Memory Flashcards

1
Q

What is meant by “coding” in memory?

A

Coding refers to the format or ‘type’ of information stored in each memory store. In STM, coding is acoustic, while in LTM, it is semantic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What study demonstrated the differences in coding between STM and LTM?

A

Baddeley (1966) showed that STM recall is affected by acoustically-similar words, whereas LTM recall is affected by semantically-similar words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the capacity of STM, according to Miller?

A

The capacity of STM is 7 ± 2 items, based on Miller’s theory of chunking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Jacobs discover about digit and letter span?

A

Jacobs found that the mean digit span was 9.3, and the mean letter span was 7.3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the capacity of LTM?

A

The capacity of LTM is thought to be unlimited.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the duration of STM, and who demonstrated this?

A

The duration of STM is 18-30 seconds, as shown by Petersen et al. (1959) using a consonant syllable recall task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is the duration of LTM demonstrated, and what is its approximate length?

A

Bahrick et al. (1975) showed LTM duration is unlimited by demonstrating high recall of classmates after 15 and even 46 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Petersen et al. (1959) conclude about STM?

A

Increasing retention intervals (preventing rehearsal) significantly reduces accuracy in STM recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a criticism of early memory studies like Jacobs’?

A

Early studies lacked standardisation and control, potentially allowing extraneous variables to affect results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does Miller’s capacity estimate differ from more recent research?

A

Recent studies suggest STM capacity is closer to 4 chunks, not the 5-9 proposed by Miller.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the evaluation points for research into coding,capacity and duration?

A

+) Strength of Barick et al’s study is high ecological validity
-) Petersen and Miller studies have low mundane realism
-) Miller’s estimate was exaggerated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is a Barick et al’s study having low ecological validity a strength of research into coding, capacity and duration?

A

P - high ecological valdiity
Ev - used meaningful stimuli like classmate photos
Ex - reflects real-life learning situations, increasing generalisability
L - suggests findings are highly applicable to everyday memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is Petersen et al study and Miller’s study having low mundane realism a limitation of research into coding, capacity and duration?

A

P - These studies have low mundane realism.
Ev - Petersen used consonant syllables, and Miller used artificial stimuli.
Ex - These do not reflect how memory is used in real-life learning.
L - Findings may lack ecological validity and are harder to generalise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is Miller’s STM capacity being exaggerated a limitation of research into coding, capacity and duration?

A

P - Miller’s 7 ± 2 estimate may be exaggerated.
Ev - Recent research suggests a smaller capacity of 4 chunks.
Ex - This may be due to outdated methods and lack of control over variables.
L - Findings may need revising to reflect more accurate, modern estimates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Multi-Store Model (MSM) of memory?

A

The MSM explains how memory is stored, transferred, retrieved, and forgotten, with three main stores: sensory register, STM, and LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the sensory register in the MSM?

A

The sensory register receives input from the senses, has a huge capacity, but a very short duration of less than half a second.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What must occur for information to pass from the sensory register to STM?

A

Attention must be paid to the sensory input for it to transfer into STM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How is STM encoded, and what are its capacity and duration?

A

STM is acoustically encoded, with a capacity of 7 ± 2 items (Miller) and a duration of 18-30 seconds (Petersen).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What role does maintenance rehearsal play in the MSM?

A

Repeating information allows it to stay in STM, while prolonged maintenance rehearsal transfers it into LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the characteristics of LTM in the MSM?

A

LTM is semantically encoded, has an unlimited capacity, and can last over 46 years (Bahrick et al.).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is retrieval in the context of MSM?

A

Retrieval is when information from LTM is transferred back into STM for use, continuing through the maintenance loop.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the types of LTM identified by Tulving?

A

Tulving proposed procedural (unconscious), semantic (conscious), and episodic memory types, which are not differentiated in the MSM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What does Craik and Watkins (1973) suggest about rehearsal?

A

They propose that elaborative rehearsal, linking new information to existing knowledge, is more important than prolonged rehearsal for transferring STM to LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How does the MSM differentiate between STM and LTM?

A

The MSM highlights qualitative differences, such as STM being acoustically encoded with short duration, and LTM being semantically encoded with long duration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the evaluation points for the multi-store model?

