Leicester Course Mock Flashcards
- Concerning properties of x-rays:
Beam intensity is the total energy per unit area per unit time. True.
True.
Beam intensity refers to the amount of energy the x-ray beam carries per unit area per unit time. It is typically measured in units like milliampere-seconds (mAs), which reflects the amount of energy produced by the x-ray tube. Intensity is related to both the number of photons and the energy of those photons.
The inverse square law applies to all x-ray exposures.
False. only point source in a vacuum
X-rays have lower linear energy transfer than alpha particles
X-rays are a form of high-energy electromagnetic radiation and generally have low linear energy transfer (LET) compared to particles like alpha particles, which are charged and have much higher LET.
All electromagnetic radiation can cause ionization
FALSE.
Ionizing radiation includes x-rays, gamma rays, and ultraviolet (UV) radiation with enough energy to ionize atoms (i.e., knock electrons out of atoms).
At equivalent energy, an x-ray cannot be distinguished from a gamma ray
True.
X-rays and gamma rays are both forms of electromagnetic radiation and, at the same energy level, they are indistinguishable. The distinction between x-rays and gamma rays lies in their origin:
X-rays are typically produced by the interaction of electrons with matter (such as in an x-ray tube).
Gamma rays are produced by nuclear processes or radioactive decay.
- Regarding the anode angle:
Is the angle that the target face makes with the x-ray beam. TRUE.
Is the only factor determining focal spot size. FALSE.
While the anode angle is a significant factor in determining the focal spot size, it is not the only factor. The focal spot size is also influenced by other factors such as:
Electron beam size: The size of the electron beam striking the anode target also impacts the focal spot.
Anode material: The type of material used in the anode (e.g., tungsten) can affect the resolution and heat dissipation, which in turn can impact the focal spot.
Focus design: The geometry of the x-ray tube and the way the electron beam is focused on the anode also play a role.
Is generally 20-35 degrees DK 7-20.
FALSE.
The anode angle typically ranges from 7 to 20 degrees, depending on the type of x-ray tube and its application. A common range for medical x-ray tubes is 10 to 20 degrees, but it is not 20 to 35 degrees. A larger anode angle may provide a larger focal spot and reduce the tube’s heat load, while a smaller angle creates a smaller focal spot but increases heat concentration.
Increases the tube rating if the angle is reduced.
False.
The tube rating (or heat capacity of the tube) is actually reduced if the anode angle is reduced. When the anode angle is small, the effective focal spot becomes smaller, which means the heat concentration on the anode increases, reducing the ability of the tube to dissipate heat effectively. A smaller angle leads to a higher heat load on the anode, potentially causing damage. Therefore, reducing the angle does not increase the tube’s rating; it typically decreases the thermal capacity.
The anode heel effect is greater if the angle is reduced (made more steaper).
True.
The anode heel effect refers to the variation in x-ray beam intensity across the field, with a higher intensity near the cathode side of the tube and a lower intensity near the anode side. This effect is more pronounced when the anode angle is reduced. A smaller anode angle causes the x-rays to be emitted more tangentially, increasing the gradient of intensity from the cathode to the anode side. In other words, the anode heel effect is more significant at smaller angles
- Radiation output from an x-ray tube increases with:
The addition of a filter
False.
The addition of a filter to the x-ray beam does not increase the radiation output. In fact, filters are used to remove low-energy, non-diagnostic x-rays (soft x-rays) from the beam. While this increases the beam quality by reducing the patient dose (as soft x-rays are less penetrating), it does not increase the total radiation output. In other words, filtering the beam may reduce the total number of x-rays hitting the patient but increases the average energy (beam quality).
Increasing kV (with all other factors kept constant)
True.
Increasing the kilovolt (kV) applied to the x-ray tube increases the energy of the x-rays produced. This increases both the penetrating power of the x-rays and the quantity of x-rays generated. Higher kV results in more efficient production of x-rays, leading to an increase in radiation output. Higher kV also increases the speed of electrons in the tube, leading to more interactions with the anode target and a higher overall x-ray yield.
Increasing mA (with all other factors kept constant)
True.
Milliamperes (mA) refers to the current applied to the x-ray tube, which controls the number of electrons flowing from the cathode to the anode. Increasing the mA increases the number of electrons striking the anode, thus increasing the quantity of x-rays produced. This directly increases the radiation output. Since mA determines the quantity (not the energy) of the x-rays, it is a key factor in controlling the intensity of the x-ray beam.
