Arthroplasty (2008-2019) Flashcards
- When standing on one leg, what is the hip joint reaction force?
- 2.5
- 4.5
- 6.5
- 8.5
ANSWER: A (previously has been debated A vs B)
2012, 2013
- Journal of Biomechanics (2001) - Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities
- The average peak forces of the patients during normal walking at about 4km/h were between 211and 285% bodyweight.
- Sagars, millers, orthobullets says 4 BW for single leg stance
2.When are you more likely to injure the superior gluteal nerve?
- Glut med split with Hardinge approach
- Retractor placement with Kocher Langenbach
- When doing a GT osteotomy
ANSWER: A
2012
- What is the most common nerve injury associated with the Hardinge approach for a THA?
a. Sciatic
b. Inferior gluteal
c. Superior gluteal
d. Femoral
ANSWER: C
2015
- Picado CH (CORR 2007) Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after direct lateral approach to the hip
- The most common nerve injured during THA is:
- Sciatic (peroneal division)
- Obturator
- Superior Gluteal Nerve
- Femoral Nerve
ANSWER: A
2013
JAAOS 1999 - Nerve Injuries in THA
- Abitbol JJ (J Arthroplasty 1990) Gluteal nerve damage following THA
- Subclinical gluteal nerve injury documented in over 77% of patients
- Sciatic nerve in THA. All of the following except:
- Most completely recover
- 70% have subclinical EMG changes
- more common in females
- more common in revisions
ANSWER: A
2009
Farrell CM (JBJS 2005) Motor nerve palsy following primary THA
- Risk factors for nerve palsy –> DDH, post-traumatic arthritis, posterior approach, lengthening of extremity, cementless fixation
- Only 36% had complete recovery at 21 months
- 7/18 patients with incomplete palsy fully recovered their strength
JAAOS 1999 - Nerve Injuries in THA
- 70% of THA had subclinical sciatic nerve injury
- Mentions women as potential risk
- Isolated peroneal division did well, but very poor recovery if both tibial and peroneal divisions involved
- More frequent in DDH and revision scenario
- When putting in screws into the acetabulum and going into the safe posterosuperior zone, what is at risk?
- Obturator NV bundle
- External iliac
- Superior gluteal
- Inferior gluteal
ANSWER: C
- In order to determine the acetabular safe zone for screw placement, a line is drawn from where to where?
- AIIS to center of acetabulum
- ASIS to center of acetabulum
- Ischial tuberosity to center of acetabulum
- Cannot remember the last option
ANSWER - B
2014
- Wasielewski RC (JBJS 1990) Acetabular anatomy and the transacetabular fixation of screws in total hip arthroplasty.
- The quadrants are formed by drawing a line from the anterior superior iliac spine through the center of the acetabulum to the posterior fovea, forming acetabular halves. A second line is then drawn perpendicular to the first at the mid-point of the acetabulum, forming four quadrants. The posterior superior and posterior inferior acetabular quadrants contain the best available bone stock and are relatively safe for the transacetabular placement of screws. The anterior superior and anterior inferior quadrants should be avoided whenever possible, because screws placed improperly in these quadrants may endanger the external iliac artery and vein, as well as the obturator nerve, artery, and vein. The acetabular-quadrant system provides the surgeon with a simple intraoperative guide to the safe transacetabular placement of screws during primary and revision acetabular arthroplasty.
- 3rd generation cement technique does not include which of the following
- Vacuum mixing PMMA
- Pressurized
- Use of a cement plug
- Retrograde filling
ANSWER: C/D
2013
- Confusing – other version said pressurized mixing which is wrong
- Cement plug and retrograde (cement gun) filling were introduced in the 2nd generation but still part of 3rd generation.
- AAOS Comprehensive Review States:
- First-generation femoral cement techniques: cement mixed by hand in an open bowl; cement placed in canal by hand; no canal lavage or drying; pressure provided by surgeon’s thumb
- Second-generation techniques: plug, injecting doughy cement, using a cement gun
- Third-generation techniques: porosity reduction with vacuum, pressurization, pulsatile lavage
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3880950/#bib23 Bone Cement – J Clin Orthop Trauma 2013 – doi 10.1016/j.jcot.2013.11.005
Orthobullets: Technique
cementing techniques have evolved with time
1st generation
- hand-mixed cement
- finger packed cement
- no canal preparation or cement restrictor
2nd generation
- cement restrictor placement
- cement gun
- femoral canal preparation
- brush and dry
3rd generation
- vacuum-mixing to reduce cement porosity
- cement pressurization
- femoral canal preparation
- pulsatile lavage
*** 4th generation is an even cement mantle using centralizers for the stem
The well cemented THA p 150-154 Heisel 2005
- When pre-op planning for a THA, the femoral mechanical axis is?
