- Neurocentral synchondroses (closure by age 7)
- JAAOS Pediatric Cervical Spine Trauma:
- Relative Horizontal Facets
- Flat Unicate processes (
- Give 3 considerations for safe application of a pediatric Halo (2013, 2014)
JAAOS 2007 - Halo Fixator:
- CT indicated in kids under 10 to determine bone thickness and rule out cranial fractures
- Greater number of pins (10-12)
- Torque at 2 in-lb
Miller:
6-8pins @ 2-4 inch-lbs
- 4 risk factors for SMA syndrome in peds scoliosis (2012)
Braun SV (JBJS 2006) SMA syndrome following spinal deformity correction
BMI < 25th percentile
<60% correction of thoracic curve on bending film
Lenke Lumbar Modifier B or C
Two stage procedure
Thoracoplasty
Combined anterior and posterior fusion
- What are the 3 components of the Lenke classification for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? (3 lines only!) (2013)
Lenke LG (JBJS 2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spine arthrodesis
- Curve Type (Identify structural curves)
- Thoracic Sagittal Modifier
- Lumbar Modifier
14 yr old female with Right Thoracic curve and Left lumbar curve.
List 3 radiographic features that are suggestive that this is a structural curve.
Lenke LG (JBJS 2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spine arthrodesis
- Largest Cobb Measurement
- Side Bending Cobb >25o
- Segmental Kyphosis > 20o
- Give 3 findings in the cervical spine in a patient with Down’s Syndrome (2011, 2014)
JAAOS 2006 Down’s Syndrome
- Atlantoaxial Instability
- Atlanto-occipital instability
- Odontoid Hypoplasia/Os Odontoideum
- *NO subaxial instability
- Give 3 factors to consider when performing a selective thoracic fusion in AIS (2016)
JAAOS 2013 Choosing Fusion Levels in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
General:
- Preserving motion segments
- Preventing junctional kyphosis
- Shoulder imbalance
Or Maybe:
- Location of Curve
- Lumbar Modifier
- Truncal Rotation
- List 5 radiographic findings in the cervical spine in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (2.5pts) (2016)
Lovell and Winter (really distinct list - 7th Ed p880)
Radiographic Features:
- Anterior erosion of odontoid
- AP erosion of odontoid (apple-core)
- Subluxation of C1 on C2
- Focal soft tissue calcification adjacent to the ring of C1 anteriorly
- Ankylosis of apophyseal joints
- Growth abnormalities
- Subluxation between C2 and C7
ASA GAFS
42.List 4 predictors of instability and deformity in pediatric tuberculosis of the spine (2 pts.) (2016)
JAAOS 2015 - Ganulomatous Vertebral Osteomyelitis’
Rajasekaran S (JBJS BR 2001) Natural history of post-tubercular kyphosis in chidlren
At Risk signs for progressive kyphotic deformity in children:
- Gapping of the facet joints
- Retropulsion of infected vertebra in relation to adjacent normal levels
- Lateral listhesis
- Toppling
- List 4 risk factors for progression in infantile scoliosis (2016)
JAAOS 2015 - Nonsurgical Management of Early-onset Scoliosis
- Cobb Angle > 20
- Intra-spinal pathology
- Rib Phase (phase 2 rib)
- Rib Vertebral Angle Difference > 20
- Three reasons for progression of congenital kyphosis (2012)
JAAOS 2004 - Congenital Scoliosis
• Failure of Formation
• Failure of Segmentation
• Mixed Deformity
Or maybe:
• Anterior unsegmented bar
• Posterior hemivertebrae
• Mixed failure of segmentation and failure of formation
• I don’t know…
• Richard also has presence of rib fusions.