Decreasing cathode to anode distance
False.
Decreasing the cathode to anode distance would theoretically concentrate the x-rays in a smaller area, but it does not increase the overall radiation output. In fact, it would typically increase the beam divergence, leading to a reduction in intensity and potentially compromising image quality. The inverse square law also applies here: as the distance between the cathode and anode decreases, the intensity would increase in a localized area but not necessarily result in an overall increase in radiation output. The radiation output primarily depends on factors like mA, kV, and target material.
A single phase waveform
False.
A single-phase waveform produces less efficient radiation output compared to three-phase or high-frequency waveforms. In a single-phase system, the voltage fluctuates between zero and the peak value, which means the x-ray tube does not operate at full potential all the time, resulting in a lower average radiation output. In contrast, three-phase or high-frequency waveforms provide a more consistent and higher average voltage, leading to higher radiation output.
- Characteristic radiation
is produced when an electron interacts with the coulomb field of the nucleus. FALSE.
Characteristic radiation is actually produced when an electron interacts with the inner-shell electrons of the target atom (typically in the K-shell or L-shell), not with the Coulomb field of the nucleus itself. When an electron from the tube strikes an atom, it can eject an inner-shell electron, creating a vacancy. An electron from a higher energy level then falls into the vacancy, releasing energy in the form of characteristic radiation. The process involves interactions with electrons in the atom, not with the nucleus.
can be produced in an x-ray tube
True.
Characteristic radiation is indeed produced in an x-ray tube when high-energy electrons (from the cathode) strike the target material (usually tungsten). These electrons can dislodge inner-shell electrons from atoms in the target material, and as higher-energy electrons drop down to fill these vacancies, characteristic x-rays are emitted. The energy of the emitted x-rays is characteristic of the target material and the difference in energy between the two electron shells involved.
is always produced in a photoelectric interaction
False.
The photoelectric effect is a different type of interaction where an x-ray photon is completely absorbed by an atom, ejecting an inner-shell electron. Characteristic radiation can be produced as a secondary effect, but it is not always the result of a photoelectric interaction. In the photoelectric effect, the ejected electron leaves a vacancy, which may later be filled by an electron from a higher energy level, emitting characteristic radiation. However, the photoelectric interaction itself does not always result in characteristic radiation.
has energies that depends on NUCLEAR binding energy of the target material
False.
The energy of characteristic radiation depends on the binding energy of the electron shells of the target material, not the nuclear binding energy. Specifically, it depends on the difference in energy between the inner-shell electrons (e.g., K-shell, L-shell) and the higher-energy electron shells (e.g., L-shell, M-shell) in the target atom. These binding energies are specific to each element, but they are related to the electron shell energies, not the nuclear forces.
Definition: The nuclear binding energy is the energy required to hold the nucleus of an atom together. It is the energy needed to break up a nucleus into its individual protons and neutrons.
Nature of Energy: This energy is a result of the strong nuclear force that binds the protons and neutrons together inside the nucleus. It is typically on the order of MeV (million electron volts).
has energies that depend upon the kVp
False.
The energy of characteristic radiation is not directly dependent on the kVp (kilovolt peak) setting of the x-ray machine. The energy of characteristic radiation is determined by the difference in energy between the inner and outer electron shells in the target material. However, kVp influences the quantity and quality of the overall x-ray beam, and higher kVp can increase the likelihood of producing characteristic radiation by increasing the energy of electrons striking the target. But the specific energies of the characteristic x-rays themselves remain fixed by the atomic structure of the target material.
- Regarding scattered radiation affecting the image in diagnostic radiology:
Compton scatter is an important process in diagnostic radiology.
True.
Compton scattering is one of the primary interactions of x-ray photons with matter, especially in diagnostic radiology. It occurs when an x-ray photon interacts with an outer-shell electron of an atom, resulting in the photon being scattered in a different direction and losing some of its energy. Compton scatter contributes to image noise and radiation dose to the patient, making it an important consideration in radiographic imaging.
has a longer wavelength than the primary radiation
True.
Scattered radiation (such as from Compton scattering) typically has a longer wavelength than the primary radiation. This is because during Compton scattering, the scattered photon loses energy, resulting in a lower energy (and therefore longer wavelength) photon compared to the primary incident x-ray photon. The amount of energy loss depends on the angle of scattering, with a greater loss occurring at larger scattering angles.
is increased by compressing thick parts of the patient
False.
