intro to forensic psych Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

the first forensic psych study

A

james cattell, recollection being inaccurate, no correlation between accuracy and confidence

  • eye witness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

second forensic psych study

A

suggestability, memorizing objects, memory and recall

free recall is better than asking questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

memory more or less accurate when direct/leading vs recall

A

less acurate be suggesatbility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

forensic psychology definition

A

field of psych that deals w all aspects of human behaviour as it relates to the law or legal system

  • thinking patterns, emotions, risk factors, interview w criminal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

narrow definition- forensic psych

A

clinical psych as it pertains to the legal system

assessing, treatments, consulting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

broad definiton - forensic psych

A

research endeavor that examines human behaviour directly related to the legal process

clinical work within the legal system

ex. divorce - who gets the children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

clinical forensic psychologist

A

assessment, treatment of mental issues as they pertain to the law or legal system

does an offender pose a risk to community?

who is best suitded for a job in policing? (interview candidtates)

Is this law enforcement officer ready to go back to work after a stressful vent

hospital, prison

can work privaelty, consult w lawyers, victims, perpretratirs

get them ready to go back into the real work from prison - less structure - are they ready - do they need a halfway house

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

experimental forensic psychologist

A

might never be in contect w lawyers or crimincals

memory, suggestibility, human behviour, info processing, stress’ influence

what factors influence a jury?

how can we effectivelt conduct eyewitness line ups?

what kind of biass exist amonf lae enfocment officers?

legal scholars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

legal scholars

A

someones who condictd resarch and has a law degre

not common bc need a lot of school

has phD in psych

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

psychology AND the law

A

using psych to study the operation of the legal system

testing assumptions “are eyewitnesses accurate”

are juries fair?

do judges have biases?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

psychology IN the law

A

psychological knowledge

dont need to be a psychologist to know this

using psych within the legal system as it currently operates

ex. providing testimony in court

relayed info from a psychologist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

psychology OF the law

A

use of psychology to study the law itself

ex. does the law reduce the occurance of a crime

  • hard to explain legal rights to a child
  • when should eye witness testimony be thrown out (too young, too stressed)
  • therapist has to report when client has intent to harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

witness

A

can testify abour what they directly observed

fact witness

info abt the criminal or victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

expert witness

A

provide court w their personal opinion on matters relevant to the case

an educator to the judge/ jury

needs special training

have to be reliable and helpful

NOT an advocate
ALWAYS objective

typically will be a clinical psychologist w years of training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

is a forensic psychologist always an expert witness

A

no but a clinical one would be more likely than an experimental one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

americas first expert witness

A

state v driver

psychologist w expertise in juvinile delinquency

victim was found to have a mental disorder

17
Q

expert witnesses need to know…..

A

details of the case and their own testimny

their role in proceedings

how to commimocate in a persaucive and helpful manner - prove the truth is right

18
Q

why is being an expert witness hard

A

bc theres a dif between psych truth and legal truth

19
Q

epistemology psych vs law

A

law=subjective

psych =objective

20
Q

Goals psych vs law

A

law= says how to behave and how to punish

psych= says why ppl behave the way they do

21
Q

knowledge law vs psych

A

law- idiographic analysis, rational application of logic, case by case, common sense, rely on previoius cases to set a precedence

psych - based on empricial group based data, science to back claims, research methods, group focused not individual focuses, knowledge from pop

22
Q

methods law vs psych

A

law - constructing compelling narriativies that are consistent w the law (lawyer says they did x but x falls in the bounds of the law)

psych - empirical, want to replicate results, control for confounfd, scientific method

23
Q

criterion law vs psych

A

law - guilt is determined using several criteria, beyond reasonable doubt, not very conservative

psych - cautious to accept something is true (p<0.5)

24
Q

principals psych vs law

A

law - tries to make one explnation the best reason for the events (only 1 truth)

psych - exploratory approach, consiers multiple explanantionz (all thinfs related)

25
Q

court behv law vs psych

A

law - fewver restrictiond on lawyers - can call on many witness

pscyh - only one role if any and tyhey hv no power abt the case, many cases donr use psych expert witness

26
Q

general acceptance test

A

expert testimony will be admissible in court if the basis of the testimony is generally accepted within the relevant scientitic community

27
Q

two criticism of general acceptance test

A

vagueness in terms of gernal acceptance

whether trial judges can make this determinatyion

28
Q

bendectin general acceptance

A

even tho the drug was bad it was widely used therefor widely accetpted

moved to the daubert

29
Q

daubert crieria came from the US supreme court

A
  1. research has been peer reviweed
  2. reseatch is testable/ falsifiable
  3. research has recognized rate of error
  4. reseacrch adgerenes to professional standards
30
Q

mohan criteria - used in canada

A
  1. must be relevant it the case - states that a fact is more or less liekly
  2. must be necessary to assist the trier of fact beyond common undertsandinf of the court
  3. must not violate any rules of exclusion not being predujucual
  4. must be profvided by a qualified expert

experts must be independent and impartial