paper 1 -2022 Flashcards
define obedience
a form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order.
the person issuing the order is usually a figure of authority, who had the power to punish when obedient behavior is not forthcoming
what did Milgram aim to study
obedience
to understand why such a high population obeyed hitler
Milgrams baseline procedures
40 American men - volunteer sample -though they were randomly given a role
pair with a confederates who acted as the learner within the experiment
instructed by an experimenter (grey lab coat) - shock learner when they answer wrong
volts increased after each shock - 15volts to 450 volts
told the confederate had heart condition before beginning
confederate never shocked
what % did Milgram psychology student predict would go to 450volts
3% - 450volts
14 psychology students
what % of participants ended up going to 450volts
12.5% - 300volts (5 participants)
65% - 450 volts
what type of findings did Milgram find
65% - 450volts
qualitative date - interview + observation
observation = signs of extreme tension, sweating, biting lip, groaning (3 seizures)
interviews = 84% said they were glad they participated
what did Milgram conclude
German people in ww2 - weren’t different
a strength of Milgram’s study - research support
replicated in French documentary - made about reality tv
participants believed that were on a game show’s pilot episode
paid to give fake shocks to other participants who were actors
80% went to max shock of 450volts to an “unconscious” man
behavior identical to Milgram’s participants - sweating nail biting
therefore result are not due to special circumstances
weakness - Milgram - low internal validity
may not test what was intended
75% participants believed shocks were real (Milgram stated)
psychologists argue that participants believe they behaved that way as they were play acting
when listening to Milgram’s tapes - only half believed it was real and 2/3 of participants were disobedient
therefore participants were responding to demand characteristics
counterpoint to low internal validity - Milgram evaluation
a study conducted like Milgram’s - but puppies were shocked instead
gave real shocks
54% of male students 100% female students delivered the shock - when they though it was fatal
this suggests that Milgram’s finding are correct as people behave the same way when shocks are real
weakness - Milgram - ethical implications
deception - lied about it being a real shock, participant was a confederate, heart condition
participant harm - 3 seizures and clear signs of distress
social sensitivity
define situational variables
features of the immediate physical and social environment which may influence a person’s behavior.
what situational variables did Milgram study
proximity
uniform
location
why did Milgram study situational variables
to see if they led to more or less obedience
situational variable - proximity results
teacher and learner in the same room = obedience dropped form 65% to 40%
touch proximity - move their hand onto the electric plate = dropped to 30%
remote instruction variation - experimenter in another room, instructed through telephone
= obedience dropped to 20.5% and participants pretended to give shocks
situational variable - proximity explanation
decreased proximity allows people to psychologically distance themselves from the consequences of their actions.
e.g. less aware of the harm they course the learner when they were separated
situational variable - location findings
obedience dropped to 47.5% from 65%
when the experiment was conducted in a rundown office building instead of at Yale university
situational variable - location explanation
prestigious university gave legitimacy and authority to Milgram’s study
so more likely to obey in this location as they saw the experimenter as sharing this legitimate and thought obedience was expected
however obedience in the office was still high in the office block because of the perceived scientific nature of the procedure
situational variable - uniform findings
baseline = experimenters wore a grey lab coat as a symbol of authority
experimenter called away because of an inconvenient telephone call at the start of the experiment - replaces with an ordinary member of the public (confederate in normal clothes)
obedience dropped to the lowest rate of 20%
situational variable - uniform explanation
uniforms encourage obedience - widely recognized as symbols of authority
we accept that someone in an uniform is entitled to obedience as their authority is legitimate
someone without an uniform is less right to expect our obedience
strength of situational variables - research support
other studies have demonstrated the influence of situational variable on obedience.
field experiment in NYC - had 3 confederate dress up 1 milkman 1 in suit and 1 security guard
all 3 confederates stood in street and ask individual to pick up litter/ put a coin in parking meters.
people x2 likely to help the security guard than the one in the suit
therefore support situational variables, such as uniform, effect obedience
strength of situational explanation - cross-cultural replications
other psychologists create a more realistic version of Milgram’s experiment on Dutch participants. - participant ordered to say stressful things to (confederate) someone desperate for a job.