Compressing thick parts of the patient actually reduces scatter radiation, rather than increasing it. When thicker body parts are compressed, the overall patient thickness is reduced, which decreases the volume of tissue that the x-ray beam passes through, and as a result, there is less scatter generated. Additionally, compression can help reduce motion blur and improve image quality.
is greater in the forward direction than backwards
True.
Compton scatter tends to be greater in the forward direction (in the direction of the incident x-ray beam) compared to the backward direction. This is because the scatter angle influences the energy loss of the scattered photon: photons scattered at smaller angles (forward scatter) retain more energy than those scattered at larger angles (backward scatter). Therefore, forward scatter contributes more to the overall scattered radiation compared to backward scatter.
is independent of atomic number
True.
Compton scattering is independent of the atomic number (Z) of the material through which the x-rays are passing. Unlike photoelectric absorption, which is strongly dependent on the atomic number of the tissue (higher Z materials like bone interact more with x-rays), Compton scattering mainly depends on the electron density of the tissue, which is relatively similar across different materials in the body. Therefore, it does not significantly vary with the atomic number.
- An adequately filtered diagnostic x-ray beam:
reduces the relative amount of scatter reaching the film
False.
While beam filtration (typically through the use of aluminum filters) does remove low-energy x-rays from the x-ray beam (which are less penetrating), it does not directly reduce the amount of scatter reaching the film. Scatter radiation is produced primarily through interactions like Compton scattering in the body, and its reduction depends more on factors like beam collimation, patient positioning, and the use of grid devices rather than filtration alone.
can be produced by placing approx. 2mm of Aluminium in the beam
True.
Aluminum filtration is typically used to filter out low-energy x-rays from the x-ray beam. 2mm of aluminum is a common standard for adequate filtration in diagnostic radiology. This amount of aluminum can reduce the patient dose by removing low-energy x-rays that do not contribute to the diagnostic quality of the image but do contribute to unnecessary patient exposure.
increases the half value layer value, as compared with the unfiltered beam
True.
Half-value layer (HVL) refers to the thickness of a material (typically aluminum) required to reduce the intensity of the x-ray beam by half. Filtered x-ray beams have higher HVL values compared to unfiltered beams because the filtration process removes the lower energy, less penetrating x-rays, leaving a beam with higher energy and greater penetrating power. As a result, the HVL for a filtered beam is higher, indicating greater beam quality (penetration).
produces only marginally-smaller skin doses than an unfiltered beam
False.
Adequate filtration significantly reduces the skin dose by removing low-energy x-rays that would be absorbed by the skin. These low-energy photons contribute little to the image but significantly increase the dose to the skin. Therefore, filtration results in a substantial reduction in skin dose, not just a marginal one.
relies on an inverse cube relation between photo electric attenuation and photon energy
False.
The statement is not accurate in describing how photoelectric attenuation relates to photon energy. Photoelectric absorption is more directly related to the inverse square of the photon energy (or more specifically, the cube of the photon energy in some contexts) in its interaction with matter, but this is not the basis for how filtration works in diagnostic radiology. Filtration removes low-energy photons to improve beam quality, and the attenuation characteristics of the beam depend more on the material properties of the filter and the photon energy, not on an inverse cube relation.
- Photoelectric interactions between radiation and biological tissues
result in ionization
True.
Photoelectric interactions occur when an x-ray photon is completely absorbed by an atom, ejecting an inner-shell electron (often from the K-shell or L-shell). This ejected electron is called a photoelectron, and it leaves a vacancy in the atom’s electron shell, which can lead to ionization of the atom. Therefore, photoelectric interactions result in ionization of the atom from which the electron was ejected.
produce a deflected incident photon
False.
Photoelectric interactions involve the complete absorption of the incident photon, so there is no deflected photon as part of this interaction. This is in contrast to Compton scattering, where the incident photon is only partially absorbed and scattered in a different direction. In the photoelectric effect, the incident photon is entirely absorbed by the atom, leaving no scattered photon behind.
increase in probability of occurrence as the electron binding energy increases
True.