- A line drawn through the centre of the femoral head to 1.5 cm medial to center of knee
- A line drawn through the centre of the femoral head to 1.5 cm lateral to center of knee
- A line drawn through the centre of the femoral head and intersecting the anatomic axis at the intercondylar notch
- A line bisecting the medullary canal
ANSWER: C
2014
- C correctly describes the mechanical axis of the femur, some argument for D in planning of a THA specifically
- What is a disadvantage of HXPE vs UHMWPE:
- Decreased fracture
- Decreased oxidization
- Increased cost
- Decreased wear
ANSWER: C
2015
- Thomas GE (JBJS 2011) The seven-year wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial using radiosterometric analysis
- XHPE has significantly lower steady-state wear than conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene
- Sakellariou V (HSS J 2013) Highly cross-linked polyethylene may not have an advantage in TKA
- We concluded that:
- the material properties of XLPE reduce adhesive and abrasive wear, but not the risk of crack propagation, deformation, pitting, and delamination found in TKR
- wear-induced osteolysis in TKR has not been found to be a major cause of failure at long-term follow-up
- mid-term follow-up studies show no difference in any recorded outcome measure between conventional PE and XLPE
- XLPE is two to four times the cost of conventional PE without an improvement in clinical or radiographic outcomes.
- Bhandari - Evidence Based Orthopedics
- Short duration follow up
- Improvement in wear with HXPE
- Mechanical properties of HCLPE are negatively affected by crosslinking
- Regarding the mechanical axis in the tibia, all are true except?
- Colinear and parallel in coronal plane
- Colinear and parallel in sagittal plane
- Mechanical and anatomical tibia axes are colinear
- LE axis passes 8 mm medial to tibial spines
ANSWER: D
2008
- 8mm is way to medial – variable but wither centre or slight medial
- Orthobullets: MAT (mech axis of tibia) is from central prox tibia to central talus, same as AAT (anatomic axis of tibia)
- Cherian et al. 2014: The position of the mechanical axis causes it to usually pass just medial to the tibial spine, but this can vary widely based on the patient height and pelvic width (increased pelvic width as in females and decreased height results in increased axis deviation
- What can be expected following trochanteric advancement which creates relative neck lengthening?
- Abductor weakness
- Reduces trendelenberg gait
- Will cause a limp
- Increased joint reaction forces
ANSWER: B
2016
- Usually aim to distalize and lateralize to improve abductor moment arm
- Aim is to tension abductors, increase stability (in THA) or improve function/ decrease tredelenburg
- Yes, it increases compressive forces (see millers pic) in general = increased instability
- But technically increases offset (lateralize), increase abductor moment arm, abductor efficiency and decrease JRF
- Metal on poly total hip. What is the most common cause of wear?
- Mode 1
- Mode 2
- Mode 3
- Mode 4
ANSWER: A
2011
JBJS 1999 - Current Concepts Review: Wear in Total Hip and Knee Replacements
- Mode 1 - motion between one primary bearing surface and another (head on liner)
- Mode 2 - primary bearing surface articulates with non-bearing surface (Head on shell)
- Mode 3 - entrapped abrasive particles between bearings
- Mode 4 - motion at secondary surfaces (impingement/fretting/backside wear)
- Stability of THA reduced by?
- larger head
- smaller head
- troch bursitis secondary to altered soft tissue tension
- position of cup at 40 degrees inclination and 15 degrees anteversion
ANSWER: B
2011
- decreased jump distance
- Which articulation has the least wear?
- large head metal on metal
- small head metal on metal
- head on crosslinked poly
- ceramic on ceramic
ANSWER: D
2011, 2012
- All of these are properties of PMMA except?
- exothermic to 75 degrees
- stronger in tension than compression
- does not have adhesive properties to implant
- Porosity reduction increases strength by 10-15%
ANSWER: B
2011
- Miller’s Orthopedics:
- Acts as a grout, not an adhesive
- Poor tensile and shear strength, strongest in compression
- Reducing porosity increases cement strength and decreases cracking
- What increases the incidence of cobalt chromium ions with MoM hips?
