NY BAR REVIEW EVIDENCE 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

UNAVAILABILITY ny

A

cannot be found

is in custody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

prior testimony admissible in ny in CRIMINAL

A

prior testimony in related criminal trial
preliminary hearing
hearing art 660 CRIMINAL LAW -testimony of witnesses who might not be available later
full and fair opportunity to cross examine witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

prior testimony INADMISSIBLE in ny CRIMINAL

A

if was given during a prior suppression hearing
related grand jury
related administrative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

admissible in criminal ny

A

on same charge that its related to
post judgment proceeding challenging a conviction
based on same charge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

exception of CHARACTER EVIDENCE ny

A

acted in conformity in a particular occasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

character

A

did certain act in past

has certain reputation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

character NOT

A

on prior occasion committed another robbery

has reputation in community as a robber

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

prior bad acts

A

relevant other than to show propensity - admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

NON propensity purposes for which character evidence may be admitted

A

motive
intent
purpose to use particular means to effect the robbery
absence of mistake or accident
identity of bank robber - used in limited circumstances - unique, distinctive modus operandi
common scheme or plan - proof of one establishes the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

procedure for introducing non propensity evidence in a trial MIMIC

A

determine the specific non propensity purpose for which evidence is relevant
whether evidence tends logically to prove issue upon which its offered, and material, not cumulative
weight probative value against potential of undue prejudice to defendant - bad person who commits crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

advance ruling on evidence

A

outside presence of jury

if not, greater probability of error and waste of scarce judicial resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

prior bad act ny

A

clear and convincing evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

prior bad act federal

A

preponderance of evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

defendant’s evidence ny

A

his liberty is at stake, so permitted to input evidence of good character that’s relevant to the crime he’s being charged with, REPUTATION ONLY, NOT opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ONLY REPUTATION in ny

A

NOT OPINION AND REPUTATION like in federal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

prior conviction

A

negating that character trait

17
Q

honesty

A

larceny, forgery, perjury. NOT assault, as assault doesn’t negate the quality of honesty

18
Q

murder

A

peaceful person

shooting dogs - negates character trait for peacefulness

19
Q

habit displays

A

behavior in past v. on this particular occasion

20
Q

habit definition

A

deliberate and repetitive process by person in complete control of circumstances