A

-) Tulving found 3 different types of LTM
+) accurately distinguishes between STM and LTM
-) KF case study showed there are different types of STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What does research on STM by Shallice and Warrington suggest about the MSM?

A

Point**: MSM incorrectly represents STM as a unitary store.
Evidence: KF’s case showed poor auditory STM recall but intact visual STM, suggesting multiple STM types.
Explanation: This contradicts the MSM’s single-store view of STM.
Link: It indicates the MSM lacks complexity in explaining STM processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

How is MSM only having 1 LTM store a limitation of MSM?

A

Back: Point: MSM fails to account for different types of LTM.
Evidence: Tulving identified procedural (unconscious) and semantic (conscious) memory types, which the MSM does not reflect.
Explanation: This challenges the MSM’s view of LTM as a single, unitary store.
Link: It suggests the MSM oversimplifies LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What does research on STM by Shallice and Warrington suggest about the MSM?

A

Point: MSM incorrectly represents STM as a unitary store.
Evidence: KF’s case showed poor auditory STM recall but intact visual STM, suggesting multiple STM types.
Explanation: This contradicts the MSM’s single-store view of STM.
Link: It indicates the MSM lacks complexity in explaining STM processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What are the three types of long-term memory (LTM)?

A

: Episodic, semantic, and procedural memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is episodic memory?

A

Episodic memory involves personal memories, including details about when and how events occurred and associated people and places (e.g., a wedding).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is semantic memory?

A

Semantic memory involves knowledge of the world, including meanings of words, concepts, and themes (e.g., using one concept to understand another).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is procedural memory?

A

Procedural memory involves memories of learned skills, such as swimming or driving, and is recalled unconsciously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Which types of LTM are recalled consciously, and which are recalled unconsciously?

A

Episodic and semantic memories are recalled consciously, while procedural memories are recalled unconsciously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What did Petersen et al. discover about episodic and semantic memory?

A

Episodic memories are recalled from the right prefrontal cortex, and semantic memories are recalled from the left prefrontal cortex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What practical application does understanding types of LTM have?

A

Belleville et al. noted that understanding episodic memory can help develop treatments for mild cognitive impairments, which often affect episodic memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

How do Cohen and Squire classify long-term memory?

A

They distinguish between declarative memory (episodic and semantic, recalled consciously) and non-declarative memory (procedural, recalled unconsciously).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

How do HM and Clive Wearing’s cases support types of LTM?

A

They show that episodic memory can be impaired while procedural and semantic memories remain intact, supporting the idea of separate LTM types.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What example from Clive Wearing’s case illustrates different types of LTM?

A

Clive Wearing could still play the piano (procedural) and understand music (semantic) but couldn’t recall recent events (episodic).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What are the evaluation points for types of LTM?

A

+) research support from Petersen et al says that there are different types of LTM
-)LTM types may be too similar to be distinct
+) case studies show that LTM types are distinct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

How is research support from Petersen et al a strength of types of long term memory?

A

Front: What neurological evidence supports the existence of different LTM types?
Back: Point: Petersen et al. demonstrated different neurological bases for LTM types.
Evidence: Episodic memory is recalled from the right prefrontal cortex, and semantic memory from the left prefrontal cortex.
Explanation: This supports the idea that LTM types are separate.
Link: It provides biological evidence for Tulving’s classification of LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

How is LTM memory types being too similar to be distinct a limitation of types of LTM?

A

P -similarity between types of LTM suggests they may not be truly distinct
Ev - episodic and semantic memories are both declarative and episodic memories can transform into semantic memories over time. Also, semantic and procedural memory is linked as we can think clearly usinf knoiwledge (SMNTC) without thinking about every word (procedural)
Ex - overlap between LTM challenges idea they are separate
L - suggests boundaries between LTM types may not have been clear as Tulving originlly thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

How do case studies of HM and Clive Wearing support that LTM has different types of LTM?

A

Front: How do HM and Clive Wearing’s cases support LTM classification?
Back: Point: Case studies show the separation of LTM types.
Evidence: Clive Wearing retained procedural (e.g., playing piano) and semantic memory but lost episodic memory.
Explanation: This demonstrates that different areas of the brain are involved in separate LTM types.
Link: The evidence strengthens the idea that LTM is not a unitary system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What does the Working Memory Model (WMM) suggest about short-term memory (STM)?