- 8 organ systems associated with congenital scoliosis (2012)
JAAOS 2004 - Congenital Scoliosis
- CNS - Spinal Dysraphism (18-33%)
- GI - Anorectal Atresia
- Pulmonary - Tracheoesophageal Fistula, Thoracic Insufficiency
- Renal
- Urogenital Anomalies
- Cardiac Defects
- Limb Defects (radial club hand/ thumb hypoplasia)
- Auditory anomalies
- List the 4 Types of Neural Tube Defects (2010)
- Spina bifida occulta
- Meningocele
- Myelomenigocele
- Rachischisis
47. A child with a hemivertebra. What are 3 indications for being able to perform a hemi-epiphysiodesis? (2010)
Hedden D (JBJS 2007) Management Themes in Congenital Scoliosis
- Single hemi-vertebrae
- Deformity < 50o (flexible)
- Child < 5 years (enough remaining growth)
- What are 4 MRI findings of a patient with scoliosis and neurofibromatosis? (2011)
JAAOS 2010 - Orthopedic Manifestations in NF 1
MRI specific findings
- Dural Ectasia (circumferential dilation of the thecal sac, can lead to meningocele)
- Dumbell Lesion (neurofibroma on nerve root)
- Parapinal masses (plexiform neurofibromatosis)
also:
- Vertebral scalloping
- Pencilling ribs
- Rotation of ribs (look like twisted ribbons)
- Enlarged vertebral foramen (from the dumbell lesion)
- Dysplastic Pedicles
- Spindling of the TPs
- Short, Sharp, kyphotic curve
- Severe rotation of apical vertebra
- What are three conditions that have dural ectasia? (2011)
Dural ectasia associations: (MEAN)
- Marfan’s
- Ehler’s Danlos
- Achondroplasia
- Neurofibromatosis
- List 3 spine findings in Achondroplasia. (2011)
JAAOS 2009 - Achondroplasia
- Foramen Magnum Stenosis
- Thoracolumbar Kyphosis
- Lumbosacral hyperlordosis
- Spinal Stenosis
- Short, thick pedicles
- Decreased inter-pedicular distance
- Which is true of pseudosubluxation of cervical spine in pediatric patient?
- Vertical facets
- Posterior vertebral step
- C3-4 subluxation is most common
- Intact posterior spinous line
ANSWER: D
2016
JAAOS 2011 - Pediatric Cervical Spine Trauma
- Pseudosubluxation of C2 on C3 and, occasionally, C3 on C4 is the most prominent anatomic variation in the pediatric cervical spine
- 22% incidence of C2 on C3
- Differentiated by:
- Swischuk line - line drawn posterior arch of C2 within 2 mm of the spinolaminar line at C1-3
- Wedge-shaped vertebral bodies and horizontal orientation of facets may pre-dispose to injury
- “Early onset” scoliosis in a 2 yr old.. All true EXCEPT
- Rib overlap of the costovertebral junction (phase 2 rib) is suggestive of a progressive curve
- Higher chance of progression if the angle is >70°
- Most spontaneously resolve
- RVAD of 20° has a high chance of a non-progressive curve.
ANSWER: D
2013
JAAOS - Infantile Scoliosis
- Spontaneously resolve in a large number of patients (12-92%)
- Risk factors for progression:
- Cobb Angle > 20o
- Intra-spinal pathology (20% if Cobb > 20o)
- Rib Phase - position of medial rib to apical vertebra
- Phase 1 (no overlap)
- Measure Rib Vertebra Angle Difference
- <20o = low risk of progression
- >20o = high risk of progression
- Phase 2 ribs (overlap)
- High risk of progression
- What is not a complication of VEPTR:
- Clavicle fracture
- Rib fracture
- Thoracic outlet syndrome
- Skin breakdown
ANSWER: A
2015
JAAOS - Growth Friendly Spine Surgery
- Complications include wound problems, rib fractures, creeping fusion
- Akbarnia B (Spine 2010) Complications of Growth-Sparing Surgery in Early Onset Scoliosis
- Complications in VEPTR and Rib-Based Distraction Devices
- Anchor problems:
- rib fracture/cradle migration
- Brachial Plexus problems:
- Direct trauma or impingement if implant too lateral and cephalad
- Compression of plexus against upper chest wall and clavicle/humerus at initial distraction and expansion
- Chest Wall Problems:
- Scarring and rib fusions
- Wound Complications and Infection
- Increased thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis
- Iatrogenic thoracic outlet syndrome secondary to vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib expansion thoracoplasty - Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 2008
- Congenital scoli - what is the most common CNS abnormality?
- Diastomyelia
- Chiari
- Tethered cord
- Intradural lipoma
ANSWER: A (old answer C)
2016
Newest evidence suggests diastematomyelia
JAAOS 2004 - Congenital Scoliosis
- 18-37% of patients have spinal dysraphism
- Two recent series have shown tethered cord to be most common form
- Basu (Spine 2002) Congenital spinal deformity: A comprehensive assessment at
- Shen J (Spine 2013) Abnormalities associated with congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of 226 Chinese surgical cases
- 226 congenital scoliosis, 43% intra-spinal abnormalities
- Diastematomyelia most common
- Ghandhari H (Eur Spine J 2015) Vertebral, rib and intraspinal anomalies in congenital scoliosis: a study of 202 Caucasians
- Most common anomalies diastematomyelia (36%), syringomyelia (18.2%)
- All of the following are associated w/ congenital thoracic scoliosis except:
- Conductive hearing loss
- Obstructive uropathy
- VATER
- Tethered cord
ANSWER: A
2009
JAAOS - Congenital Scoliosis:
Anomaly may be part of VATER
“20% have existing urologic anomaly that may be asymptomatic. Renal and renal collecting system problems can vary from an asymptomatic unilateral absent kidney to obstructive uropathy”
- Juvenile scoliosis. Incidence of neuroaxis abnormalities?