The probability of photoelectric interaction increases as the binding energy of the electron increases. In other words, atoms with higher atomic numbers (Z) have more tightly bound inner electrons. These tightly bound electrons are more likely to participate in photoelectric interactions, which is why photoelectric absorption is more common in high-Z materials (e.g., bone, iodine). High electron binding energy increases the likelihood of the photon being absorbed rather than scattered.
decrease in proportion to the fourth power of the incident photons energy .
FALSE. CUBED.
result in increased absorption at energies immediately below the electrons binding energy
- Subject contrast
- Depends on the focal spot size
False.
Subject contrast is primarily determined by the tissues being imaged, the energy of the x-ray beam, and the thickness of the body part. The focal spot size does not directly affect the subject contrast, though it can influence the image sharpness (spatial resolution). A smaller focal spot improves image sharpness, but it does not directly alter the contrast of the subject being imaged. - Depends on the kVp
True.
Subject contrast is indeed influenced by the kilovolt peak (kVp). The kVp controls the energy of the x-ray photons. A higher kVp increases the penetration power of the x-ray beam, leading to lower subject contrast, because higher energy x-rays pass through tissues more easily and produce less differential attenuation between tissues. Conversely, a lower kVp results in a greater difference in attenuation between tissues, increasing subject contrast. - Depends on the mAs
False.
The milliamperage-seconds (mAs) affects the radiographic density (or exposure) but does not directly impact the subject contrast. mAs controls the quantity of x-rays produced, which influences the overall image brightness or darkness but not the contrast between different tissues. The subject contrast is more dependent on factors like tissue composition, beam energy (kVp), and thickness of the subject. - Varies linearly with patient thickness
False.
Subject contrast does not vary linearly with patient thickness. As the thickness of the patient increases, beam attenuation increases, and there can be more scattering and loss of contrast due to the additional tissue the x-rays must pass through. However, this effect is not linear; instead, subject contrast typically decreases as the patient thickness increases due to increased scattering and absorption. - Is independent of the film’s gamma
False.
The film’s gamma (or film contrast) is an important factor in determining the overall image contrast, and it is related to how the film responds to the exposure. Subject contrast and film contrast both contribute to the overall radiographic contrast. If the film has low gamma (low contrast), it will not show the differences in tissue attenuation well, even if the subject contrast is high. Conversely, a film with high gamma (high contrast) can enhance the subject contrast, making tissue differences more visible.
- Geometric unsharpness is reduced by using
Geometric Unsharpness Ug = f x b / a
f = x-ray focal spot size
b = OBJECT - DETECTOR distance
a = SOURCE - OBJECT distance
https://www.radiologycafe.com/frcr-physics-notes/x-ray-imaging/image-quality/
A smaller object film distance = b
True. Object being closer to detector reduces geometric unsharpness
A shorter exposure time
False. Not part of the equation.
A larger focus film distance.
FALSE.
Increasing SOURCE TO IMAGE distance INCREASES BOTH MAGNIFICATION and GEOMETRIC BLURRING.
An increased target angle technically.
FALSE.
LARGER anode angle = LARGER focal spot size = f
This will increase geometric unsharpness
A grid
False. No effect.
In mammography
for an average breast a molybdenum anode is the anode of choice True.
- For an average breast, a molybdenum anode is the anode of choice
True.
Molybdenum is commonly used as the anode material in mammography because it provides a low-energy x-ray spectrum, which is ideal for imaging the soft tissues of the breast. This energy range helps to highlight differences in tissue densities without over-penetrating the breast tissue. It also reduces the radiation dose compared to other materials like tungsten. - A 3mm thick molybdenum filter is usually used
False.
The typical filter used in mammography with molybdenum anodes is much thinner—around 0.03 mm (30-60 micrometers). This thin filter helps to remove lower-energy x-rays from the beam, which would otherwise increase patient dose without contributing to image quality. The filter ensures that the x-ray beam has a more appropriate energy range for optimal imaging of breast tissue. - A small focal spot improves geometric resolution but increases exposure times
True.
A small focal spot improves geometric resolution (or sharpness) because it reduces the size of the x-ray beam’s focus, resulting in less geometric unsharpness. However, a smaller focal spot also increases the heat concentration at the target and requires longer exposure times to produce adequate image density because it produces less x-ray output. This is why mammography typically uses a small focal spot for high-resolution images despite the trade-off in exposure time.
- The typical skin dose is in the region of 50mGy
False.