- Cup in 55o abduction
- Increase in head size
ANSWER: A
2013
- Regarding the benefits of tantalum in THA components. All are true except:
- More biocompatible than other metals
- More ingrowth in pores compared to other porous coated metals
- Greater friction at bone-metal interface
- Young’s modulus of tantalum more closely approximates bone than that of titanium
ANSWER: A
2008
All metal has excellent biocompatibility
JAAOS 2006 - Applications of Porous Tantalum in THA
- High volumetric porosity (70-80%), low modulus of elasticity, high frictional characteristics
- Excellent biocompatibility
- Modulus of elasticity similar to that of subchondral bone, but ultimate and yield strength much stronger
- 6 causes for groin pain and decreased function in a THA (2012)
Duffy PJ (JBJS 2005) Evaluation of patients with pain following total hip replacement
- Infection
- Aseptic loosening of acetabular component/Pelvic osteolysis
- Psoas tendonitis
- Dislocation/instability
- Synovitis secondary to wear debris
- Periprosthetic fracture
- Pseudotumor
- Heterotopic ossification
- Hernia
- Stress fracture of pelvis
- Lumbar spine disease
- GU/Gyne/Abdo
- List 4 advantages of using a high offset femoral stem. (2013, 2015)
JBJS 2004 - The role of femoral offset restoration
- Improved ROM
- Increased stability
- Decreased impingement of GT on pelvis
- Improved joint reactive forces - decreased wear/loosening
- Increased abductor strength/decreased limping
- What are 5 potential complications from a mal-positioned acetabular component? (2011, 2013, 2014)
- JAAOS 2010 - Improving the Accuracy of Acetabular Component Orientation
- Instability/Dislocation
- Impingement
- Aseptic Loosening
- Bearing surface wear/pelvic osteolysis
- Revision Surgery
- Psoas Irritation
- Leg Length Discrepancy
- X-ray of a hip with cystic changes and sclerosis (AVN). Give 3 common causes for this disease process. (2010, 2014)
AAOS Core Review:
- Trauma
- Steroids
- Alcohol
- SLE
- Renal Failure
- Organ Transplant
- Irradiation
- Hematologic Disorder (sickle cell, hypofibrinolysis, thrombophilia)
- Cytotoxins
- Dysbarism
- Storage Diseases (Gaucher’s)
- X-ray with a Crowe 4 hip - The patient is ready to undergo a THA. List 4 things that you have to consider from a technical aspect with regards to the procedure. (2010)
- Femoral Side:
- Increased anteversion
- Small diameter canal (ML smaller than AP)
- Increased anterior bow of femur
- Valgus neck shaft angle
- Small head, posterior GT
- Acetabulum:
- Increased anteversion
- Deficient anterosuperiorly
- Difficulty identifying true acetabulum
- Deficient bone stock
- Soft Tissues:
- Tensioning of sciatic nerve by leg lengthening (3cm or 10%*)
- Contracted, deficient abductors
- List 4 relative contraindications to total joint arthroplasty. (2011)
- Active or remote infection
- Presence of well-functioning, painless arthrodesis
- Neuromuscular disease causing potential instability
- Medically unfit
- Non-ambulatory patients/lack of active muscle power
- Active Charcot Neuroarthropathy
- Asymptomatic Arthritis
- Insufficient soft tissues
- Patient with a 15 year old THA. Suffers peri-prosthetic fracture. List 3 factors that are important when deciding on treatment. (2010, 2014)
Vancouver Classification
- Location of fractures
- Implant Stability
- Bone Stock
- 70 yr old with cemented 15 yr THA, 1 yr history of thigh pain and periprosthetic fracture. List 3 factors important in the surgical management. (2010)
Vancouver Classification:
- Location of fracture
- Stability of implant
- Bone stock available
Other:
- Pre-operative medical optimization/function
- Rule out infection (ESR, CRP)
- Abductor deficiency (constraint)
- Acetabular component stability (dual revision)
- Previous components
- All are risk factors for Osteonecrosis of femoral head except
- Corticosteroid use
- Caissons disease
- Trauma
- Hemophilia A
ANSWER: D
2013
JAAOS 2004/2014
- Pathogenic Mechanisms for Osteonecrosis
- Ischemia –> femoral neck fracture, dislocation, surgery
- Vascular compression
- Corticosteroids
- Alcohol
- Thrombosis/thrombophilias
- Embolization with fat or air
- Sickle cell occlusion
- Cellular toxicity –> drugs, radiation, oxidative stress
- 70 yo with cemented (cup and stem) THA 15 years ago presents with worsening activity-related pain gradually over 2 year period. No constitutional symptoms, otherwise healthy. ESR and CRP are normal. X-ray shows loose acetabular component only. What further workup is indicated before proceeding to revision THR?
- Bone scan
- WBC Scan
- Aspiration and nuclear med
- Nothing
ANSWER: D
2012
Spangehl (JBJS 1999)
- If both CRP and ESR are normal then negative predictive value for infection is 100%
- Could argue bone scan to assess for loosening of femoral component, but I agree this question is likely getting at ruling out infection
- Doesn’t matter because you are already doing a revision so you can test it which is more definitive
- What can be done to increase the primary arc of motion in a total hip arthroplasty?
