Lecture 4: Cognitive Development 1 Flashcards
clinical method
a technique in which Piaget asks the child questions in order to find out about their thinking patterns
- first question is the same for every child, but the adjusted based on the child’s answers
schemas
schemas are mental structures that help individuals organize and interpret information. they are frameworks that allow us to take shortcuts in interpreting the vast amount of information available in our environment.
- a set of rules that can be generalized to different situations
- children acquire knowledge by creating schemas (nurture), based on 2 innate intellectual functions (nature): organization and adaptation
organization
children learn to combine existing schemas to make them more compex
adaptation
the process of adjusting to the demands of the environment
- based on 2 other processes: assimilation and accommodation
assimilation
the process of incorporating new information into existing schemas without changing the schema itself. It involves interpreting new experiences in terms of our current understanding.
- as a result, we deal with our environment in our own way, making new information fit into our existing categories
accommodation
the process of modifying existing schemas or creating new ones in response to new information that doesn’t fit into existing schemas. this allows for a more accurate understanding of new experiences
disequilibrium
when a new experience challenges your schema, you experience a cognitive conflict
equilibrium
achieving a mental stability in which internal thoughts are consistent with what we see before us
Piaget underestimated the cognitive capacities of young children
if researchers make the tasks more familiar to children and somewhat simplify them, they will be able to perform them
- Piaget made no distinction between competence (understanding a concept) and performance (passing a test)
- when a child did not complete a task, Piaget thought competence was lacking
Piaget is wrong in stating that broad developmental stages exist
according to Piaget, there is a different form of thinking at each developmental stage, however people are inconsistent in their performance and do not show the same level of thinking in every area
- in addition, transitions between phases are often subtle and long, contrary to what Piaget said
Piaget did not explain development
according to critics, Piaget mainly described development and did not explain it
- contemporary researchers want more answers about how changes in the brain and experiences can contribute to cognitive development
Piaget paid little attention to social influences
Piaget paid little attention to social interactions and cultural differences
- children also develop throughout interactions with their parents, peers, family members, teachers, and so on
Piaget’s constructivism
implies that children actively create their own understanding of the world, based on their experiences
neuroconstructivism
new knowledge is gained through changes in the neural structures of the brain in response to experience
Vygotsky’s sociocultural perspective
stated that cognitive growth takes place within a sociocultural context and grows through the child’s social interactions
zone of proximal development
there is a gap between what a child can do independently and what a child can do with help from a parent
guided participation
children actively contribute to culturally relevant activities where they are guided by their parents
- similar to ‘scaffolding’
scaffolding
parents give structured help to their children and gradually reduce this help as the child becomes more competent
private speech (talking out loud to yourself)
contributes to the development of young childrens thoughts
criticism of Vygotsky’s work
too much emphasis on social interactions and too little on the individual development of knowledge
Piaget’s sensory-motor phase