*****Lecture 3 - Attributoin and social knowledge Flashcards

1
Q

Define attribution

A

Process of assigning a cause to our own behaviour and that of others. Searching for causal explanations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline Fritz Heider’s concept of the Naive psychologist

A
  • People search for causal explanations of events/ behaviouris in life.
  • We look for stable and enduring properties of the world around us
  • Try to make causal explanations on the meaning of life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two types of attributions?

A
  • Internal attributions (dispositional) - its their fault

- External attributions (situational) - its societies fault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What theory did Jones & Davis (1965) propose?

A

Theory of correspondant inference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who proposed the Theory of correspondant inference?

A

Jones & Davis (1965)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

OUtline the Theory of correspondant inference

A
  • How people infer that a persons behaviour is correspondant to an underlying disposition
  • Basically the process of how we assume a behaviour is due to the individuals personality
  • We do this by looking at some characteristics
  • 1) The act was freely chosen
  • 2) The act was not expected
  • 3) The act wasnt socially desirable
  • 4) The act had direct impact on us (hedonic relevance)
  • 5) The act seemed intended to affect us (personalism)
  • 6) The act reflects some true characteristic of the person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Jones & Harris (1967) do?

A

Castro Speeches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who did the Castro Speeches

A

Jones & Harris (1967)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outline Jones & Harris (1967)

A

P’s either could choose to write a pro-castro or anti castro speech OR didnt have a choice. If it was freely chosen, the speaker was attributed a pro or anti-castro attitude respectively. But even for those who didnt have a choice, they were still attributed the attitude. This the FUNDAMENTAL ATTRIBUTION ERROR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What model did Kelley (1967, 73) do?

A

Covariation Model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define what the covariation model describes:

A

The tendency to assign the cause of behaviour to the factor that covaries most closely with it. We use it to decide whether to attribute a behaviour to internal dispositions or external

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What 3 factors does the covariation model depend on?

A
  • Consistency (Behaviour y always co-occurs with X)
  • Distinctiveness (reaction occuring only with 1 stimulus or common reaction to many stimuli)
  • consensus - whether others react in the same way
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the limitations of Kelleys model?

A
  • X - requires multiple observations
  • X - we may have incomplete info - leading to errors
  • X - Causal schemata - expect certain things to cause certain behaviours
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who invented the two factor theory of emotion?

A

Schacter (1959) and Schachter and Singer (1962)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

BRiefly outline the 2 factor theory of emotion

A

Emotion = Physical arousal + Cognitive label

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline Schacter and SInger (1962)

A

P’s were injected with epinephrine or placebo. Participants were then either:
1) Informed of what they will feel
2) Not told what they will feel
3) misinformed - told incorrectly
They were then placed in either:
1) ROom with euphoric confederate
2) Filled in questionnaire with highly insulting and personal questions
The person looked to their environment to see how to act.

17
Q

What is meant by misattribution of arousal?

A

E.g falling in love on holiday, as soon as youre home and environment changes you no longer feel that way. Similarly when you are scared

18
Q

Who came up with the Self-Perception Theory?

A

Bem (1967,1972)

19
Q

Outline the Self-perception theory

A

We gain knowledge of ourselves only by making self attributions - infer our own attitudes from our own behaviour.

20
Q

Who came up with the internals and external attribution styles?

A

Rotter (1966)

21
Q

Outline the two attributional styles

A

internals - enourmous control over their destiny

Externals - no control, events occur by chance

22
Q

Who came up with Confirmation Bias?

A

Rosenhan (1973)

23
Q

Outline Rosenhan’s (1973) Confirmation Bias

A

Placing a label on someone sticks - negative description of people in groups always sticks

24
Q

Define Fundamental Attribution Error

A

Attributing other peoples behaviour more to internal rather than situational causes (Ross, 1977)

25
Q

What are the 4 explanations of the FAE

A
  • Focus of attention - focusing more on person not env
  • Differential forgetting - forgot about social context
  • Western societies - making internal attributions is socially valuble
  • Self-other effect (Jones + Nisbett 1972) - tendency to attribute others behaviour dispositionally, and our own internally
26
Q

Who invented the Self-other effect as an explanation for the FAE?

A

Jones + Nisbett (1972)

27
Q

Define the Ultimate Attribution error

A

Ignoring social context completely and blaming a group based on stereotypes

28
Q

What did Miller (1984) find?

A

THat by age of 15, Americans showed more dispositional in their attributions than indian hindus

29
Q

Define Self-handicapping

A

Making publicly advance external attributions for our anticipated failure/ poor performance (Bergus + Jones (1978))

30
Q

Outline Bergus + Jones (1978)

A
  • P’s were given either a solvable or unsolvable puzzle
  • before the next task given the choice of taking a drug that improves performance, or one that hinders
  • Those with the impossible possible chose the hindering one and vice versa