The typical skin dose in mammography is generally much lower than 50mGy. In fact, the typical skin dose is usually in the range of 1-2 mGy per view. A dose of 50mGy would be considered excessively high and far beyond the typical exposure range for mammography. Low-dose imaging techniques are used to minimize radiation exposure to the skin and surrounding tissues. - An anti-scatter grid lowers the skin dose and improves film contrast
False.
Anti-scatter grids are used in mammography to reduce the amount of scatter radiation that reaches the film or detector, which helps to improve image contrast by preventing scattered radiation from degrading the image. However, grids also increase the radiation dose to the skin and tissues because they absorb some of the primary beam as well. Therefore, grids improve image quality but do not lower skin dose. In fact, they often result in a higher dose to the patient.
- In computed radiography
The x-ray absorbtion efficiency of the photostimulable phosphor plates (PSPs) is much higher compared to film screen
The latent image stored on a PSP can decay if not read promptly
The intrinsic resolution in CR is limited by the thickness of the phosphor layer
Spatial resolution of a standard CR system is significantly higher than that of a competing film screen combination
Quantum mottle is proportional to the square of photon fluence incident upon the image plate (N)
- True
- True. Over time, the latent image fades spontaneously by the process of phosphorescence
- False. Matrix size?
- False. A standard CR system generally has a significantly lower spatial resolution compared to a competing film-screen combination, meaning the film-screen combination can typically differentiate smaller details in an image than a standard CR system
- False?
- In digital radiography
The charged couple device (CCD) converts photons into an electronic signal
Resolution on a flat panel array is limited by the width of the detector elements
The efficiency of signal recording in a solid state DR detector is increased with increasing fill factor
DR detectors have a narrow latitude
The modulation transfer function (MTF) of indirect conversion detectors is better than that of direct conversion detectors
- True
- True. spatial resolution is determined not only by the size of the thin film transistor matrix per unit area, but also by the control technique of the scattered light
- True. In a solid-state digital radiography (DR) detector, a higher fill factor means a larger proportion of the detector’s area is actively sensing radiation, leading to a more efficient recording of the signal and improved image quality
- NO, digital radiography (DR) detectors have a wide exposure latitude, which is the range of exposure settings that can produce a diagnostic image
- The MTF of direct conversion detectors is considered better than that of indirect conversion detectors
- Dose in fluoroscopy
Automatic Brightness Control (ABC) is the same as Automatic Exposure Control (AEC)
The maximum entrance skin dose rate limit for a standard patient is 100mGy per minute
Patient entrance skin dose rate is reduced by increasing the thickness of a spectral filter
Entrance surface dose is increased by reducing the fluoroscopy pulse rate from 30 to 15 frames per second
Leakage from the tube housing is typically 5 uGy/hr at 1 m distance
A. True. Automatic Brightness Control (ABC) in fluoroscopy is essentially the same concept as Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) in radiography; both systems automatically adjust the radiation exposure to maintain a consistent image quality by adapting the kVp and mA based on the attenuation of the X-ray beam by the patient, with the key difference being that ABC is specifically used in fluoroscopy while AEC is used in standard radiography
B. True
C.
D.
E.
- Digital subtraction angiography
In DSA x-ray tubes with a lower rating can be used
Between the acquisition of the pre contrast and post contrast images the patient is allowed to move
A road map cannot be used in conjunction with live fluoroscopic images
Subtracted images have very high signal to noise ratio compared to non-subtracted images
Temporal frame averaging is used to decrease displayed image noise
A. True. In Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA), X-ray tubes with a lower rating can be used because the technique allows for significantly lower radiation doses to be used while still achieving high image quality
B. False
C. False
D. FALSE. Subtracted images generally have a lower signal-to-noise ratio compared to non-subtracted images, meaning they appear noisier due to the subtraction process eliminating not only unwanted tissue information but also some signal information, leading to a reduced signal-to-noise ratio
E. If frame averaging is used, the image is improved; and the more frames averaged, the better the results for noise decreases with the square root of the number of frames averaged. That is, if 16 frames are averaged, noise reduction would be a factor of 4.
- Absorbed dose
is a measure of energy absorbed per unit thickness
is measured in joules per kilogram T
is stated in Sieverts F
is stated in Grey T
can be estimated by an ionisation chamber T
A. False. A measure of energy absorbed per unit thickness is called the linear absorption coefficient