- less than 10%
- 15% to 30%
- 45% to 60%
- greater than 60%
ANSWER: B
2011
Spine 1988 - Incidence of neural axis abnormalities in infantile and juvenile patients with spinal deformity
Juvenile incidence is 20-25%
- Highest Rate of progression for congenital Scoliosis
- Hemivertebrae
- Unilateral unsegmented Bar
- Double hemivertebrae
- Wedge
ANSWER: B (certainly dependent on exact question)
2012
McMaster MJ (JBJS 1982) The natural history of congential scoliosis: a study of two hundred and fifty-one patients
Block Vertebrae <2°/yr
Wedge Vertebra <2°/yr
Hemi-vertebra 2-5°/yr
Unilateral Bar 5-6°/yr
Unilateral Bar + Hemi 5-10°/yr
- Congenital kyphosis – which is true:
- type 2 more likely to cause neurologic problems
- amenable to bracing
- most likely cause of non-infectious paraplegia
ANSWER: C
2008
Lovell and Winter:
Classification:
- Failure formation
- Failure segmentation
- Mixed
Neurologic risk higher with types 1 and 3
Bracing only for compensator curves
- When would you brace a congenital scoli?
- progressive curve 2° to unsegmented bar
- progressive curve 2° to hemivertebra
- flexible compensatory curve below congenital curve
- 13 decree scoli with kyphosis
ANSWER: C
2011
Parson-ism
JAAOS Congenital Scoliosis:
- Primary bracing of congenital scoliosis is rarely indicated because braces do not affect progression of curve
- Sometimes can be used to control compensatory curves
- A 5yo female with congenital scoliosis, L5 fully segmented hemivertebrae with 50 degree LS angle. What is the best treatment?
- L5 hemiepiphysiodesis
- L5 vertebrectomy
- Anterior and posterior fusion
- Posterior fusion
ANSWER - B
2010, 2014
JAAOS 2004 - Congenital Scoliosis
- Anterior and posterior convex hemiepiphysiodesis is indicated in hemivertebrae when skeletally immature, but curve <40 degrees.
- Need anterior fusion to prevent crankshaft
- A resection of the hemivertebrae is indicated with more severe curves (>40 degrees) and younger patients (best if before age 2 - however multiples articles on ages up to 14 years).
- Excision is recommended if balanced spine can’t be achieved with fusion alone
- Observation only in cases of block vertebrae or wedge vertebrae which can be observed closely until skeletal maturity, as they are at lower risk of curve progression.
- Convex Hemi-epiphysiodesis:
- Contra-indicated in segmentation defects
- Most patients have <15o of correction
- Recommended in patients with curves <40o
- Congenital scoliosis. Which is an indication for hemiepihysiodesis/ hemiarthrodesis?
- Age 5 to 10
- Unilateral bar
- Curve less than 50
- Thoracic kyphosis
ANSWER: C
2011
Lovell and Winter:
Results for hemi-epiphysiodesis are variable but better in kids younger than 5 with isolated lumbar hemi with progressive curve <40-50o
- Regarding SCIWORA, what is true?
- 50% can be a delayed presentation
- most common in the T spine
- infantile cord can stretch 2 inches before rupture
- most commonly seen in 8-15yo
ANSWER: A
2010, 2012
AAOS Core Review 2
- Cause of paralysis in approximately 20-30% of children with injuries to the spinal cord
- 20-50% of patients have delayed onset neurologic symptoms or late neurologic deterioration
- Kids under age 10 are more likely to have permanent paralysis
- JAAOS 2011 - Pediatric Cervical Spine Trauma
- SCIWORA occurs in 18% to 38% of pediatric cervical spine injuries, and the incidence tends to be higher in young children.
- The mechanism of injury likely relates to the flexibility of the pediatric spine, which is greater than that of the spinal cord.
- It is believed that the spinal column can stretch up to 2 inches, whereas the spinal cord may rupture when stretched <1 cm.
- A 14yo male is post-op from a posterior spinal instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. All blood loss was meticulously replaced by the anesthetist in the OR. He has a hemovac and foley in place. He is oliguric in PACU and for 24 hours post-op despite IV at maintenance and with replacement. What is the cause of his oliguria?
- Excessive hemovac losses not reported by nursing
- Retroperitoneal hematoma
- Hypernatremia
- Decreased urine output with renal sodium excretion
ANSWER - D
2012, 2014
Medical complications in scoliosis surgery. Shapiro, Gary MD; Green, Daniel William MD; Fatica, Nunzia S. MD; Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba MD. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 13(1):36-41, February 2001
Several medical complications can occur after scoliosis surgery in children and adolescents. They include the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone; pancreatitis; cholelithiasis; superior mesenteric artery syndrome; ileus; pneumothorax; hemothorax; chylothorax; and fat embolism.
Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion in children following spinal fusion. Lieh-Lai MW; Stanitski DF; Sarnaik AP; Uy HG; Rossi NF; Simpson PM; Stanitski CL. Critical Care Medicine. 27(3):622-7, 1999 Mar.
Antidiuretic hormone (ADH) is secreted by the hypothalamus and controls water metabolism. It is released from the posterior pituitary in response to increased serum osmolality, and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in intravascular volume. In the absence of increased serum osmolality or decreased intravascular volume, the secretion of ADH in excess of the physiologic range is considered inappropriate.
Inappropriately high levels of ADH lead to excessive retention of free water and hyponatremia, which can result in fluid shifts into the intracellular fluid compartment and cerebral edema.
The elevated urinary sodium concentration associated with SIADH is thought to be caused by the action of ADH in the distal tubules, resulting in excessive reabsorption of free water and increased urinary osmolal concentration. More recently, it has been postulated that the increase in intravascular volume results in right atrial stretch, directly stimulating the release of atrial natriuretic peptide from atrial myocytes. The resultant expansion of extracellular fluid further leads to decreased proximal tubular reabsorption of sodium.
SIADH is thought to occur after spinal procedures because of stress, blood loss, invasion of the dura, and traction on the neural pathways.
Treatment for SIADH is fluid restriction and monitoring of serum and urine electrolytes and osmolality. If it is not recognized, sustained low-volume urine may be confused with hypovolemia, and increased fluid may be given. This can result in worsening hyponatremia, which can lead to pulmonary edema, cerebral edema, convulsions, coma, and death.
- Duchenne’s kid, 13 years old, scoliosis cobb angle 35 degrees, FEV 55%. Tx?
- wheelchair modifications
- bracing
- anterior + posterior fusion
- posterior only fusion
ANSWER - D
2012, 2014
JAAOS 2002. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
In the 90% to 95% of patients with DMD who do develop scoliosis, the best treatment is early spinal fusion with internal fixation. They should be screened for the development of scoliosis by regular sitting anteroposterior spine radiographs, beginning at about age 10 years. When curvature is ascertained and reaches a Cobb angle of 20° to 30°, fusion should be done without delay.
Bracing or special seating systems may delay curve progression but will not prevent it.
there are marked disadvantages to spinal bracing and delaying surgery
First, spinal deformity is neither preventable nor responsive to nonsurgical modalities such as bracing and adaptive seating and ultimately will cause disabling deformity and severe impairment of pulmonary function… all curves in DMD progress, usually to a severe degree
sufficient spinal growth will have occurred in the child with DMD by age 10 or 11 years so that posterior fusion will not result in a marked loss of trunk height or development of crankshaft deformity.
With progression of the disease, the paraspinal muscles in these patients are progressively replaced by stiff, unyielding fibrofatty tissue, which makes the surgical dissection more difficult, reduces correctability, and increases intraoperative blood loss.
Finally, the most notable complication of surgery is postoperative pulmonary insufficiency. Patients who have a forced vital capacity of <35% (which usually occurs at age 15 years) are at high risk for pulmonary complications, whereas patients who have a forced vital capacity of >50% are likely to have no postoperative pulmonary problems and can be weaned from the ventilator the night of surgery or the morning after surgery.
Therefore, the older the patient at the time of surgery, the greater the risk of serious postoperative pulmonary complications.
For these reasons, when the curvature exceeds 20°, patients should be offered surgery.
- What is not true about achondroplasia and spine?
- Atlantoaxial instability
- foramen magnum stenosis
- Lumbar Hyperlordosis
- Thoracolumbar kyphosis
ANSWER: A
2014
JAAOS 2009 - Achondroplasia: Manifestations and Treatment
Foramen magnum stenosis is associated with achondroplasia. It most commonly presents and requires treatment by age 2. It’s recommended to screen all infants with MRI or CT for foramen magnum stenosis.
Up to 80% of patients have increased limbo-sacral hyperlordosis, owing to excessive anterior pelvic tilt.
87% of patients between 1 and 2 years have thoracolumbar kyphosis. It’s is usually self-limiting as truncal muscles get stronger by walking age. Recommended to limit unsupported sitting before age 1.
- A 12yo female presents with several months of back pain which is limiting her ability to participate in sports. After a complete history and physical exam, what is the most appropriate initial investigation?
