Lecture 5 - imaging the brain part 2 Flashcards

1
Q

EEG
Electrical potential
event-related potentials
components

A

-electrical potential = scalp recorded summation of PSP’s
quanitfied in 2 domains: time & frequency

-ERP = time locked activity. ( know whekn event happens, can detect what happens in EEG) NT binding.

  • exogenous: related to things happening outside the body = sensory ERP. physical characteristics of stimulator
  • endogenous = related to mental event.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Electrode Placement in EEG

A

10-20 system - standarized placement. 10/20% of midline distance from nasion (nose dip) to inion( back of head dip)
z= 0
odd = left
even = right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
beta wave 
alpha wave
delta wave
deep sleep
coma
A
  • excited, alert, aroused
  • relaxed, slow oscillation
  • sleep, but there are theta bursts involved too.
  • complex pattern in slow roll
    1 Hz, brainstem activity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

EEG - seizure.
onset
clipping
origin?

A
  • can see where onset is, vs where it travelled based on time until dramatic EEG recording.
  • clipping = flat tops on recording. means strength of voltage is stronger than range in eeg.
  • info can tell you where seizure may originate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ERP
-amplified?
- averaged
Nd ?

A
  • wave of brain activity during stimulus. signals amplified to be visualized. do task multiple times and average divided by stimuli to get solid wave.
    Nd = difference wave
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

contingent negative variation (CNV)

- walter, 1964.

A

warning followed by interval followed by imperative stimulus
- EEG change in response to paradigm. - warning that you might get task, brain prepared. CNV = difference btw prepare and do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

P300

- sutton 1965

A

oddball paradigm - low probability stimuli embedded in train of high probability stimuli.
- every time you hit the lower probability stimuli, p300 shows up. ~300 mV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

N1 attention affect - dichotic listening paradigm (DLP)

- hillyard 1973

A
  • covert attention = change attention without moving eyes. sound on same side as attention, N1 -ERP is larger.
    endogenous process of shifting attention withou overt sign.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evoked potential
brainstem evoked potentials
visual evoked potentials
ERP defined by:?

A

-EP:ERP
-non-cortical PSP
VEP = ERP in response to visual stimulus
- peak size, time to peak post-stimulus, , topography, paradigm (stimulus unique to paradigm), slope of onset.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

signal averaging

A

superimpose all signals. divide by number of superimposed signals. common is kept, deflections cancelled out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

filtering response

A

more repeats of trials = stabilize the response (average), filter out the endogenous actors and keep whats common to the task/stimuli.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

within subject
btw subject
signal averagin

A

within = after many sessions = more similarities
btw = each person has different ERP.
- average ERP usually doesnt look like anyone’s, but is average of all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

caveats to ERP reliability

- grand averages

A
  • large btw subject variability: diggerent brain., good within-subject reliability across sections
  • latency jitter:: amplitudes misleading: average is related to everyones but not same as anyone’s
  • less between session variability- sleep, drugs, hangover, diet.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ERP comparison to behaviour.

A

ERP elucidate specific cognitive processes underlying overt behaviour
- Stroop + P300. change in p300 = perceptual thing happens. if not, then no motor prep.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

online measure in absence of overt behaviour

A

cover attention change, look at what brain is going. note correct vs error in responses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

small amplitude = ERP =? # of trials compared to RT experiments

A

greater number of trials than RT experiments

17
Q

advantages of ERP

A

non-invasive
temporal resolution is decently good
cost - low.

18
Q

major ERP components

-visual sensory responses

A

-VSR: see difference when attending to same side, different when attending to opposite side.

19
Q

VSR
C1 - retinotopy & polarity
P1

A

C1: (80-130 ms)basic retinotopy = lower visual fiel maps to upper bank of calcarine fissure (V1 folded into this fissue. vice versa for upper visual field.

  • polarity can vary. stimuli in LVF give +C1,, -C1 in UVF
  • P1 100-130 mslateralized. early P1 - v2, later P1 = v4.
    sensitive to direction of spatial attention
20
Q

Auditory sensory responses
- BER
N1
Mismatch negativity (MMN)

A

brainstem evoked responses.
N1 = 70-150 msauditory cortex arousal - related to A1 processing. , vertex potential attention (at point Cz. related to attention), lateral potential -

MMN: 100-200msautomatic - novel stimuli elicit this. mapping enviro with auridoty info. orienting response always working. partt of endogenous activity.

21
Q

schizophrenics - MMN and Gray Matter Reduction.

A

look at schizophrenics. - increase (less negative) MMN over time = should be stable.
shrinkage in brain area in A1 - correlated with increase in MMN. = decreased symptoms.

22
Q

P300

A
  • solicited by oddball paradigm.
    Parietal P3b - sshows task is relevant. frontal P3a = novel processing
    “context updating” updating awareness - is it here? no. now? no.
    target probablity - lower prob = higher p300 peak
    resource allocation - split attention = less resource to task = smaller p300
    time latency - mask stimulus = longer for p300 to peak
23
Q

dipole modeling and inverse problem

caveat?

A

try to find part of brain that is sending outthe signal.
- map image of brain, pick area and dipole within that. then create the wave that would come from that. = see how it matches to real EEG. If different fin a new area.
combine with fMRI for best results.

Image= spherical model of brain. not exactly what patient loos like.
conductivity thru different tissue is different too.

24
Q

MEG

right hand rule

A

electric current = magnetic field.

use electrodes to detect magnetic field.
drawback: expensive
sensitive to other fields - interruption
dipole orientation - too deep in sulci, cant reach electrode

25
Q

TMS

A

magnetic field perpendicular to flow of electricity. targets brain to stimulate or virtually lesion

26
Q

fNIRS

A

measure oxygenated:deoxygenated.
different tissue absorb in different ways. electrode sends out signal which is picked up by other electrode. = cant go deep - limited spatial resolution.

27
Q

neuronal code

A

firing patterns of neurons

28
Q

well-learned behaviour + cortical activity

A

sparse cortical activity.

29
Q

coherence theory

A

relate brains single cell activity and eEG activity.
high coherence = both correlated. large, slow waves = brain is idling
low coherence = poorly correlated = processing information

30
Q

DBS

A

implanted electrodes.