Mod 3, Communicating Science Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Outline the differences between scientific and journalistic articles.

A

Scientific/academic articles have to precise: press/journalism need to make money
A journalist summaries findings and conclusions using everyday accessible terms, without any advanced data analyses, methodologies, or research
A scientist must write the entire detailed account of the rigid scientific process, as in the previous chapter
A journalist is likely unsure on how the data was collected and analyzed, and may not be able to clearly report it; they also were not involved in the data collection and research process being a discussed while a scientist is
A journalist is not trained to hold to academic standards of objectivity: subjective opinions and biases are likely to infiltrate the internal validity and external validity of their writing
A journalist is not entitled to submit their writing for peer review, and is only examined by editors with no scientific training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define the abstract of an article.

A

summary of the study (immediately follows the articles’ titles and authors name), contains info about study goals, hypotheses, variables, methods, and findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define the introduction.

A

review of prior research, current research rationale, hypotheses, follows the abstract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define the methods section.

A

participants/subjects, study design, materials, procedures, operationally define all variables, allows for replications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define the results section.

A

Results: statistical analyses, tables, figures,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define the discussion section.

A

explanation of the findings, evaluation of the study, suggestions for the future, interpretation of the findings, why the results turned out this way and applications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hedging

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When do results need to be included on a paper?

A

results can never be omitted regardless of their outcome, and statistics effect sizes, and analysis of data must always be included

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define effect size

A

measure of the strength of a particular finding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define confidence intervals

A

indicate the likelihood that a statistic will fall between a range of values around the variable’s mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly