lesson 13: PATERNALISM AND TRUTH-TELLING Flashcards
The deliberate overriding of a patientās opportunity to
exercise autonomy because of a perceived obligation of
beneficence is called
paternalism
āInterventions intended to prevent or mitigate harm to or to benefit a person, despite the fact that the personās risky choices and actions are informed, voluntary, and autonomousā
It is classified as what type of paternalism
Hard Paternalism
to protect persons from their own non-voluntary conduct. People justify its acceptance when a person may be unable to make reasonable, autonomous decisions.
is classified as what type of paternalism?
Soft Paternalism
an individual decides on the basis of oneās best knowledge of what is good for another person
Personal Paternalism
decisions regardless of non-consenting patient
Personal Paternalism
control of an agency, or other governmental bodies over particular kinds of practices and procedures in Medicine
State Paternalism
examples of State Paternalism
LAWS AND REGULATION
ļ¼ Medical Practice
ļ¼ Restrictions Research
ļ¼ Licensing
ļ¼ Drugs
Issues in Medical Paternalism
-Lack of respect for patientās autonomy
- Failure to inform the patient of true diagnosis
- Failure to disclose other available and acceptable treatment
options
the act or an instance of justifying something
Justification
an acceptable reason for doing something
Justification
something that justifies an act or way of behaving
Justification
Justification for Personal Paternalism
ļ The recipient of the paternalistic act is sick and consults
the physician for medical advice
ļ The patient has some incapacity (nervous breakdown, minor or comatose) which prevents him from making decisions
ļ The probable benefit of paternal intervention outweighs the probable risk of harm form non interference
ļ Doctor has an obligation to act in the best interest of the patient
ļ The patient upon consulting the physician, voluntarily transfers part of his autonomy to the doctor
Justification for State Paternalism
Used to describe any situation in which the state intervenes in citizen activity within its jurisdiction to promote, modify, hinder or abolish that activity with the justification that such intervention is for the benefit of the individuals or groups or even the whole society
Approaches of truth telling:
ends importance to the patient as a person
person-centered
Approaches of truth telling:
stresses the nature of the problem, or the severity of the patientās illness
problem-oriented
Delineates our relationship with other persons, like
ourselves, other subjects.
I-IT
Delineates our relationship with other persons, like
ourselves, other subjects.
I-THOU
is one of the core duties of medical practice. It
requires health care providers to keep a patientās personal health
information private unless consent to release the information is
provided by the patient
Confidentiality
Protecting Confidential Information
Ensuring that you only disclose confidential information to
those who need to know.
You may break confidentiality when:
ļ¼ The information disclosed to you suggests that something
may happen or have happened that is not in the
organisationās interests.
ļ¼ If something has happened this is against your professional
code of conduct, or which you believe to be wrong.
ļ¼ There is a possibility that a criminal offence has been
committed.
ļ¼ If there is suspected child abuse or abuse of another
vulnerable person
Importance of Ethical Theories
ļ· Understanding ethical theory helps inform ethical decisionmaking.
ļ· Improves confidence and competence for making future ethical
decisions
ļ· Helps to understand how and why patients or colleagues may
not share the same moral outlook.
How do ethical theories relate to decision-making?
It represents the viewpoints from which individuals seek
guidance as they make decisions.
Why do we need to make ethical decisions and actions?
Ethical decisions generate and sustain trust; demonstrate
respect, responsibility, fairness and caring; and are
consistent with good citizenship. These behaviors provide
a foundation for making better decisions by setting the
ground rules for our behavior
Justifications of Truth-Telling
ļ Our human and moral quality as persons is taken away
from us if we are denied whatever knowledge is available
about our condition as patient
ļ As patients, we have entrusted to the physician any
knowledge he has about ourselves, so the facts are ours
and not his
ļ The highest conception of the physician-patient
relationship is a personalistic one which is based on
mutual confidence and respect for each otherās rights
ļ To deny a patient pertinent knowledge about himself,
especially in a life-and-death situation, is to deprive him
the ample time to prepare for his own death or to carry
out responsibilities that are based solely on his decisions
or actions
Challenges of Truth-telling
ļ· Patients being autonomous individuals
ļ· Conflict with other obligations
ļ· Increases of respect between physician and patient
ļ· Health professionals must be cautious of giving truthful
information