90% of participants obeyed and also replicated Milgram’s findings concerning proximity. - obedience decreased when the person giving instructions wasn’t present
this suggest that the findings are not limited to American males, but is valid across cultures and genders
limitation of situational variables - low internal validity
participants may have been aware that the procedures were fake.
psychologists have criticized Milgram’s baseline procedures - but suggest that it is even more likely in the variables because of the extra manipulation of variables e.g. when a member of the public replaced the experimenter.
and even Milgram recognized that this situation is so contrived that some participants may have worked out the truth.
therefore in all of Milgram’s studies it is unclear if the findings are because of obedience or demand characteristics and play acting
define agentic state
a mental state where we feel no personal responsibility for our behavior because we believe ourselves to be acting for an authority figure. this frees us from the demands of our conscience and allows us to obey even a destructive authority figure.
what is an agent
is someone who acts for or in place of another.
experience high levels of anxiety / moral strain when they realize what they are doing is wrong
feel powerless to disobey
what is the autonomous state
is a state when an individual is independent or free
behave according to their own principles and feel a sense of responsibility their own actions
what is the agentic shift
the shift from autonomy to agency
when an authority figure has greater power or higher position in the social hierarchy instructs them - course shift
what are binding factors and how do they effect the agentic shift
Milgram observed how participant want to stop but didn’t, so suggested binding factors.
an aspect of a situation that allows the individual to ignore the damaging effects of their behavior and reduce moral strain .
for example, shift the responsibility onto the victim or deny the damage coursed to the victim
strength of agentic state theory - research support
studies support that the agentic state has a role in obedience
most of Milgram’s participants resisted giving shocks at some point but asked questions to the experimenter about the procedures
p=”who is responsible if he is hurt” E= “I’m responsible”
after participants often went through the procedure quickly with no further objections.
this shows that once the participant is no longer responsible for their actions they acted more easily as the experimenter agent, as Milgram suggests
weakness of the agentic state - limited explanation
the agentic state doesn’t explain many research findings about obedience
for example, one study found that 16 out of 18 nurses disobeyed orders from a doctor when told to administer an excessive drug dose to a patient.
the doctor was an authority figure but all nurses stayed in an autonomous state.
therefore the agentic shift can only account for certain situations of obedience.
define legitimacy of authority
an explanation for obedience which suggests that we are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have authority over us.
this authority justified by the individual’s position of power within a social hierarchy.
legitimacy of authority
society is structure with a social hierarchy- so people in certain position hold authority over us.
authority weighs legitimacy as it is agreed upon within society.
accepted that authority figures are allowed to excessive power over other as it allow society to run smoothly.
what is a consequence of legitimacy of authority
some people are granted the power to punish others
this can led to destructive authority
what is a destructive authority
a powerful leader that uses their legitimate authority for destructive purposes, ordering people to behave in cruel and dangerous ways
e.g. hitler, stalin or pol pot
this type of leader is clear in Milgram’s experiment, as participant behavior went against their consciences
strength of legitimacy of authority - explains cultural differences
many studies have shown that different countries differ in the degree to which people obey authority. - Milgram-style studies
16% of Australian participants went to 450volts
85% of German participants went to 450volts
this shows that in some cultures authority is more likely to be legitimate and entitled to demand obedience from individuals.
this also reflects how differ cultures raise children to perceive authority figures.
weakness of legitimacy of authority - cannot explain all disobedience
cannot explain disobedience within the hierarchy when authority is clear and accepted
rank and Jacobson’s -16/18 nurses refused to give a lethal dose to patients when instructed to do so by a doctor, a clear authority figure.
also a minority of Milgram’s participants (5) disobeyed despite recognizing the experiencers scientific authority.
this suggest that some people are less/ more likely to obey and it is possible that innate tendency may greater influence on behavior than legitimacy of authority.
define authoritarian personality
a type of personal that Adorno argues was especially susceptible to obeying people in authority . such individuals are also thought to be submissive to those of higher status and dismissive of inferiors
define dispositional explanation
any explanation of behavior that highlights the importance of the individual’s personality.
what dispositional explanation tries to explain obedience
authoritarian personality
who suggest the authoritarian personality explanation to obedience
Adorno et al
why did Adorno what to study obedience
to understand anti-Semitism
authoritarian personality characteristics
extreme respect for authority
view society as weaker than it was - so need strong leaders to enforce traditional values
likely to follow orders from an external source of authority
show contempt for weaker members of society
fueled by an inflexible view of the world - no grey area
origins of the authoritarian personality
forms in childhood as a result of harsh parenting
parenting style = strict disciplines, expectation of absolute loyalty, impossibly high standards and severe criticism of perceived failing.
conditional love - depends solely on how they behave
childhood experience of resentment and hostility that they cant express to parents due to a fear of punishment. - displace fear onto weaker people (scapegoating)
psychodynamic explanation
Adorno’s research - procedures
2000 - middle class white Americans participants
studied their unconscious attitudes to racial groups
developed serval measures scales - including the potential-for-fascism scale (F-scale)
example Q’s of the F-scale - obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues for children to learn.
