parole and sentencign Flashcards
Sentence
The judicial determination of a legal sanction upon a person
convicted of an offence
Specific deterrence
reducing probability that an offender will reoffend in the
future
General deterrence
reducing probability that members of the general public will
offend in the future
Why do we sentence offenders?
change behavior → convicted and potential
The Purpose of Sentencing
Judges will have different sentencing
goals depending on the case:
◦ Can meet multiple goals at once
◦ Sometimes goals can be incompatible with
one another
◦ Judges will choose different sentences for
different reasons → sentencing disparity
The Principles of Sentencing
Sentence should be adjusted based on aggravating or mitigating circumstances
relating to the offense or the offender
◦ Sentences should be similar for similar offenders and similar offenses
◦ If reasonable, sanctions other than imprisonment should be considered for all
offenders
Fundamental Principle of Sentencing
sentence must be proportionate to the gravity of the offence and the degree of responsibility of the offender
Explicitly stated in the Criminal Code of Canada
In all, sentencing is light
Maxwell (2015) → probation is the most
common type of sentence (40%)
◦ When imprisonment was ruled, quite short
◦ Median 30 days
Some argue that variation in sentences are
more due to the judge than factors such as
seriousness, previous sentences,
responsibility, etc.
Men receive 63% longer sentences than
women
Conditional Sentence
prison
sentence served in the
community
Imprisonment
a sentence
served in prison
Reparations or Restitution
a
sentence in which the offender
has to make monetary payment
to the victim or community
Sentencing Disparity
Variations in sentencing severity for similar crimes committed under similar
circumstances
Unwarranted sentencing disparity
when judge relies on legally irrelevant
factors
Two sources of unwarrednred sentcing disparity
Systematic disparity: consistent disagreement among judges
◦ Due to factors such as how lenient to be
Unsystematic disparity: inconsistencies in a judge’s sentencing decisions over time when judging the same type ofoffender
◦ Due to factors such as judge’s mood
Palys & Divorski (1986)
206 Canadian provincial court judges examined 5 criminal cases findings
judges are soooo different