- Use a larger head
- Placing a collar on the femoral neck
- Increasing the offset
- Increasing the acetabular anteversion
ANSWER: A
2014
Miller’s Review - pg 377 THA Joint Instability
- Primary Arc Range is controlled by the head/neck ratio:
- Best stability is achieved by maximizing head/neck ratio
- Things that decrease arc range:
- Neck skirt (femoral head collar)
- Acetabular hood
- Constrained cups
- Which situation is best for a constrained acetabular liner in a recurrently unstable THA?
- well-positioned cup with GT nonunion
- well-positioned cup with absent GT
- mal-positioned cup with absent GT
- mal-positioned cup with GT non-union
ANSWER - B
2014
JAAOS Dislocation after THA
“the ideal candidate for a constrained device is a low-demand patient who lacks inherent soft-tissue constraint and has either a well-fixed cup suitable for a constrained liner or adequate bone stock for maximal screw fixation of a constrained cup”
- What is true regarding modular neck in THA prosthesis:
- Decreased notching due to increased varus in the component
- Increased corrosion
- Increased osteolysis
- Increased soft tissue reaction
ANSWER: B
2015
JBJS 2014 - early corrosion-related failure of the rejuvenate modular total hip replacement
JAAOS 2016 - Corrosion of the Head-neck Junction after Total Hip Arthroplasty
- What is the most common reason for revision in THA?
- Instability
- Infection
- Pain
- LLD
ANSWER: A
2015, 2016
Aseptic Loosening MOST COMMON NOW
JBJS 2009 – The Epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States
- 56 yo male with THA complains of groin pain. Pain with circumduction and resisted flexion on exam. XRAY shows abducted cup - what do you do?
a. Physio
b. WBC scan
c. Acetabular cup revision +/- psoas release
d. Revision of acetabular and femoral components
ANSWER: C
2015
- Dora C (JBJS Br 2007) Iliopsoas impingement after THA: The results of non-operative management, tenotomy or acetabular revision
- Review of 30 hips with well-fixed but mal-positioned or over-sized cups and iliopsoas tendonitis
- 86% of patients with surgery had improvement
- Conservative management failed in all cases
- No benefit between tenotomy and acetabular revision at 2 years, revision had higher initial complications
- JAAOS 2009 - Anterior Iliopsoas Impingement and Tendinitis after THA
- Non-surgical treatment successful in only 39% of cases in our literature review
- What is the most predictable treatment of a femoral head with AVN of femoral head that already shows collapse?
- arthroplasty
- core decompression
- fibular allograft
- bisphosphates
ANSWER: A
2011
- Chiari Osteotomy now needs a THA, what is the challenge of THA?
- Move GT distally
- Move GT laterally
- Acetabular exposure
- Over reaming of anterior and posterior walls
ANSWER: C
2008
Looked for a relevant paper and didn’t get anything
- Least likely to have HO after THA
- Pagets
- Females under 65
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Cementless Implants
ANSWER: B
2008
JAAOS HO After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
- Risk factors:
- high risk
- men with bilateral hypertrophic oA
- history of HO in either hip
- post-traumatic arthritis characterized by hypertrophic osteophytosis
- moderate
- ankylosing spondylitis
- DISH
- Paget’s
- Unilateral hypertrophic OA
- Men > women
- Cementless femoral component
- Approach: extended iliofemoral > Kocher > ilioinguinal
- HO and TKA, risk factors - all of the following except
- Femur Notching
- RA
- Manipulation post-op
- Female with hypertrophic osteoarthropathy
ANSWER: B
2008
JAAOS
Patients at high risk for developing HO after TKA include those with limited post-op knee flexion, increased lumbar BMD, hypertrophic arthrosis, excessive periosteal trauma, notching of the anterior femur, those who require forced manipulation after TKA
- THA and hemophilia, all of the following except:
- Replace factors to 100%
- Coxa valga
- Infection rate similar to non-hemophiliac patients
- HO rate is decreased
ANSWER: C
2008
JAAOS 2005 - Hemophiliac Arthropathy
- Clotting Replacement
- Two hours pre-op –> infusion to 100%
- Maintain >60% throughout procedure and maintain until discharge
- With juvenile onset of synovitis and secondary inhibition of abductor function, coxa valga is the usual pattern
- “There appears to be no increased incidence of heterotopic ossification after hip replacement”
- Incidence of late infection in prosthetic joints averages 10%
- High prevalence of HIV
- THA and Sickle Cell anemia - all of the following except:
- Must cover for salmonella
- Increased dislocation rate
- Increased early revision
- Increased deep infection
ANSWER: A
2008
JAAOS 2005 - THA in Sickle Cell Anemia
- Infection rate 16-20%
- No cases of Salmonella infection of THA
- Dislocation rates up to 25%