- Plain radiographs
- SPECT-CT
- MRI
- Technetium bone scan
ANSWER: A
2008, 2014
JAAOS 2016 - Evaluation and Diagnosis of Back Pain in Children
Radiographs of the entire spine with the patient erect, standing position are indicated when the history or physical exam reveals localized pain, a neurologic deficit or clinical deformity
SPECT-CT sensitive and specific for spondylosis
MRI if a soft tissue problem is suspected
66% of patients have no cause identified
- All of the following are risk factors for failure of brace treatment in AIS, except:
- Thoracic lordosis
- Smoking
- Obesity
- Male
ANSWER: B
2015
Chiller JR (CORR 2010) Brace management in AIS
Karol LA (Spine 3002), Yrjonen (Eur Spine J 2007) - 35-38% of males uncompliant with their braces
- Younger patients more compliant
- It is these characteristics that cause bracing in the overweight patient to be ineffective and lead to increased curve progression compared with patients who are not overweight (Moreland M Curr Opin Orthop 1998, O’Neill PJ JBJS 2005)
- Reference Manual for Boston Scoliosis Brace
- Thoracic hypokyphosis (0o – 20° thoracic kyphosis) is a common feature in idiopathic scoliosis, and true thoracic lordosis (< 0° thoracic kyphosis) is probably a contraindication to bracing.
- https://www.bostonoandp.com/Customer-Content/www/CMS/files/BostonBraceManual.pdf
- 11 yr old girl has 23 deg scoliosis. She is pre-pubertal. You send her away for 4 months to do physio. Her scoli hasn’t changed. What do you do?
- Boston Brace
- Milwaukee Brace
- Reassure patient / parents / FU in 4 months
- Posterior fusion
ANSWER: C
2009
I’m somewhat torn in this case. BRAIST trial used 20o as bracing cut off, but if she isn’t changing then short-interval follow up very reasonable
TLSO if apex at T7 or below
Jess thinks brace because she is going to hit her growth spurt soon. If you start noticing a change and it takes a few months to get a brace made, it might be too late… But I can see both sides. Hopefully will be more clear on real Q
- All of the following are associated with C1-2 instability, except:
- Achondroplasia
- Pseudoachondroplasia
- Mucopolysaccharidosis
- Down’s syndrome
ANSWER: A
2015, 2014, 2013
JAAOS 2009 Achondroplasia
Foramen magnum stenosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbosacral hyperlordosis, spinal stenosis
JAAOS 2006 - Down’s Syndrome
Atlantoaxial instability, atlanto-occipital instability, scoliosis
JAAOS - Non-traumatic upper cervical spine instability in children
- Syndromes associated with spine instability:
- Connective tissue –> Down’s, Marfan, Ehler-Danlos, Larsen
- Skeletal Dysplasia –> SED, diastrophic, Kniest, Chondrodysplasia punctata, metatrophic dysplasia, mucopolysaccharidoses
- 12 yr boy with T4-T12 (Scheuermann) kyphosis of 70 degrees. What is the treatment?
- PT
- Fusion
- Boston Brace
- Milwakee Brace
ANSWER: D
2011
Lovell and Winter:
- The Milwaukee brace is the brace recommended for the treatment of Scheuermann’s Disease
- Can use Boston if apex T9 or lower
- Indications for bracing:
- 50-70o curve
- Riser 0-3
- Curve that is 40-50% correctable in brace
- Poor prognosticators:
- Curves > 75o
- Wedging > 10o
- Patient near or past skeletal maturity
- OR:
- Controversial indications
- Progressive kyphosis > 75o
- Pain not alleviated with conservative measures
- L1 chance fracture in 14 year old. Had seatbelt sign and abdo pain. Most likely injury
- Duodenum
- Spleen
- Liver
- Pancreas
ANSWER: A
2008
J Pediatric Surg 2001 - Abdominal injuries associated with thoracolumbar fractures after MVC
The seatbelt syndrome described in 1962 by Garrett and Branstein is characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of lumbar spine fractures and injuries to the small bowel, colon and occasionally the stomach or pancreas
- Which is NOT a risk factor for progression of scoliosis?
- age
- gender
- thoracic curve
- pain
ANSWER; D
2008, 2009
- Odontoid in children <7 years. All of the following except:
- 25% non-union
- Occurs at synchondrosis between C2 body and dens
- Displacement usually anterior
ANSWER: A
2009
JAAOS 2011 - Pediatric Cervical Spine Trauma
- Typically occur through the synchondrosis of C2
- Kelly et al. Fractures of the axis: a review of pediatric, adult, and geriatric injuries 2016.