Adorno’s research - findings
people with authoritarian leanings identified with strong people and were generally contemptuous of the weak ( scored high on the scale)
very conscious of status and showed extreme respect for people in high status
had a certain cognitive style - no crossovers between categories of people and distinctive stereotypes about other groups
found a positive correlation between authoritarian personality and prejudice
strength of the authoritarian personality - research support
elms and Milgram
interviewed a small sample of people who had participated in the ordinal obedience studies who had been fully obedient - completed the f-scale
these 20 participants scored significantly high on the overall f-scale than a comparative 20 disobedient group of participants
2 groups clearly different in terms of authoritarianism
support Adorno’s view that obedient people have very similar characteristics to people with authoritarian personalities
counterpoint to research support - Adorno’s research
researchers analyzed the individual subscales of the f-scale
found that the obedient participants had a number of characteristics that were unusual for authoritarians
e.g. didn’t usually glorify their fathers, didn’t experience high levels of punishment in childhood and didn’t have hostile emotions towards their mothers
this means that the link between obedience and authoritarianism is complex. - participants not authoritarian - unlikely to be a useful predictor of obedience
weakness of the authoritarian personality - limited explanation
authoritarianism cannot explain obedience behavior in the majority of a country’s population.
e.g. prewar Germany million of people showed obedience to racist and anti-Semitic
despite them all having different personalities
seems unlikely that they could all possess an authoritarian personality
an alternative view is that they could identified with the anti-Semitic Nazi state and scapegoated the outgroup of Jews, a social identity theory approach
therefore limited and alternative explanation is much more realistic
define resistance to social influence
refers to the ability of people to withstand the social pressure to conform to the majority or to obey authority.
this ability to withstand social pressure is influenced by both situational and dispositional factors
define social support
the presence of people who resist pressures to conform or obey can help others to do the same.
these people act as models to show others that resistance to social influence is possible
define locus of control
refers to the sense we each have about what directs events in our lives.
social support - resistance to conformity
pressure to conform can be resisted if there people present not conforming.
Asch - confederate not conforming
this person provides social support enabling the naïve participant to follow their own consciousness
confederate - acts as a model of independent behavior
there dissent leds to more - as shows the majority is not longer unanimous
social support - resisting obedience
pressure to obey can be resisted if another person disobeys
Milgram - 65% to 10% when there was a disobedient confederate
don’t follow the disobedient behavior but the disobedient person acts as a model of dissent to copy and this allows him to act on his consciousness
disobedient model challenges the legitimacy of the authority - make it easy for more to disobey
strength of social support - real world research support
research support for the positive effect of social support
teen fresh start USA - an 8 week program to help pregnant adolescents (14-19) resist the pressure to smoke
social support provided through a buddy/mentor
at the end of the study those with a buddy were significantly less likely to smoke than the control group without a buddy
this show that social support can help young people resist social influence as part of an intervention in the real world
strength of social support - research support for dissenting peers
evidence support the role of dissenting peers in resisting obedience
Gamson et al - participants tole to produce evidence that would be used to help an oil company run a smear campaign.
found higher levels of resistance than in Milgram’s study -88% rebelled against their orders
this could be because participants were in a group so could discuss
this shows that peer support can led to disobedience by undermining the legitimacy of an authority figure.
locus of control
internal control vs external control.
psychologist = Rotter et al
locus of control continuum
people are not just either external or internal
LOC is scale and people vary where they are positioned on it
high internal LOC one end and high external LOC on the other
resistance to social influence - LOC
people with high internal LOC are more able pressure to conform and obey.
take responsibility for there actions and experiences - also tend base their decision on their own beliefs
another explanation - people with high internal LOC are more self confidence, more achievement orientated and have higher intelligence
these trait led to greater resistance to social influence
theses are also traits of leaders who need much less social approval.
strength of LOC - research support
research evidence to support the link between LOC and resistance to obedience
Holland - repeated Milgram’s baseline study and measures if participants had internal or external LOC.
found = 37% of internal didn’t continue to 450 volts whereas only 23% of externals didn’t.
this shows that internal have a greater resistance to authority in this situation.
therefore, resistance is partly linked to LOC and increases the validity of LOC as an explanation.
