Memory Flashcards
Multi-store memory
Sensory lasts less than one second and is very limited capacity
Short term- holds approx 7 chunks of info for less than 1 minute
Long-term store - holds unlimited info up to a lifetime
Recency and primacy effect
Recency- info received later recalled better than earlier info
Primacy- first info received Is recalled better than subsequent info
Murdock
Aim- to provide evidence to support multi-store explanation of memory
Method- participants learnt list of words then recalled in any order
Results- end words recalled first beggining also quite well, middle forgotten
Conclusion- provides evidence for short term and lone term stores
Stages of memory
Encoding- changing info so that it can be stored
Storage- holding info in the memory system
Retrieval- recovering info from storage
Reconstructive memory
Altering our recollection of things so that they make more sense to us
Barlett
Aim- when giving something unfamiliar to remember you would alter the info
Method- read story called war of the ghosts, retold the story as accuarately as poss.
Results- difficult to remember certain bits concerned with spirits so changed it to make sense to them.
Conclusion- our memory is influenced by our own beliefs
Levels of processing
The depth at which info is thought about when trying to learn it
Structural- physical appearance
Phonetic- sound of words
Semantic- meaning of words
Craik and Lockhart
Aim- type of Q asked about words will have an affect on number of words recalled.
Method- list of words, asked Q about each, used difference levels of processing .
Results- 70% semantic, 35% phonetic, 15% structural
Conclusion- more deeply info is processed the more likely it is to be remembered
Interference
Things that we have learnt that make it difficult to recall other info that we have learnt
Retroactive and proactive interference
Retroactive- when info we have previously learnt hinders our ability to recall info we have previously learnt
Proactive- when info we have already learnt hinders our ability to recall new info
Underwood and postman
Aim- to see if new learning interferes with previous learning
Method- 2 groups. Learnt list of words then a second list of words.group b only learnt first list.
Results- group b was more accurate
Conclusion- new learning will cause people to recall previously learned info less accurately
Context
The general setting or environment in which activities happen
2 diff types of amnesia
Anterograde- unable to learn new info
Retrograde- unable to remember new info can remember old tho
Hippocampus
A brain structure that is crucial for memory
Godden and baddely
Aim- to learn if u are tested in the same environment will u recall more info than those who learn in diff environment
Method- deap see divers. 4 groups. Same list of words
Results- groups 1 and 3 recalled 40% more words than 2 and 4
Conclusion- recall of info will be better if it happens in the same context that learning takes place