- More likely to happen in young <8
- Development of C2 involves ossification of four separate ossification centers consisting of the vertebral body, the odontoid, and right and left facet/pars/lamina. The odontoid process fuses to the vertebral body between 3 and 6 years of age. A secondary ossification center develops at the apex of the odontoid process, fusing by 12 years of age
- Fractures of the odontoid may occur through the odontoidbody synchondrosis. These fractures often heal when treated with halo or Minerva immobilization as the synchondrosis is well vascularlized
- NO mention of non union in kids, just adults
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5127948/pdf/12178_2016_Article_9368.pdf
- What are 3 radiographic findings of ischemic necrosis of the femoral head following DDH treatment? (2015, 2016)
LaMothe Lists (Salter Criteria)
- 1) Failure of appearance or growth of ossific nucleus at 1 year after reduction
- 2) Broadening of femoral neck
- 3) Increased density and fragmentation of ossified femoral head
- 4) Residual deformity of proximal femur after reduction
- 5) Shortening of the femoral neck
- 6) Greater trochanter overgrowth
- 7) Premature physeal closure
- Given an AP x-ray of a right hip (only the right hip, not a pelvis x-ray). In a 6 month old, list 4 radiographic features suggesting DDH (2016)
AAOS Core Review 2 p 669/ JAAOS 2000 DDH from birth to 6 months
- Acetabular index > 25o
- Unossified/delayed ossification of femoral heads
- Rounding of acetabular corners
- Disruption of Shenton’s Line
- Not in inferomedial corner of Perkin/Hilgenreiner’s lines
- Widened acetabular teardrop
- Lateral center edge angle >20o (if femoral head ossified) –> weaker answer
- Unilateral DDH in 8 month old (2010)
- list the most important clinical sign
- list 5 possible blocks to reduction:
list the most important clinical sign
AAOS Core Review 2 (pg 668)
- Range of motion (ROM) testing of the hip is important; a decrease in abduction is the most sensitive test result for DDH. ROM will be normal in children younger than 6 months however, because contractures will not yet have developed
Others: Galeazzi, LLD.
list 5 possible blocks to reduction:
AAOS Core Review p671/Vitale MG JAAOS 2001
Extra-articular:
- Ileopsoas tendon
- Adductor longus
- Contracted hip capsule
Intra-capsular:
- Inverted labrum/neolimbus
- Pulvinar
- Hypertrophied ligamentum teres
- Hypertrophied TAL
- 2 radiographic risk factors for SCFE development (2012)
JAAOS 2006 - SCFE/AAOS Core Revire
- Increased physeal obliquity
- decreased neck-shaft angle
- Decreased femoral anteversion
- Deep acetabulum
- What are 3 endocrine conditions associated with SCFE? (2013)
JAAOS 2006 - SCFE/AAOS Core Review 2
- Hypothyroidism
- Renal osteodystrophy
- Panhypopituitarism
- Growth hormone deficiency treated with growth hormone
- Hyperparathyroidism
- Give 4 indications for consideration of prophylactic pinning of the opposite hip in a child with SCFE. (2011, 2014, 2016)
AAOS Review:
- Young age (open TRC, age < 10 years)
- Endocrinopathy
- Renal Disease
- History of radiation
- High risk of poor follow up (?)
- List 4 clinical or radiographic factors associated with poor prognosis in Perthes. (variations 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014)
JAAOS 2010 - LCP
- Two or more Catterall “Head at Risk” (from top to bottom)
- Femoral head subluxation lateral
- Gage sign
- Lateral epiphysis Calcification
- Horizontal physis
- Metaphyseal cysts
- Female Gender
- Age > 6 at presentation
- Decreased hip ROM
- Lateral Pillar Classification B/C, C
- Premature physeal closure
- Extent of subchondral fracture
- Extent of femoral head/acetabular deformity at maturity
- Give 6 causes of acquired coxa vara in pediatric patient (2011, 2014)
AAOS Review
- Perthes/AVN
- SCFE
- Rickets
- Septic Arthritis/Osteomyelitis
- Trauma
- Fibrous Dysplasia
- Skeletal Dysplasia
- 4 radiographic risk factors for progression of infantile Blount’s (2012)
- Physeal bar across medial physis
- Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal Angle > 16o
- Multi-planar Deformity (varus, procurvatum, IR)
- Beaking of proximal medial tibial metaphysis
- Medial sloping of epiphysis
- Irregular/widened medial physis
- 12yo girl with persistent pain and disability 6mos after an ankle sprain. Apart from fibular collateral ligament injury, what findings will you find on XR or MRI (5 points)? (2015)
Unclear if this is causes attributable to recurrent sprains or causes of lateral ankle pain
- Subtle cavus foot
- Tarsal Coalition
- Peroneal tendon injury
- Anterior process of calcaneus fracture
- Lateral talar process fracture
- Osteochondral fragment
- Syndesmotic Ligament Injury
- 5th metatarsal fracture
- Child with multiple ankle sprains treated non-operatively. Pain in anterolateral aspect of ankle and symptoms for 3 months. No pain with ADLs. Unable to run more than 20 minutes. You are told that he has a tarsal coalition. List 2 treatment options at this time. (2010)
- Immobilization
- Activity Modification
- NSAIDs
- What is an Anatomic Description of CVT? (2012)
JAAOS 2015 - Congenital Vertical Talus
- Dorsal dislocation of the navicular on the talar head
- Hypoplastic and wedge shaped
- Hindfoot is equinus and valgus
- Midfoot and forefoot are dorsiflexed and abducted
- List 3 components of minimally invasive treatment of idiopathic congenital vertical talus. (2012, 2013)
Dobbs, M. B., Purcell, D. B., Nunley, R., & Morcuende, J. A. (2007). Early results of a new method of treatment for idiopathic congenital vertical talus. Surgical technique. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, 89 Suppl 2 Pt.1, 111–121.
