lecture 8 Flashcards

1
Q

Feeling “holier than thou”

A

People believe
they are more moral, kind, and altruistic than
the average person

  • Better-than-average effect when it comes to
    morality
  • Maybe because of cognitive biases?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Feeling holier than thou (seeing self as superior) could be because of

A
  • overly charitable views of self (and accurate views of their others)?
  • overly cynical views of others?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

“daffodil days study 1

A

What is the source of bias for feeling holier-than-thou?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

method study 1

A

5 weeks before charity event: * “Will you buy at least one daffodil and, if so, how many?”
* “Will a peer buy at least one daffodil?”
* 3 days after event:
* “How many did you buy?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does study 1 suggest

A

that feeling “holier than thou” is due to errors in judgement about self, not in judgements about others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Across 4 studies, people overestimate likelihood that they would choose the kinder action by an average of

A

32% (but only by 4% for
others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does the cogntiive bias in self perception mean

A
  • Means that seeing self as uniquely kind is due to having overly favourable views of self and not due to being overly cynical about others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

types of information on which to base predictions of future behaviour

A

case-based and distributional/ base-rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

case based

A

evidence relevant to the specific case or person under consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

distributional/ base rate

A

evidence about the distribution of behaviour in similar or past situtations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

people are good at estimating

A

the distribution of social behaviour in various domains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

base rate fallacy

A

we tend to assign greater value to to case-based info and often ignore distributional info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

when we make predictions about our own behaviours we use

A

case based info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when we male predictions about average persons behaviour we use

A

base-rate info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Idea of “average person” is vague and abstract

A

so no case-based info is available,
and therefore we have to rely on distributional info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

base rate fallacies in self perceptions?

A

do we use case-based info to predict own behaviour and base rate info to predict others behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

study 2 method

A

Participants received $5.00 for participating in study

  • Received info about 3 charities
  • Told that future participants will have a chance of donating any or all of their study
    compensation to one of them
  • If in this situation, how much would you and average peer donate?
  • Then, learned about ACTUAL donations of 3, 7, then 13 people from
    earlier study and allowed to revise prediction after each new piece of
    info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what does the study 2 show

A

evidence of base-rate fallacies in self-perceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

base rate info proved

A

accuracy of predictions o peers behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what did base rate info not improve

A

accuracy of predictions for own behaviour

hung on to case-based info and rejected base-rate info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

this doesnt rule out

A

self-enhancement motivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

using case-based info to judge a specific other

A

Does presence of any case-based info prompt ignoring of distributional info?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

method study 3

A

Repeated method of previous study but added third
prediction
* Participants read a peer’s self-description
* How much would you donate?
* How much would average peer donate?
* How much would this specific peer donate?

24
Q

results of study 3

A

People ignored base-rate info for self AND for specific peer

Feeling holier than thou (better-than-average) not necessarily due to selfenhancement motivation, but base-rate fallacy

25
Q

information processing biases can lead to

A

overly pos self views

26
Q

we use case-based infor ot male

A

judgements about the self

27
Q

Some better-than-average studies show that

A

there are some domains
where people tend to rate themselves as worse than others

28
Q

what are the domains where people rate themselves as worse than others

A
  • Concentration
  • Artistic ability
  • Acting ability
  • Mechanical ability
29
Q

hypothesis for anchoring bias

A

responsible for the better-than-average and worse-than-average effects

30
Q

common human tendency to rely too heavily on .. when making a decision

A

the first piece of information that comes to mind

31
Q

what does the anchoring bias mean

A

judgements will be biased towards anchor/info that we can easily retrieve

32
Q

when comparing self and others

A

we first think about our own abilities because they come to us automatically and effortlessly

33
Q

only think about others ability after

A

effortful and thus we insufficiently take this info into account

34
Q

causes our judgements of ourselves to be biased by

A

towards how we perceive our own ability in a given domain

35
Q

anchoring bias hypothesis

A

responsible for the better-than-average and worse-than-average effects

36
Q

peoples own skills serve as … but we fail to consider…

A

an anchor the skills of others

37
Q

better than average effect in domains are

A

easy for most people

38
Q

worse-than-average effect in domain that are

A

hard for most people

39
Q

Anchor to own experience of task feeling effortless

A

failing to take into account
that others may feel similarly

40
Q

Anchor to own experience of task feeling hard

A

failing to take into account that others may feel similarly

41
Q

study 2 better than average effect and difficulty

A

Experimentally manipulated participants perceptions of
their skills:
* Assessed “integrative ability” using bogus test
* Participants either got a hard or easy test

42
Q

outcomes of study 2

A

PARTICIPANTS RATED OWN ABILITY COMPARED WITH PEERS ABILITY

43
Q

predictions about study 2

A

Easy test: Participants will see own ability as above average

Difficult test: Participants will see own ability as below average

44
Q

Difficulty of test determined whether people saw themselves as

A

better-than or
worse-than average

45
Q

both motivational and cognitive processes result in

A

biased self views that may serve us well

46
Q

positive illusions are good

A

higher subjective well-being
higher achievement
more relationship satisfaction and commitment
coping with challenges

47
Q

positive illusions are bad

A

More boasting
Consequently, alienate others, which leads to loneliness in the long run

Set unrealistically high goals, leading to frequent failure and,
consequently, low well-being

Or, no reason to self-improve and, consequently, miss opportunities to
advance skills

48
Q

meta-analysis

A

200 studies with more than 10,000 participants

49
Q

positive illusions about self are good for

A

personal adjustment

higher subjective well-being and lower feelings of depression

50
Q

Positive illusions have mixed effects for relationships

A
  1. How long you know someone matters
    relationships
  2. Type of traits you self-enhance on matters
51
Q
  1. How long you know someone matters
A

Self-enhancement linked with more liking by strangers, but no association for longer-term relationships

52
Q
  1. Type of traits you self-enhance on matters
A

Self-enhancement on collectivistic traits were seen as more likeable/warm

Self-enhance on individualistic traits (independence, power, achievement) seen as more
competent but also less likeable/warm

53
Q

positive illusions are associated with people

A

feeling good about themselves

54
Q

when interacting with strangers

A

its helpful to come across as confident

matters less with people one knows

55
Q

if want to come across as likeable

A

enhance collectivistic traits

56
Q

if want to come across as competent

A

enhance individualistic traits