Article 3b: The Sources Of Leader Violence: A comparison of ideological and non-ideological leaders (Mumford et al., 2007) Flashcards
Design of the study
This study analysed 80 historically notable leaders (violent and non-violent) and looked at factors that might predispose leaders to violence (individual, organisational and environmental factors).
Different types of leaders
Prominent leaders, of any type, emerge in response to a crisis:
- Ideological leaders: respond trough crisis by creating a vision of the future that is based on shared social values.
- Charismatic leaders: attempt to resolve the crisis through creating a vision of a positive image of the future that will induce collection action.
- Pragmatic leaders: apply a sense-making strategy based on analysis and manipulation of the thing that caused the current problem.
Ideological leaders differ from charismatic leaders in terms of:
- Just-world commitment
- Ideological extremism
- Oppositional bonding
- Impositions of interpretive structures
- Value-based control
- Social disruption
Main results
Attributes of ideological leaders (extremism, righteousness etc.) influence the amount of violence and the occurrence of violence (for institutional and cultural violence).
Why ideological leaders contribute to more violence
- Leader extremism: ideological leaders tend to exhibit more extreme views than non-ideological leaders.
- Group righteousness: ideological groups often have a strong sense of righteousness, which can justify violence.
- Organisational indoctrination: ideological groups are more likely to indoctrinate their members, reinforcing the group’s beliefs and justifying violence.
- Environmental conflict and disruption: ideological leaders are more likely to emerge in an environment with conflict and disruption, which can contribute to violence.
Selective information processing (of violent leaders)
Violent leaders often exhibit biassed, self-serving appraisal, projecting negative intentions onto others. This mechanism includes traits like entitlement, low openness and information distrust.
Things that promote violence
- Group insularity: isolated groups tend to be more vulnerable to violent leaders and more willing to act under their leadership.
- Institutional sanctioning: organisational approval of violence encourages destructive behaviour.
- Environmental corruption: corrupt environments foster violent leaders.