Lecture 4: the role of groups in collective violence Flashcards
Intergroup threat theory
States that intergroup conflict is based on (perceived or real) threat. This can be:
- Realistic: objective threat.
- Symbolic: perceived threat (like threat to values and norms)
Study about realistic and symbolic threat among Muslims and Norwegians.
Symbolic threat, but not realistic threat, predicted:
- Non-Muslim Norwegians to join anti-Islam movements.
- Non-Muslim Americans willingness to persecute Muslims.
- Attitudes and behavioural intentions against the West among Swedish and Turkish muslims.
Crime as social control
Violence can be seen as a mechanism of social control. We are constantly trying to control each other to ensure that we can live together. Society needs lots of different steps of control and violence is a conflict resolution of this.
Conflict dimensions
Collective violence is more likely to occur when groups are more distant form each other on 2 dimensions:
1. Degree of social polarisation
2. Perceived continuity of the problem
This causes 4 forms of conflict:
- Vigilantism
- Lynching
- Rioting
- Terrorism
(1) Polarisation
- When polarisation is greater, this leads to collective liability, which leads to rioting and terrorism.
- When polarisation is lower, perceptual of individual liability can lead to lynching and vigilantism.
(2) Continuity of the violence
- When alleged offences are chronic or enduring, the violence is often highly organised, which causes vigilantism and terrorism.
- When alleged offences are infrequent or transitory, more informal violence arises like lynching and rioting.
4 types of violence
- Vigilantism: low polarisation and structural conflict (high continuity).
- Lynching: low polarisation and incidental conflict (low continuity).
- Terrorism: high polarisation and structural conflict (high continuity).
- Rioting: high polarisation and structural conflict (low continuity).
Study about practice of violence
Participation in violence requires overcoming considerable aversion/ hesitance. One of the 2 ways to do this is through practice. People had to practice violence in 2 conditions:
1. Practice killing 1 bug before starting.
2. Practice killing 5 bugs before starting
People who felt a connection to the bugs had the most benefit of the practice killings.
Social identity theory
Group membership forms your social identity. This can be from groups that you’re born into or that you choose. There are 2 components of social identity:
- Content of identity
- Strength of identification
Social identity connects people to their groups (psychologically) and whatever happens to the group starts to affect them personally. This also creates us-them thinking.
De-individuation theory
When we are in a group, we lose ourselves/ the ability to think for ourselves, because the groups creates a feeling of:
- Anonimity
- Diffusion of responsibility
- Conjugation (samenvoeging) of behaviour and ideas
In a crown, this brings out the tendency to commit violence.
Critique of the de-individuation theory
The theory states that violence is natural and easy, but this is and old-fashioned idea, because we are not wired to commit violence. De-individuation does happen, but this is not always a means of violence.