NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT Flashcards
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
According to Denhardt (2008), the fiscal crisis of the 1970’s led to the search for efforts to produce a government that works better and costs less (Similar to Wilson 1887 and the orthodoxy period). This lead to an economic rationalism that introduced measures such as contracting out and privatization (Denhardt, 2008). The NPM emphasizes private sector values (competition, preference for market mechanisms, respect for the entrepreneurial spirit, efficiency and effectiveness) and private approaches such privatization, performance measurement, and strategic planning (Denhardt, 2008). Seeks to use private sector and business approaches in the public sector to generate greater efficiency.
Public managers are urged to STEER not row their organizations and to find new and innovative ways (entrepreneur) to achieve results or to privatize functions previously provided by government. e.g. E-government etc.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Denhardt and Denhardt (2008)
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Denhardt and Denhardt (2008)- NPM is linked to the public choice perspective in Public Administration which views the government from the standpoint of markets and customers.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Lynn (1996)-
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Lynn (1996)-NPM came from the public policy schools that developed in the 1970s and from the managerialist movement around the world (Pollitt, 1990).
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
What separates NPM from the Orthodoxy view of PA is the manner with which the bureaucrat is viewed-more of a normative model. Seeks to empower the public administrator and allow them more discretion to be risk-takers and entrepreneurs. *****SEE TABLE ON PAGE 554 OF DENHARDT AND DENHARDT ARTICLE.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The GRACE COMMISSION 1982
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The GRACE COMMISSION 1982 formed by President Ronald Reagan was an investigation requested by United States President Ronald Reagan, in 1982. The focus of it was waste and inefficiency in the US Federal government. Its head, businessman J. Peter Grace,[1] asked the members of that commission to “be bold” and “work like tireless bloodhounds. Don’t leave any stone unturned in your search to root out inefficiency. The Grace Commission Report was presented to Congress in January 1984 and was ignored. The report said that one-third of all income taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency in the federal government, and another one-third escapes collection owing to the underground economy. “With two thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt and by federal government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services [that] taxpayers expect from their government.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted (1992)-Reinventing Government
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted (1992)-Reinventing Government
NPM does away with the old politics-administration dichotomy by incorporating the word governance. “Any serious student of government or PA would likely argue that is it difficult if not impossible to unbundle politics from governance” (Page 267).
Osborne and Gaebler call for building a culture of creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation in public management.
Provided a conceptual framework outlining ten principles that captured the essence of New Public Management (Denhardt, 2008, Page 142-143). According to Denhardt (2008), Reinventing Government provided strategies for reforming government which in turn captured the essence of the NPM movement. Three of the most resonating values include the market model, the public entrepreneur, and citizens as customers.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT.
Three of the most resonating values include the market model, the public entrepreneur, and citizens as customers.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Three of the most resonating values include the market model, the public entrepreneur, and citizens as customers.
Market Model- There should be competition between the public and private sector, Competition should be in vying for public contracts, competition among public agencies, and competition among governmental units to provide services to internal customers. It deals with regulated competition in which government retains the authority and responsibility to set rules governing transactions. According to Denhardt (2008), underlying the market model is an element of faith that the free play of the market forces will bring the self-interested participants (individuals, social groups, agencies) into equilibrium that represents the maximum achievable social good.
The relationship between public agencies and their customers is understood as based on self-interest, involving transactions similar to those occurring in the marketplace
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Three of the most resonating values include the market model, the public entrepreneur, and citizens as customers.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Three of the most resonating values include the market model, the public entrepreneur, and citizens as customers.
Citizens as Customers- Customer driven government must listen to their customers choices between competing services providers and provide customers with resources to use in selecting their own service providers. Therefore, government should not waste time and money providing a myriad of services which leads to waste and inefficiency. Instead, government should only provide the services that narrow self-interested customers (i.e. citizens) covet.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Three of the most resonating values include the market model, the public entrepreneur, and citizens as customers.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Three of the most resonating values include the market model, the public entrepreneur, and citizens as customers.
Public Entrepreneur-Public administrators should be innovative, creative, and use resources in a way that maximize productivity and effectiveness. Denotes a self-interested public administrator acting on his/her own self-interest (or the interest of the agency).
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Denhardt and Denhardt (2007),
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
According to Denhardt and Denhardt (2007), what differentiates this NPM from the Old PA is that the Old PA what concerned with attaining efficiency with the use of rules, regulations, procedures, top down control, rigid budgeting and hierarchy which only served to stymy and constrain the public administrator. NPM seeks to do away with all these rules, procedures and controls in order to free-up the public administrator to be more innovative.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Hood, Christopher (1991)- A Public Management for All Seasons
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Hood, Christopher (1991)- A Public Management for All Seasons
The emergence of NPM can be tied to four trends within PA:1) Attempts to slow down the growth of government; 2) Shift towards privatization and away from core government institutions; 3) The development of automation in particular information technology in the production and institution of public services and ; 4) The development of a more international agenda focused on intergovernmental cooperation as opposed to individual country specialisms in PA. NPM stresses an emphasis on greater private sector styles of management.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The National Performance Review (1993) From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The National Performance Review (1993) From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less
Legislatively enacted rules, regulations, and SOP’s are stifled the entrepreneurial creativity which could be used to devise more cost-effective and efficient means for bureaucracies to operate.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The National Performance Review (1993) From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The National Performance Review (1993) From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less
Precluding the formation of the National Performance Review, President Clinton stated that the goal was to make a federal government that would be less expensive and more efficient while changing the culture of the national bureaucracy from complacency and entitlement towards one of initiative and empowerment (denoted entrepreneurial traits of innovativeness and creativity). The public believes that that the government wastes money and that government is broken. The wasteful of government is attributed to the myriad of large, top-down and centralized bureaucracies created from the 1930’s to the 1960’s and were patterned after corporate hierarchical bureaucracies in which tasks were broken down into parts and defined by specific rules and regulations. However, in today’s world of rapid change, lightning quick information, global competition, demanding customers, and quick information technologies, the traditional bureaucracies do not work very well. Simple procedures require navigating various layers of paperwork and procedures.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The National Performance Review (1993) From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The National Performance Review (1993) From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less
The problems of bureaucracy are wrought in issues of red tape and regulation that stifles bureaucratic creativity [SIDE NOTE-The need for more of an entrepreneurial spirit]. Bureaucrats are good people who are essentially caught in bad systems. Congress has created within agencies an independent office of the inspector general whose supervision has intimidated federal employees to the point where many are scared to deviate from SOP’s. In attempts to prevent corruption and poor performance, more agencies are constantly created to monitor the agency and prevent deviations from standard practice. However, innovation requires deviation from the norm-which is not observed.
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The National Performance Review (1993) From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less
NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The National Performance Review (1993) From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less
SOLUTIONS to creating more entrepreneurial organizations include cutting red tape, putting customers or those who receive benefit from services first (listening to the needs of customers, restructure operations to meet customer needs, create incentives that drive employees to put customers first), empowering employees to get results (strip away layers through less centralization). Such an attempt will take time.