Lesson 11 Flashcards
Central route processing
Routes to Persuasion
persuasive message is evaluated by thoughtful consideration of the issues and arguments used.
Peripheral route processing
persuasive message is evaluated on the basis of irrelevant or extraneous factors ( who, how long, emotional appeal)
Cognitive Dissonance
mental conflict that occurs when a person hold two contradictory attitudes or thoughts. EX: “I smoke.”/ “Smoking leads to cancer.”
Modifying: “I really don’t smoke too often.” Changing importance: “ The evidence on this is weak.” Adding additional: “My regular exercise offsets the smoking effect.” Denying: “ There is no evidence linking smoking to cancer.”
Schemas
stored information in memory that can bias the way new information is processed and interpreted.
Self Schemas
beliefs and views about oneself
Event Schemas
recognition of typical ways in which a sequence of
action tends to unfold
Role Schemas
information on “appropriate” behavior based on
social categories: age, race, sex, occupation.
Person Schemas
understanding of individuals you know and/or
types of people.
Attribution theory
considers how we decide what the causes of a particular behavior is on the basis of samples of a person’s behavior.
Situational causes
external causes for a person’s behavior
Dispositional causes
internal causes (traits/personality) for a person’s behavior.
(she cut me off because she’s inconsiderate”
Halo Effect
an initial understanding of a person’s positive or negative traits is used to assume other positive or negative traits.
“She is not very punctual, so she must be lazy and unorganized as well.”
Assumed-similarity bias
tendency to think of people as being similar to oneself even when meeting them for the first time.
(assuming others see the world just as you do)
Self-serving bias
tendency to attribute positive outcomes to personal factors/traits and negative outcomes to external factors.
“ I got an A on the exam because I am smart” VS “ I got an F on the exam because the teacher is unfair.”
Fundamental Attribution error
tendency to overestimate other people’s behavior to dispositional causes and minimize the importance of situational causes.
“He must not have held the door open for me because he is a rude person.”