Measurement of PA and SB Flashcards
Give reasons why it is necessary to measure children’s PA and SB
allows researchers to establish links between the two behaviours
allows determination of correlations between behaviours and health outcomes
can then re-measure to determine if an intervention has been successful
Explain why it can be complicated to measure child PA
For different people, activity happens at different times of the day and in different ways
A child will demonstrate lots of different behaviours in one day, so can be hard to capture them all
Children’s behaviour is very sporadic and very short lived (80% of PA bouts are below 10 seconds)
This is very hard to capture, especially with questionnaires
When measuring child PA, what variables need to be measured
Duration
Intensity (HR or speed of movement or energy expenditure)
Time of day when children are most active
Type of activity they’re doing
How can information about the timing and type of PA be used
to design interventions
target times when least PA occurs
Know what type of PA children are doing and therefore clearly like to do
Other than information about the PA, what other variables should be measured
Health outcomes associated with a certain level of energy expenditure
What three things need to be considered when deciding which method to use to determine levels of PA
Accuracy
validity
feasibility
What are the limitations of using questionnaires to determine a child’s level of PA
Large cognitive burden to think about and remember all activity (even more of a problem in younger children)
Children may not understand the wording of a question
Children may get bored and not complete it
Parent report is often used, but the child isn’t often with them all day
Bias, often = over-reporting
Inaccurate recall bc of the sporadic nature of child PA it’s hard to accurately recall
Is the time when you’re recording representative of a normal day
What are the limitations of using accelerators to determine PA levels
People often fail to return the monitors which are quite expensive
People may not comply or may not remember to put on
hard to differentiate between sleep and SB
might not have always been the child wearing it, could have been a friend etc
REACTIVITY (upregulation, not representative)
usually around 5% more activity on day 1 vs other days
how do researchers overcome the issue of reactivity when using accelerometers to capture data?
wear for 8 days and exclude the first day
Give reasons why it is not ideal for accelerometers to be placed on the wrist
over-estimates amount of activity and under-estimates amount of time spent sitting because children do a lot of writing which causes movement
Why is it best to get children to wear the accelrometers for as long as possible
data will be more reflective of the daily average
data will be more reliable
there is a higher correlation between activity on each day
child’s routine is more variable so more days = more representative
Briefly explain how accelerometers were validated
children doing various activities whilst undergoing indirect calorimitry and wearing accelerometers
then determine which number of counts corresponds to which level of PA
regressing analysis relates the amount of counts per minute to the intensity of PA
Why is it hard to compare between studies using accelerometer data?
different threshold values used
so differences in amount of PA at each intensity
A child’s activity would be classified in different ways by different papers
What is an epoch and how are they used to determine the intensity of PA
A period of time, over which the number of accelerations is counted
so a threshold would be a certain number of accelerations in a certain period of time, above which PA is classed as MVPA for example
What are the reasons for using a higher sampling frequency
more sensitive at picking up the sporadic activity of children
easier to differentiate between moderate and intensity activity