Weakness of LOC - contradictory research
evidence that challenges the link between LOC and resistance.
analyzed data from American LOC studies conducted over 40 years period
the data showed that people came more resistant to obedience but also more external over this time period.
this show that resistance may not be linked to LOC as people should have become more internal.
this suggests that locus of control is not a valid explanation of how people resist social influence
define minority influence
a form of social influence in which a minority of people persuades others to adopt their beliefs, attitudes or behaviors. leads to internalization or conversion, in which private attitudes are changed as well as public behavior.
what are the 3 factors course minority influence
consistency
commitment
flexibility
consistency - minority influence
when the minority keeps the same believe both over time and between all the individuals that form the minority.
is effective as it draws attention to the minority view.
synchronic consistency = between people
diachronic consistency = overtime
start to make people rethink their own beliefs
commitment - minority influence
minority demonstrates dedication to their position by making personal sacrifices
this is effective as it show the minority is not acting out of self-interest
augmentation principle = majority members pay more attention because of the risks they take
flexibility - minority influence
relentless consistency counter-productive as it can be seen as unreasonable and unbending. therefore minority influence is more effective if they show flexibility through the possibility of compromise.
key is to strict balance between consistency and flexibility by changing when presented with a valid counterargument
explaining the process of change - minority influence
3 factors led to people thinking about the minorities views or cause
hear something new = think deeply about especially with the 3 factors
deeper process which is important in the process conversion - converted when they switch to the minority view.
faster rate of conversion is the snowball effect. - leading the minority view slowly becoming the majority.
strength of minority influence - research evidence for consistency
research demonstrating the importance of consistency
Moscovici’s blue/green slide study - showed that a consistent minority had greater effect on changing views than an inconsistent option.
meta-analysis conducted of almost 100 similar studies and found that minority that were consistent were most influential
this suggests that presenting a consistent view is a minimum requirement for a minority trying to influence the majority.
strength of minority influence - research support for deeper processing
evidence showing that a change in the majority’s position does involve deeper processing of the minority’s ideas.
study = presented a message supporting a particular viewpoint and measured participants agreement.
one group heard minority agree and second heard a minority agree, then both exposed to a conflicting view and there agreement was measured again.
found people were less likely to change their view if they heard the minority groups view.
this suggests that the minority view had been deeper processed and had more enduring effects, supporting the view of the central argument about minority influence
short term memory - capacity, coding and duration
capacity = 7 +/- 2 coding = acoustically duration = around 18 seconds
long term memory - capacity, coding, duration
capacity = unlimited coding = semantically duration = up to a lifetime
define coding
the format in which information is stored in the various memory stores
define capacity
the amount of information that can be held in a memory store
define duration
the length of time information can be held in memory
multi store model diagram
stimulus from environment sensory resistor - store attention STM - store prolonged rehearsal (+response) LTM maintenance rehearsal (+ retrieval)
define the multi - store model of memory
a representation how memory works in terms of three stores called the sensory register, short term memory and long term memory.
it also describes how information is transferred from one store to another and what makes some memories disappear.
sensory register store
any stimulus in the environment passes information into the SR
comprised of the 5 senses making coding in this store modality - specific
coded = visual = iconic memory acoustically - echoic memory
capacity = very high
duration = less than half a second
short term memory store
once attention is given to something in the sensory resistor it is passed into the STM
coded = acoustically
duration = 18 seconds (unless rehearsed)
capacity = 7 +/- 2
information can be moved from LTM to STM store with retrieval
maintenance rehearsal
occurs when we repeat material to ourselves multiple times
by repeating it we can keep information in the short term memory or if repeated enough information is passed to LTM store
long-term memory
information moves to LTM store with prolonged rehearsal
coded = semantically
duration = up to a lifetime
capacity = unlimited
strength of MSM - research support
support from studies showing that the STM and LTM are different
e.g. Baddeley - mix up words that are acoustically similar when using our STM but mix up words that are semantically similar if using our LTM
this led to the conclusion that they are separate stores as they are encoded differently
further studies show that STM and LTM also have different capacity and duration
Therefore, studies also highlight that STM and LTM are separate stores
weakness of MSM - more than one STM store
evidence of more than one store for STM
psychologists studied a client referred as KF who had a clinical memory disorder called amnesia
they found KF’s STM for digits was very poor when they read them aloud to him but had much better recall when reading digits for himself.
further studies on KF found that there may even be a STM store for non-verbal sounds
therefore evidence suggest the MSM is incorrect when it states there is one STM store processing different types of information
weakness of MSM - elaborative rehearsal
prolonged rehearsal is not needed for transfer to LTM
MSM suggest that the more you rehearse something the more likely it is to transfer into the LTM.
however, studies have found that the type of rehearsal is more important than the amount.
Elaborate rehearsal is needed for LT storage - this occurs when we link new information to existing knowledge. this means that information can be transferred to LTM without prolonged rehearsal.
this means that the MSM doesn’t fully explain how long term storage is achieved
define episodic memory
a long term memory store for personal events. it includes memories of when the events occurred and of the people, objects, places and behavior involved. memories in this store have to be retrieved consciously and with effort
define sematic memory
a long term memory store for our knowledge of the world. This includes facts and our knowledge of what words and concepts mean. these memories usually also need to be recalled deliberately.
define procedural memory
a long term memory store for our knowledge of how to do things. this includes our memories of learned skills. we usually recall these memories without making a conscious or deliberate effort.
define working memory model
a representation of short term memory. it suggests that STM is a dynamic processor of different types of information using subunits coordinated by a central decision - making system
working memory model
Baddeley and Hitch
explanation of how STM is organized and how it functions
is concerned with that mental space is active when we are temporality storing and manipulating information
the model has 4 main components each qualitatively different - especially in terms of coding and capacity
central executive
supervisory role
focus and divided our limited attention
allocates slave systems to tasks
capacity = very limited and doesn’t store any information
phonological loop
1 of the slave systems - in charge of acoustic information
preserves the order in which the information arrives in
subdivided into the phonological store and articulatory process
phonological store
a component of the phonological store which acts as an inner ear by storing words you hear
articulatory process
allows maintenance rehearsal
by repeating words or sound in a loop to keep them in the working memory whilst they are needed
capacity of the loop is 2 seconds worth what you can say
visuo-spatail sketchpad
second slave system
stores visual and/ or spatial information when required
e.g. how many window are on your house - visualize it
capacity = Baddeley suggest 3 to 4 objects
Logie subdivided the VSS into visual cache and inner scribe
visual cache
stores visual information, such as the arrangement of objects
inner scribe
records the arrangement of objects in the visual field
episodic buffer
temporary stores information, integrating the visual spatial and verbal information processed by other stores and maintaining the sense of time sequencing
basically the record of events
storage component of the central executive and has a limited capacity of 4 chunks (Baddeley’s research)
links the WMM to LTM and other cognitive processes
strength of WMM - clinical evidence
support from a case studied conducted on patient KF who suffered from Amnesia.
after his brain injury - poor STM ability to store auditory information but could process visual information normally.
example - immediate recall of letter and digits he read himself was better than when other read them to him.
this suggest that KF’s phonological loop was damage but his visuo- spatial sketchpad was intact
support the existing of separate visual and acoustic memory stores
counterpoint to clinical evidence - WMM
unclear is KF had other cognitive impairments which might have affected his performance on memory.
for example, his injury was caused by a motorcycle accident, so the trauma may have effected the performance of other cognitive processes apart from brain injury.
this challenges evidence that comes from clinical studies of people with brain injuries that may have be affected many different systems
strength of WMM - Dual task performance
studies of dual- task performance support the separate existence of the visuo - spatial sketchpad
Baddeley = participants carried out visual and verbal tasks at the same time, their performance of both task was similar to when they carried them out separately
however when both task were visual or verbal the performance on both declined substantially.
this could be because both visual task was using the same slave subsystem whereas there was no competition when visual and verbal tasks where competed together
this shows there may be separate slave systems that processes visual input and one for verbal processes
Weakness of WMM - nature of the central executive
lack of clarity over the nature if the central executive
Baddeley - recognized this and stated that the central executive is the most important but least understood component of the WMM
CE needs to be more clearly specified than just being simply attention, for example some psychologist that it may have subcomponents
this means that the CE is an unsatisfactory component and this challenges the integrity of the WMM
define cognitive interview
a method of interviewing eyewitnesses to help them retrieve more accurate memories.
the cognitive interview - development / beginning
fisher and Geiselman argued that eyewitness testimony could be improved if the police used better techniques when interviewing
thus developed cognitive interviews
report everything
witnesses are encouraged to state every detail they remember of the event even if they see it as irrelevant or they don’t feel confident about it
gain trivial detail that may become important and help trigger over memories