March 19 - Biostats/epidemiology Flashcards

1
Q

Clinical meaning of high sensitivity and high specificity

A

High sensitivity means a negative test is good for ruling out diagnosis

High specificity means a positive test is good for ruling in a diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Attack rate formula

A

number who become ill / number at risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Negative and positive skey

A

Neg skew: large values predominante in data set (tail at neg end of curve). Mean less than median less than mode

Pos skew: small numbers predominate in data set (tail at pos end of curve). Mode less than median less than mean)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Power and beta

A

Power = 1-beta = ability to detect a difference when it exists

beta=probabiliy of comitting a tyep II error (failure to reject null)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Relative risk ratio

A

=risk in exposed/risk in unexposed = a/(a+b) / c/(c+d)

Can’t be used in case control, except for rare diseases where OR equals RR. Prevalence less than 10%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Odds ratio

A

Used in case control studies. OR=disease in exp/disease in unexp // no disease in exp/no disease in unexp

=a/c / b/d

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Attributable risk and attributable risk percent

A

attributable risk =risk in exposed - risk in unexposed
attributable risk %=RR-1 / RR = (risk in exposed - risk in unexposed)/risk in exposed = percent of disease explained by the risk factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Number needed to harm

A

1/attributable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Secondary vs tertiary prevention

A

Secondary=interrupting disease process before symptoms develop

Tertiary prevention=treating established condition to minimize progression/complications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ecological study

A

Looks at populations rather than individuals. Compares frequence of characteristic and outcome in different populations. Can’t be used to draw conclusions, only to make hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Relationship between confidence interval and p value

A

When 95% confidence interval does not contain null value (e.g. RR of 1), then p is less than 0.5 and result is statistically significant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Standard error

A

Std error = SD/sq rt (n)

As sample size increases, std error decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Calculation of confidence interval

A

95% confidence interval = mean +/- 1.96 x SE

where SE=SD/sq rt(n)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case control vs cross sectional study

A

Case control

  • takes those with and without disease and looks back at their exposures
  • caclulae exposure odds ratio

Cross sectional

  • takes those with and without exposure and looks at diseaese
  • calculate prevalence odds ratio
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hawthorne effect

A

Tendency to change behavior when know being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Berkson’s bias

A

Selection bias of using hospitalized patients as control grup

17
Q

Effect modificiation vs confounding

A

Effect modification: effect of exposure on outcome modified by another variable; shows difference between strata

Confounding: no difference between strata. Effect seen on whole due to, for example, those who drink more also smoking more contributing to false association between drinking and lung cancer

18
Q

Probability that at least one test result will be positive: formul

A

=1 - probability that all will be positive

true whenever have independent events

19
Q

Attrition bias

A

results from loss of subjects if they differ in their risk of developing the outcome than those that are retained. Form of selection bias