Methodology Evaluations Flashcards
Quasi experiments: positives
- Allows study of things that could not be studied in any other way.
Quasi experiments: negatives
- Cannot draw cause and effect conclusion
- Not randomly allocated (increase variables= bias)
- Extraneous variables
- Difficult to replicate
- Characteristics= low population validity
Questionnaire: positives
- Easy + quick + cheap
- Allow to collect data from a large sample
- Impersonal nature= decrease social desirability bias.
Questionnaire: negatives
- Takes lots of time of design
- Only by people who can read and write= bias
Structured Interviews: positives
1.Easily repeated= standardised
2. Answers are predictable= easy to analyse
Structured Interviews: negatives
- Interviewer behaviour= decrease reliability
- Interviewer expectations may influence answers (interviewer bias).
Semi-structured Interviews: positives
- More details obtained from questions
- Tailor questions for specific response= deeper insight.
Semi-structured Interviews: negatives
- Interviewer needs more skills
- Lack objectivity= instant nature
- No time to reflect on response
- More expensive.
Content analysis: positives
- Increase ecological validity
- sources are retained= replicated
Content analyses: negatives
- Observer bias= reduce objectivity and reduce validity (interpret behaviour differently).
Case studies: positives
- In-depth data of behaviour that is rare
- Complex interaction studied.
Case studies: negatives
- Hard to generalise individual cases (with unique characteristics)
- Patient collection= unreliable
Participant observations: positives
- Reduce demand characteristics
- Research people who would be very different to observe.
Participant observations: negatives
- Observer bias (expectations affect their perception of events)
- Unreliable= data relies on memory
Non-participant observations: positives
- Reduce observer bias
- Produce valid + reliable findings.
Non-participant observations: negatives
Correlational studies: positives
- Has its own specific value
- Good to investigate trends in data
- Easily repeated = more reliable
Correlational studies: negatives
- Misinterpret correlations = false premises
- Lack internal/ external validity
Primary data: positives
- More control over data
- Designed to fit aims and hypothesis
Primary data: negatives
- Takes a long time + expensive
Secondary data: positives
- More simple + cheaper + quicker
- Know if the data is significant to the study
Secondary data: negatives
- Data could not be exact to the study
Quantitative: positives
- Easy to analyse = draw conclusions easily
- Allows descriptive statistics
Quantitative: negatives
- Oversimplified = conclusion meaningless
Qualitative: positives
- Detailed info = unexpected insights thoughts and feelings
- Not restricted by previous expectations
Qualitative: negatives
- Complex to understand
- Difficult to analyse.