- Serial Casting with Reverse Ponsetti Method (plantarflexion and inversion stretching)
- Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy
- Percutaneous pinning of talonavicular joint
- Boots and bars (feet at 0deg)
- 9yo boy with cerebral palsy. Ambulatory with flexible equinovarus deformity. Failed AFO and PT. Weightbearing on lateral border of foot. Persistent pain and wants to discuss operative treatment? (2015)
- What muscles contribute to the deformity?
- What test would help in diagnosis?
- What operative intervention would you suggest?
a) What muscles contribute to the deformity?
- Tib Ant and/ or Tib Post
- Gastroc-soleus causes equinas
b) What test would help in diagnosis?
- Coleman Block test
- Confusion Test
- Patient flexes the hip against resistance
- Foot may show dorsiflexion by cocontraction of anterior tibialis
- Foot will supinate (indicates that tib ant is contributing to supination during gait)
- Can also do dynamic EMG
c) What operative intervention would you suggest?
- TA responsible: Rancho procedure – TP lenthening, TAL, TA split trasnfer to cuboid
- TP responsible: Split posterior tibial tendon transfer into peroneus brevis
- Achilles/Gastroc Lengthening
- 5 yo child with right sided missed congenital hip dislocation. The BEST treatment would be:
- Traction followed by open reduction and innonimate osteotomy
- Traction followed by open reduction
- Open reduction with femoral shortening osteotomy and innominate osteotomy
- Open reduction with innonimate osteotomy
ANSWER: C
2013
Ryan MG (JBJS 1998) One stage treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in children three to ten years old. Functional and radiographic results
- 3yo child, 3mos post innominate osteotomy for DDH. 30deg abduction contracture. Best treatment plan?
- Admit for intensive PT
- Femoral shortening osteotomy
- Traction
- Reassure and do nothing
ANSWER: D
2009, 2015
Bohm P (JBJS 2002) Salter Innominate Osteotomy for the treatment of DDH in Children
After removal of the spica cast, two other hips had a flexion and abduction contracture, which resolved after a short period of physiotherapy
- What is the most reliable method for following CP hips?
- Acetabular index
- Center edge angle
- Migration index
- Tonnis angle
ANSWER:C
2016
Source: Campbells
- Children with risk factors for subluxation or dislocation should be examined and radiographs obtained at 6-month intervals until it can be established that the hips are stable, and then follow-up can be less frequent.
- J Child Orthop. 2013 Hip Surveillance and management of the displaced hip in cerebral palsy
- Hip dislocation in CP is potentially preventable if children are included from an early age in a surveillance programme that includes repeat radiographic and clinical examinations, and preventive treatment for hips that are displacing. A surveillance programme should be based on the child’s age, GMFCS level and migration percentage (MP), and surgical prevention may be considered in children with a MP exceeding 33 %.
- The Reimers’ migration percentage [14] (MP) (Fig. 1) is a valid and reliable measure [13–15], and probably the most commonly used
- SCFE, all is true except
- Only occurs in a narrow age range
- Pin penetration proved to cause chondrolysis
- A chronic slip that has been pinned. Better to wait a few years before an osteotomy procedure.
- 30% in the general population and 70% of renal etiology will have a bilateral slip on initial presentation
ANSWER: C (poor Q)
2013
Lovell and Winter Chapter 25
- A - TRUE
- “most children with SCFE are pre-pubertal….average age of 12 +/-1.5 years for girls and `3.5 +/- 1.7 years for boys…At time of presentation, approximately 80% of boys are between 12-15 and 80% of girls are between 10-13”
- The range of skeletal ages of children with SCFE has been reported to be significantly narrower than the range of their chronologic age
- Previous years thought this was least correct
- B - TRU
- “Walters and Simon alerted the orthopedic community to the risk of unrecognized pin penetration in cases of SCFE treated with in situ fixation, and the associated risk of chondrolysis”
- Millers - Associated with inadvertent pin penetration into the joint
- C - false ??
- Some argument that the proximal femur will remodel and may resolve the problem
- HOWEVER, I think that if you are going to do an osteotomy procedure then you are doing it to protect the cartilage on the acetabulum so you should do it before cartilage damage occurs
- Millers - In severe SCFE, the residual proximal femoral deformity may partially remodel with the patient’s remaining growth.
- D - TRUE
- 20% bilateral on initial presentation + 10-20% later development of a contra-lateral slip (not specific for renal)
- Oppenheim WL (JPO 2003) Outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in renal osteodystrophy
- 9/11 (80%) have bilateral involvement
- SCFE what is true
- Two and one screw have the same risk of penetration
- Two and one screw have the same rate of chondrolysis
- Two screws has more torsional rigidity
- Higher risk of chondrolysis when using fully threaded screw
ANSWER: C
2012
JAAOS 2006 - SCFE
- Higher risk of penetration with two screws due to more peripheral location
- Increased penetration correlated with rates of chondrolysis
- Single screw only has 75% of strength of two screws
- No change in chondrolysis with full threaded…
- Segal LS (JPO 2006) Biomechanical analysis of in situ single versus double screw fixation in non-reduced SCFE model
- Double screw fixation was 137% stiffer than single-screw fixation under torsional loading
- Dragoni M (JPO 2012) Biomechanical study of 1mm threaded, 32 mm threaded and fully threaded SCFE screw fixation
- Higher rate of failure at junction of screw/threads with 16mm threads
- No mention of chondrolysis
- SCFE; when is the child predisposed to having the screw head impinge on the labrum?
- 2 screws
- 1 screw if screw head is medial to the intertrochanteric line
- if screw head is distal to LT
- screw distal to apophysis
ANSWER: B
2012, 2014
- Goodwin RC (JPO 2007) Screw head impingement after in situ fixation in moderate and severe SCFE
- Biomechanical study
- AP fluoroscopy revealed that screw heads lateral to the intertrochanteric line were unlikely to impinge on the acetabulum
- 9 yr Boy with Herring B (they said Herring B) hip. What is the best option for management?
- Observation
- ROM
- Containment surgery with either a femoral, pelvic or both
- Petrie casting
ANSWER: C
2012
Herring JA (JPO 2011) LCP disease at 100: a review of evidence-based treatment
Surgical treatment better in kids > 8, lateral pillar B, B/C (A)
- In patients with Perthes, all of these will benefit from a varus derotation osteotomy, except:
- 8 yo with Herring B
- 7 yo with lateralized/subluxed hip
- Epiphyseal slip angle >20% (prob index)
- Performing the osteotomy during initial or fragmentation phase of disease
ANSWER: B
2015, 2016
- B - indicates hinge abduction, therefore a contra-indication to VRDO
- JAAOS – SCFE
- Intertrochanteric Osteotomy:
- Southwick described an osteotomy for a slip 30-70o
- Imhauser osteotomy flexion , abduction (VALGUS), IR
- JAAOS – Perthes:
- Joseph B (JPO 2005) review of 640 Perthes cases, better results with early femoral osteotomies (D)
- Herring JA (JPO 2011) LCP disease at 100: a review of evidence-based treatment
- Surgical treatment better in kids > 8, lateral pillar B, B/C (A)
- ** really not the greatest evidence
- Kamegaya M (J Child Orthop 2008) Arthrographic indicators for decision making about femoral varus osteotomy in Legg-Calve-Perthes disease
- Epiphyseal slip-in index 20 and more associated with Herring B (lower = hinge abduction, herring C)
- Prognostic factors for Perthes - all except
- Age
- Gender
- ROM
- Extent of head involvement
ANSWER: C
2008
JBJS 2004 - LCP Disease. Part II: Prospective multicenter study of the effect of treatment on outcome
- “The lateral pillar classification (p < 0.0001) and the age at the onset of the disease (p = 0.0001) were both strong prognostic factors. Female patients did significantly worse than male patients if they were over the age of 8.0 years at the onset of the disease (p = 0.004).”
- Sagar’s/ lowell & winter also quotes reduced abduction as being poor prognostic factor
- All are true about reasons to operate for coxa vara except?
- HE angle > 60°
- Trendelenberg gait
- pain
- neck shaft of 110o
ANSWER: D
2011
Lovell and Winter:
Indications:
- Symptomatic limp, Trendelenburg gait or progressive deformity
- HE Angle > 60o
- Progressive decrease in neck-shaft angle to 90-100o