Lecture - Chapter 1 Flashcards
How did the paper “A scientist like me” investigate the issue of diversity in academia?
conducted a dempgraphic analysis by extracting hundreds of human names from common biology textbooks and assessing the binary gender and race of featured scientists
While most common scientists feaured in textbooks are white men, what positive findings were found in the study?
- BUT, women and scientists of colour are increasingly represented in contemporary scientific discoveries
- the proportion of women highlighted in textbooks has increased in lockstep with the proportion of women in the field (textbooks are matching demographics!)
What were some negative findings in the study?
- the scientists portrayed in textbooks are not representative of their target audience - the student population
- overall, very few scientists of colour were highlighted, and projections suggest it could take multiple centuries at current rates before we reach inclusive representation
Given the results of the study, textbook publishers are called upon to _
expand upon the scientists they hihghlight to reflect the diverse population of learners in biology
In times articles about the election that mentioned a political scientist starting from the day the first candidate was formally anounced until the first caucus of the season, they mentioned _ political scientists, _ of which were men
182 political scientists
80% were men
define an all-male panel
group of men (usually mostly white) on stage under the auspices of being the “experts” in their fields (even women’s repro rights and breastfeeding)
Who began collecting images of all male panels in facebook, which later merged into the ALL MALE PANELS tumblr?
Dr. Saara Sarma
- researcher in international relations at the University of Tampere in Finland
*added a photo of David Hasselhoff to each post XD
In the study “gender-balanced teams do better work,” what did the researchers look at?
- reviewed 6.6 million biomedical science publications from 2000 to 2019
- used an algorithm to document the author’s genders from their names
What was each paper evaluated on (Gender Balanced Teams do Better work?
- the researchers evaluated the influence & originality of each paper upon its publication
- influence was gauged by the number of citations the paper received
- a paper was considered highly influential if it fell within the top 5% of citations for that particular year
How did the researchers measure novelty?
examined the citations each paper contained
- ex. looking to see if there are any novel combinations in citations used
*novel combinations suggest knowledge advancement
What was found in relation to novelty and impact of research and gender-balanced teams?
mixed gender teams significantly outperformed not mixed in novelty score and impact
A mixed-gender team of 6 or more researchers was _ more likely to produce a novel paper and _ more highly to produce a highly cited paper than a same-gender team of the same size
9.1%, 14.6%
*and gender balanced teams (ex. 3 men 3 women) were more likely to produce novel and highly cited research than 4 men and 2 women
how did Watson shape modern psychology?
- believed our learning is connected to environment
- the interactionshapes who we come, and plays an important part in developing who we are career-wise
*give me a dozen healthy infants and I’ll train him to be anything
how did skinner shape modern psychology?
believed behaviour is shaped by reinforcement (postive/negative) or punishment
How did thorndike shape modern psychology?
- solidified that current consequences have impact on future behaviour
- law of effect: behaviours followed by positive outcomes are more likelyto be repeated, while those followed by negative outcomesare less likely to recur
*similar so skinner’s thoughts