NY BAR REVIEW EVIDENCE 3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

privileges

A

socially valuable

confident that communications will be confidential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

socially valuable

A

atty client
psychologist patient
doctor patient
spousal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

atty client

A

protects confidential communication made for purpose of seeking legal advice and directed to atty who’s been consulted for that purpose

render legal advice or services in course of professional relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

client confidentiality

A

reasonable expectation of privacy under the circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

eavesdropper

A

privilege still applies
eavesdropper cannot testify
doesn’t negate intent of client to keep confidential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

third party with client

A

facilitates communication - communication privileged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

client, in atty-client privilege context includes

A

corporations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

psychologist patient

A

registered psych and client - same protection as atty client
NOT PSYCHIATRIST
NOT SOCIAL WORKER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

PSYCHIATRIST

SOCIAL WORKER - federal

A

YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

physician patient

A
doctor
nurse
dentist
podiatrist
chiropractor
all assistants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

doctor patient privilege in federal

A

NONE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

physician patient definition

A

attending in a professional capacity - treatment or diagnosis of patient
information has to be necessary for doctor to action that capacity, for diagnosis or treatment

observation and communication- ONLY such that requires expert professional knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

spousal / marital communication privilege

A

any confidential communication made during marriage, even if marriage is now over.
civil and criminal
ONLY communications
NOT observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

non testifying spouse

A

CONTROLS the privilege

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

spouse immunity / testimony in ny

A

NONE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

criminal in ny - spousal immunity

A

spouse CANNOT refuse to testify on grounds that are married

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

witness competency

A

admissible only if competent

18
Q

adultery in ny

A

ny - adultery - spuses cannot testify against each other

testify only to prove the marriage, prove the adultery, or disprove defense that was preseneted

19
Q

civil trial ny about a deceased or mentally ill

A

interested CANNOT testify on own behalf

20
Q

adultery in ny

A

ny - adultery - spouses cannot testify against each other

testify only to prove the marriage, prove the adultery, or disprove defense that was presented

21
Q

civil trial ny about a deceased or mentally ill

A

interested CANNOT testify on own behalf

22
Q

DEAD MAN STATUTE

A

death or mental illness seals lips of party to a transaction

adversarial balance is achieved by sealing the lips of the surviving party

23
Q

under 9 in ny - competency

A

NOT - rebuttable presumption

rebut - must understand nature of the oath

24
Q

understanding an oath

A

truth v. lie
need for telling the truth
false testimony may be punished

25
Q

witness with a criminal conviction- competency

A

YES

26
Q

impeach my own witness - federal

A

YES

27
Q

impeach my own witness - ny

A

NO

28
Q

opponent tries to impeach my competent witness - ny

A

prior inconsistent statement made in writing subscribed by the witness
or witness made it while under oath
or witness’ prior crimes - felonies , misdemeanors
if witness denies it - can present extrinsic evidence of conviction

29
Q

traffic infraction
juvenile adjudication
arrests
indictments

A

NOT crimes

30
Q

ny hasnt codified

A

old crime new crime
misdemeanor felony
crimes of dishonesty and not of dishonesty

31
Q

pretrial ruling

A

examine probative value credibility v. risk of unfair prejudice to defendant

32
Q

prior convictions in ny

A

less relevant to credibility when lapse of time bw prior crime and charged crime
prior conviction was impulsive violence, seldom has any logical bearing on defendant’s credibility at time of trial
crimes occasioned by addiction to drug or alcohol

33
Q

unfair prejudice risk- prior conviction similar to current trial

A

difficult for jury not to consider prior conviction , even if we give a limiting instruction

34
Q

effect on fact finding process

A

doesn’t testify out of fear that impeachment material/ conviction will be used for
other than reason for assessing credibility

35
Q

REPUTATION ONLY

A

NO OPINION - character evidence

36
Q

federal

A

specific acts probative of truthfulness

37
Q

ny jury

A

lie on witness stand / criminal vicious immoral acts

advancement of self interest ahead of principal or interests of society

38
Q

criminal - advance ruling

A

which ones prosecution can cross examine him with

39
Q

expert testimony ny

A

conclusions depend on SPECIALIZED professional or scientific knowledge or skill not within ordinary training and intelligence. if YES, jury can do by itself , no need for expert

40
Q

novel scientific evidence federal

A

daubert

41
Q

novel scientific evidence ny

A

FRYE v US 1922

whether scientific techniques when properly performed produce results generally accepted in scientific community / votes