P3 Physical fieldwork Flashcards
state the physical fieldwork enquiry
Does the River Wyre follow the Bradshaw model?
describe the aim of the physical fieldwork
- help us understand how rivers change as they flow downstream
- considers a wide range of characteristics
- able to draw a definitive yes or no conclusion to the question
describe why River Wyre was a suitable location for our human enquiry
- relatively nearby - easy/quick to get to
- easy access from road to river+ footpaths - safe
- in shallow upper course of the river - safe to enter the stream bed
- characteristics of a typical river - should follow Bradshaw model
describe the risk assessment for physical fieldwork (3)
- slippery rocks/ difficult ground: risk of injury -> wear footwear with good grip
- bad weather: wet/windy due to high altitude -> wear suitable clothing+ jacket
- nearby road: moving traffic -> walk in single file
evaluate effectiveness of drawing triangular bars (next to the Bradshaw model) as a presentation technique to show changes in characteristics P
- extremely effective
- summarises data collected into a simple diagram
- easy to interpret+ form a conclusion - shows the gradual change as you move downstream+ whether it increases/decreases
- easily compared to the bars in the Bradshaw model - provides a direct yes or no answer to the enquiry
state characteristics measured+ methods used in physical fieldwork (3)
- velocity - systematic sampling
- channel width+ depth - systematic sampling
- stone size+shape - random sampling
justify the data collection method used to find velocity P
- repeated 5 times to calculate an average - increases accuracy
- ignored anomalies when finding average - increases accuracy
- repeated if float got stuck - increases accuracy
- measured time taken+ distance travelled to calculate velocity
- calculated velocity at each site to see how velocity changed further downstream
describe the interpretation of velocity from method P
- velocity increases further downstream
- follows Bradshaw model
- due to decrease in obstructions in river channel (less large rocks) - rocks become smaller due to attrition+abrasion
- rocks downstream are eroded by abrasion+ attrition so become smooth - reduces friction+ water can flow over them more easily
evaluate effectiveness of data collection method calculating velocity P
/ float times were mostly similar so method+data was highly accurate
X high chance of human error (starting stopwatch too early/ too late due to reaction time)
suggest improvements to data collection method calculating velocity P
- larger sample size (more sections of river) - results more representative of entire river
- use sites in lower+middle course - shows a greater change in velocity
evaluate effectiveness of velocity presentation technique
bar graph:
/ shows exact figures so reliable, easy to identify anomalies to remove from results so reduces bias, indicates the reliability of our method+data
X doesn’t show velocity (shows time taken) - not usable to draw conclusions
scatter graph:
/ easy to interpret as shows (positive) correlation
X
justify the data collection method used to find stone size/shape
- picked a rock from river bed at every 0.5m without looking - ensures results were systematic+ unbiased
- measured length/ width/ height of each stone - calculated an average to eliminate random errors+ increase accuracy
- both showed how the size+shape of rocks changes as you move downstream - shows effects of erosion and whether the river follows the model
describe interpretation of stone size+shape from method P
- stones are smaller downstream - eroded by abrasion+ attrition breaking them into smaller pieces
- stones are more rounded downstream - surface of rocs eroded by abrasion+ attrition
evaluate the effectiveness of the method used to find stone size+shape P
stone size:
/ provides unbiased results as rocks collected systematically+ without looking
X small sample size at locations in upper course (site 1 had a narrow channel so only 4 rocks collected) which increases bias
stone shape:
/ can identify modal stone shape for each site as largest number in each row
X unreliable as based on personal opinion (qualitative data so subjective) so results are not reproducible
state improvements to the method used to find stone size+shape P
- collect 30 rocks at each site - larger sample size provides a more precise average size+ modal shape