A

STM is made up of four components: the central executive, phonological loop, visuo-spatial sketchpad, and episodic buffer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What is the role of the central executive in the WMM?

A

The central executive is an attentional process with a very limited capacity, responsible for allocating tasks to the three slave systems.

45
Q

What is the phonological loop?

A

It processes auditory information and enables maintenance rehearsal. It consists of the phonological store (stores the words you hear) and the articulatory process (repeats them silently).

46
Q

What does the visuo-spatial sketchpad (VSS) do?

A

It processes visual and spatial information, creating a ‘complete picture.’ It is divided into the visual cache (stores visual data) and the inner scribe (records spatial arrangements).

47
Q

What is the capacity of the visuo-spatial sketchpad?

A

: The capacity is about 4-5 chunks, according to Baddeley.

48
Q

What is the episodic buffer?

A

: The episodic buffer integrates information from the phonological loop, visuo-spatial sketchpad, and LTM, acting as a storage component for the central executive.

49
Q

How is the lack of clarity regarding the CE a limitation of the WMM?

A

Point: The central executive is not precisely defined.
Evidence: It is described vaguely as an ‘attentional process,’ and it is unclear if it is made of sub-components or part of a larger system.
Explanation: This lack of clarity reduces the accuracy and reliability of the WMM.
Link: It suggests the model’s depiction of the central executive is incomplete.

50
Q

What are the evaluation points for the WMM?

A

+) research evidence from S+W
-) CE lacks clarity
+) dual task performance studies support

51
Q

How is research evidence from Shallice and Warrington a strength of the WMM?

A

Point: research evidence from Shallice and Warrington
Evidence: KF had poor STM recall for auditory stimuli but good recall for visual stimuli, so auditory and visual are separate stores
Explanation: This aligns with the WMM’s distinction between the phonological loop (auditory) and the visuo-spatial sketchpad (visual),
Link: It strengthens the validity of the WMM.

52
Q

How does dual-task performance support the WMM?

A

Point: Dual-task performance studies show the central executive has limited capacity.
Evidence: Performance decreases when participants perform a visual and verbal task simultaneously.
Explanation: This suggests the central executive cannot manage high cognitive loads, as predicted by the WMM.
Link: It supports the model’s depiction of the central executive and the competition between slave systems

53
Q

What does McGeoch and McDonald’s study suggest about the relationship between similarity and forgetting?

A

: There is a positive correlation between the extent of forgetting and the similarity of the interfering materials.

53
Q

What are the two types of interference?

A

Retroactive interference: New memories block the recollection of old memories.
Proactive interference: Old memories block the recollection of new memories.

54
Q

What is interference in memory?

A

Interference occurs when the recall of one memory blocks the recall of another, leading to forgetting or distorted perceptions.

55
Q

What did McGeoch and McDonald (1931) demonstrate about retroactive interference?

A

Participants who learned a list of synonyms recalled an average of 3.1 fewer correct items compared to a control group, showing that greater similarity between materials leads to more forgetting.

56
Q

How does Baddeley and Hitch’s study of rugby players support interference theory?

A

Players who played more games experienced more interference, making it harder to recall earlier games. This is an example of retroactive interference.

57
Q

What are the evaluation points for explanations for forgetting?

A

+) lab studies
-) interference studies do not reflect real life
-) lacks mundane realism

58
Q

How is interference studies not reflecting real life a limitation?

A

Point: Many interference studies are conducted in short time intervals.
Evidence: Participants recall information 1-2 hours after learning it, unlike real life, where recall often occurs days later (e.g., during exams).
Explanation: This may overstate the impact of interference, as real-life forgetting may involve other factors.
Link: This suggests interference might not fully explain forgetting from LTM in real-world scenarios.

59
Q

How are lab studies a strength of interferene?

A

Point: Lab studies provide strong evidence for interference.
Evidence: They use highly controlled conditions, standardised instructions, and eliminate confounding variables.
Explanation: This ensures that the findings are reliable and accurately reflect the impact of interference on memory.
Link: The consistent demonstration of interference increases the theory’s validity.

60
Q

How is interference studies not reflecting real life a limitation of interference?

A

Point: Many interference studies are conducted in short time intervals.
Evidence: Participants recall information 1-2 hours after learning it, unlike real life, where recall often occurs days later (e.g., during exams).
Explanation: This may overstate the impact of interference, as real-life forgetting may involve other factors.
Link: This suggests interference might not fully explain forgetting from LTM in real-world scenarios.

61
Q

What is retrieval failure in memory?

A

Retrieval failure occurs when the cues present at encoding are not available at recall, leading to forgetting.

62
Q

What is the encoding specificity principle (ESP)?

A

The ESP, proposed by Tulving, suggests that information is best recalled when the cues at encoding match those at retrieval

63
Q

What are the two types of retrieval failure?

A

Context-dependent forgetting: External cues at encoding differ from those at recall.
State-dependent forgetting: Internal cues at encoding differ from those at recall.

64
Q

How did Godden and Baddeley (1975) demonstrate context-dependent forgetting?

A

Deep-water divers recalled more words when the encoding and recall environments matched (e.g., both underwater or both on land).

65
Q

How did Carter and Cassaday (1998) demonstrate state-dependent forgetting?

A

Participants on anti-histamines had 40% higher recall accuracy when their internal states at encoding and recall matched.

66
Q

What are the evaluation points for retrieval failure?

A

+) strong experimental support
-) lacks ecological validity
-) not a universal explanation

67
Q

How is retrieval failure not being a universal explanation a limitation of retrieval failure

A

Point: It does not apply to all types of memory.
Evidence: Godden and Baddeley found no differences in recognition tasks, suggesting retrieval failure mainly affects recall.
Explanation: This shows retrieval failure is limited to specific memory types and contexts.
Link: Its scope is narrow, reducing generalizability.

68
Q

How is retrieval failure lacking ecological validity a limitation f retireval failure?

A

Point: Retrieval failure studies may not reflect real-life memory processes.
Evidence: Baddeley argued that conditions like water and land are rare in everyday life.
Explanation: Retrieval failure may only apply to distinct situations, limiting its relevance for day-to-day forgetting.
Link: This weakens its applicability outside experimental settings.

69
Q
A

Point: Retrieval failure is supported by studies with strict controls.
Evidence: Eysenck emphasized its importance, with lab experiments reducing confounding variables.
Explanation: This increases confidence in conclusions and the validity of retrieval failure as an explanation for forgetting.
Link: Findings are reliable due to controlled methodologies

70
Q

What are the evaluation points for misleading information, EWT?

A

+) Artificial tasks reduce validity
-) Demand characteristics
-)Own age bias

71
Q

How is artificial tasks reducing validity a limitation of misleading information EWT?

A

Point: The use of artificial tasks undermines the ecological validity of EWT studies.
Evidence: Loftus and Palmer used film clips of car crashes, which lack the emotional intensity of real-life events.
Explain: This limits the applicability of findings to real-world situations where anxiety may significantly influence recall.
Link: As a result, the conclusions about the effects of leading questions may not fully reflect actual eyewitness testimony.

72
Q

How is demand characteristics a limitation of EWT misleading information?

A

Point: Demand characteristics reduce the reliability of EWT studies.
Evidence: Zaragosa and McCloskey argue participants might guess answers to please the researcher, leading to socially desirable responses.
Explain: This “Please-U” effect may bias findings and undermine the validity of conclusions about memory recall.
Link: Consequently, the experimental results might not reliably predict eyewitness behavior in real-world situations.

73
Q

How is own age bias a limitation of misleading questions, EWT?

A

Point: EWT studies often fail to account for own age bias.
Evidence: Anastasi and Rhodes showed that individuals recall faces of their own age group with higher accuracy than those of other age groups.
Explain: Using predominantly young targets may skew results, particularly for older participants, leading to underrepresentation of their accuracy.
Link: This highlights the need for more diverse targets in EWT research to improve its generalizability.

74
Q

What is EWT?

A

EWT refers to the information an eyewitness recalls about a crime, which can be influenced by misleading information like leading questions and post-event discussions.

75
Q

What happened in the leading questions Loftus and Palmer study (1974)?

A

Participants estimated car speeds based on critical verbs in a question (e.g., “smashed” vs. “contacted”), with “smashed” eliciting higher speed estimates.

76
Q

What is response bias vs substitution explanation?

A

Response bias: Leading questions influence the response without altering memory.

Substitution: Leading questions alter the actual memory of the event (e.g., “smashed” increased false reports of broken glass)

77
Q

What is the Gabbert et al (2003) post event discussion study?

A

Participants who discussed a crime scene with another witness (seeing different details) had 71% inaccuracy rates, compared to 0% in a control group

78
Q

What is memory conformity?

A

Memory conformity occurs when witnesses adopt incorrect details from others, believing their memory to be less accurate.

79
Q

What is own age bias?

A

Anastasi and Rhodes identified a tendency for individuals to more accurately recall faces of their own age group, affecting the validity of EWT findings.

80
Q

Where are the possible demand characteristics in the Loftus and Palmer study?

A

Participants may provide answers they believe the researcher wants, influenced by social desirability bias and the “Please-U” effect.

81
Q

What are artificial tasks in EWT studies?

A

Studies like Loftus and Palmer’s use controlled conditions (e.g., film clips of crashes), which lack the emotional impact of real-life events.

82
Q

What is the role of anxiety in EWT?

A

Artificial conditions overlook the potential influence of anxiety, which could either impair (Johnson and Scott) or enhance (Yuille and Cutshall) recall accuracy.

83
Q

What are the real life applications of EWT research?

A

Understanding the impact of misleading information helps develop better interviewing techniques, like the cognitive interview, to improve the accuracy of EWT.

84
Q

What are the evaluation points for EWT anxiety?

A

-) ethical concerns
-) weapon focus effect has low IV
+) benefits the legal system RWA

85
Q

How is ethical concerns a limitation of EWT anxiety?

A

Point: The research raises ethical concerns regarding psychological harm.
Evidence: Johnson and Scott exposed participants to distressing situations, and Yuille and Cutshall required participants to recall traumatic events.
Explain: This breaches ethical guidelines, potentially causing lasting harm, and necessitates a cost-benefit analysis to justify the research.
Link: Therefore, while the studies provide valuable insights, ethical issues may undermine their overall validity.

86
Q

How is the weapon focus theory having low IV a limitation of EWT anxiety?

A

Point: The weapon focus effect might measure surprise rather than anxiety.
Evidence: Pickel found higher levels of eyewitness accuracy when unusual objects (e.g., a raw chicken) were present, indicating surprise impacts recall.
Explain: This questions the internal validity of studies focusing on weapon-related anxiety effects on eyewitness testimony (EWT).
Link: As a result, the explanatory power of the weapon focus effect in anxiety research is limited.

87
Q

How is RWA to benefiting the legal system a strength of EWT anxiety?

A

Point: Research on anxiety and EWT benefits the legal system.
Evidence: Studies like Johnson and Scott have influenced police practices, improving witness interviewing techniques.
Explain: Awareness of anxiety’s effects, such as the weapon focus effect, helps law enforcement better assess witness reliability as they can rephrase questions to not influence the recall.
Link: These studies provide valuable insights, improving the accuracy and fairness of judicial processes.

88
Q

What is anxiety?

A

Anxiety is a physiological response to external pressures, characterized by increased heart rate, vasoconstriction of blood vessels, and elevated sweat production.

89
Q

What is anxiety’s effect on recall?

A

Anxiety can have both positive and negative effects on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony, influencing attention and memory recall.

90
Q

What was the aim of the Johnson and Scott (1976) study

A

To investigate whether anxiety negatively impacts the accuracy of eyewitness identification.

91
Q

What did Johnson and Scott find?

A

High-anxiety participants, exposed to a man holding a bloody knife, had 16% lower recall accuracy compared to low-anxiety participants who saw a man with a greasy pen.

92
Q

What is the tunnel theory/ weapon focus effect?

A

The weapon focus effect explains reduced recall accuracy by suggesting attention is drawn to the weapon, narrowing focus due to anxiety.

93
Q

What was the aim of yuille and cutshall study (1986)?

A

To explore the positive effects of anxiety on eyewitness accuracy in a real-life shooting.

94
Q

What were the findings of Yuille and cutshall (1986) study?

A

Participants with higher anxiety levels showed 11% better recall accuracy, suggesting anxiety enhances attention to cues during traumatic events.

95
Q

What are the evaluation points for improving the accuracy of EWT?

A

-) time-consuming, requires training
+) flexible/adaptable
+) effective in improving accuracy

96
Q

How is time-consuming a limitation of improving the accuracy of the congitive approach?

A

Point: The cognitive interview is time-consuming and requires specialized training.
Evidence: Kebbel and Wagstaff (2004) argued that only a few hours of training is insufficient to teach interviewers the necessary social skills for the enhanced version of the cognitive interview.
Explain: This limits the practical application of the technique in many police forces that lack the time and resources to provide comprehensive training.
Link: As a result, despite its potential benefits, the cognitive interview’s complexity can hinder its widespread use and effectiveness.

97
Q

How is flexibility in use a limitation of improving the accuracy of EWT?

A

Point: The cognitive interview can be adapted for practical use.
Evidence: Milne and Bull (2002) found that using just the “context reinstatement” and “report everything” techniques improved the accuracy of recall.
Explain: This shows that even with limited training, police can still use parts of the cognitive interview to improve accuracy, making it more feasible for real-world applications.
Link: The cognitive interview’s adaptability means it can be effective even in less-than-ideal circumstances, enhancing its usefulness in criminal investigations.

98
Q

How is being effective in improving accuracy a strength of the congitive interview?

A

Point: The cognitive interview improves eyewitness recall accuracy.
Evidence: Kohnken et al. (1999) found that the cognitive interview increased correct recall by 81% and incorrect recall by 61%.
Explain: This method, particularly through techniques like “report everything” and “reinstate the context,” helps witnesses recall more details, enhancing the overall accuracy of EWT.
Link: Therefore, the cognitive interview is a valuable tool for improving the reliability of eyewitness testimony.

99
Q

What is the cognitive interview?

A

The cognitive interview is a method of interviewing eyewitnesses designed to increase the accuracy of recall by using techniques based on psychological theories of memory, such as retrieval failure and context-dependent forgetting.

100
Q

What are the four stages of the cognitive interview

A

Report everything – Encouraging the eyewitness to recall all details, even those that seem trivial, as they may trigger more memories.
Reinstate the context – Recalling the environment and mood at the time to prevent context-dependent forgetting.
Change the perspective – Recalling the event from different viewpoints to avoid biases or schemas.
Reverse the order – Recalling events in a different sequence, which can reduce the impact of schemas and prevent deception.

101
Q

What does the “Report Everything” stage in the cognitive interview aim to achieve?

A

It encourages witnesses to provide all details, no matter how trivial they seem, as they could serve as memory cues and help trigger more accurate recall.

102
Q

How does the “Reinstate the Context” stage in the cognitive interview reduce context-dependent forgetting?

A

By asking the witness to recall the weather, location, and their mood during the event, this stage reminds the eyewitness of external cues, making it easier to retrieve memories that are linked to those cues

103
Q

What is the purpose of “Changing the Perspective” in the cognitive interview?

A

This step asks the eyewitness to recall events from different perspectives (e.g., that of the victim or perpetrator) to prevent their own biases or pre-existing schemas from influencing their recall of events.

104
Q

Why is the “Reverse the Order” technique used in the cognitive interview?

A

Recalling events in a non-chronological order makes it difficult for eyewitnesses to fabricate details and helps minimize the influence of schemas, improving the accuracy of the testimony.

105
Q

What is the “Enhanced Cognitive Interview” developed by Fisher et al. (1987)?

A

The enhanced cognitive interview focuses on the social dynamics between the interviewer and the eyewitness, emphasizing techniques like building rapport, adjusting eye contact, and creating a comfortable atmosphere to encourage accurate recall.

106
Q

What is the main criticism of the cognitive interview in terms of practical value?

A

The cognitive interview is time-consuming and requires specialized training, which may be impractical for many police forces. Kebbel and Wagstaff argued that a few hours of training may not be enough to teach the necessary skills, especially for the enhanced cognitive interview.

107
Q

What did Kohnken et al. (1999) find about the cognitive interview’s effect on eyewitness recall?

A

Kohnken et al. found that the cognitive interview increased the recall of both correct and incorrect information, with a significant rise in the recall of incorrect details (61%), which raises concerns about its potential to introduce false memories.

108
Q

What did Milne and Bull (2002) find regarding the effectiveness of the cognitive interview?

A

Milne and Bull found that using just two elements of the cognitive interview—”report everything” and “reinstate the context”—produced the highest accuracy in eyewitness recall, suggesting that even partial use of the cognitive interview can improve the reliability of testimony.