Lecture 10 - Social categorisation, social identity and intergroup relations Flashcards

1
Q

what is meant by categorisation>

A

Organise information into meaningful categories to make it easier for them to be understood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who did the lines labelled A and B study?

A

Tajfel and Wilkes (1963)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline Tajfel and Wilkes (1963)

A
  • Looking at perception
  • Studying social phenomena with non-social objects
    P’s were in one of 3 conditions:
    1) Lines randomly labeled A or B
    2) Shorter lines labeld A, all the longer ones were B
    3) No labels
  • Accentuation Principle:
  • Categorisation of stimuli leads to perceptual accentuation of intra-category similiarities (seeing all ‘A’ lines as similar, and all ‘B’ lines as similar.
  • As well as inter-category differences on salient dimensions, seeing A and B lines as very different, even the last line of A (which is actually really close to B)
  • If there was no categorisation (i.e. condition 1) ther was no effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define the accentuation principle

A
  • Categorisation of stimuli leads to perceptual accentuation of intra-category similiarities (seeing all ‘A’ lines as similar, and all ‘B’ lines as similar.
  • As well as inter-category differences on salient dimensions, seeing A and B lines as very different, even the last line of A (which is actually really close to B)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who did the paitings study?

A

Tajfel et al., 1971

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline Tajfel et al., 1971

A

Looking at the minimum conditions needed to produce in-group and out group

  • Organised school boys into groups based on which paiting they liked.
  • Told they were in a group with others who agreed, were aware there was an opposite group, made up of those who disagreed
  • They were then asked to allocate points to in-group and out-group
  • The p’s gave in-group more points, and minimised outgroup points
  • They showed ‘in-group favouritism’ – maximising in group profit and outgroup difference
  • Showed that mere categorisatoin can lead to discrimination
  • Once you are in a social group, you believe you are the same to those in the ingroup, and different to those in the outgroup
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who did the study where two colleges had to form impressions of each other?

A

Wilder (1984)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline Wilder (1984)

A
  • Asked 2 colleges to make impressions of each other
  • Impression depended on whether contact was pleasant/ unpleaseant and if the target was a typical member of the other college
  • The pleasnt/ typical condition was most effective in creating a positive impression
  • We tend to categorise others as relevant ingroup/ outgroup prototypes
  • We tend to view people as members
    of a group, not as idiosyncratic
    individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define ethnocentrism in terms of social categorisation and groups

A

“a view of things in which ones own group is the centre of everything, and all others are scaled and rated with reference to it” (Sumner, 1906) – see their group as the cleverest, richest and happiest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who did the Summer camp study? Looking at intergroup conflict and cooperation

A

Sherif et al., 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline Sherif et al., 1961

A

P’s were middle class 5th graders at summer campes
- he allowed them to form friendships
- then he experimentally produced 2 groups, splitting up friendships
- These were the Bulldogs vs Red Devils
- he made sure friends were divided
Step 1: Experimental production of in-groups with a hierachical structure and set of norms (intra-group relations)
Step 2: Bringing the two experimentally formed groups into competition (intergroup tensio – very competitive)
- The Bulldogs won as they were closer to their leader, and werent highly stratified like the Red Devils
- Had to stop it though because it became too aggressive and too much rivalry
Step 3: Introduction of superordinate goals (reduction of intergroup tension)
- Wanted to see if the 2 groups could actually work together
- There was a car that was bringing an outdoor cinema, but it got stuck in the mud
- The two groups worked together to get it out so they could watch a film. They cooporated together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who invented the term ‘stereotypes’?

A

Lippman (1922)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define stereotypes according to Lippman (1922)

A
  • “Pictures in our heads”
    • Images of others
      Necessary mode of processing information, an inescapabale way of creating order out of the “great blooming, buzzing confusion of the outer world” (Lippmann, 1922, p. 81)
      ”relatively mundane inhabitants of our mental world… shortcuts the mind uses to simplify and understand the social world” (Locke & Johnston, 2001) – Condensed images/ descriptions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who did the study looking at racial stereotypes of 100 college students?

A

Katz and Braly (1933)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline Katz and Braly (1933)

A

Looked at the common words used to describe ehtnic minorities:

  • British most common word was Sportsmanlike (53%) - very positive
  • Black people - most common was superstious (84%) very negative
  • turkish - cruel 47% - again quite negative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What type of prejudice did Katz and Braly (1933) argue their study showed?

A

irrational prejudice -

  • These judgments cannot have been based on first hand experience (none of the respondants have never met a turk)
  • The leve of agreement was too great to have occurred by chance
17
Q

Who did the study about stereotypes of northern and southern european nations?

A

Linssen and Hagendoorn (1994)

18
Q

Outline Linssen and Hagendoorn (1994)

A

Looked at students stereotypes of northern and southern european nations (Denmark, England, Holland, Belgium, Germany, france, italy)
Found that stereotypes tended to be clustered and organised into northern and southern nations
Based of personal experience, historical events, the media

  • Dominant nations = proud, assertive, aggressive (britan & Denmark)
  • Efficient nations = industrious, scientific, rich
  • Empathetic = helpful, friendly (spain and italy)
  • Emotional = enjoying life, religious
19
Q

Who did a study into sex stereotypes?

A

Eagly and Steffen (1984)

20
Q

What was the findings of Eagly and Steffen (1984)

A

Found that regardless of gender, if youre a homemaker, youre seen as more feminine

21
Q

If a man is succesful at a task how is it seen differently to women?

A

If a man is succesful on a task, it is seen because they have higher ability and deserve recognition
If a women is succesful on a task, its seen because of luck, and less deserving of recognition

22
Q

Who did that study where it was shown that P’s had a subconcious prejudice? Their reactino times etc

A

Gaertner & Mclaughlin (1983)

23
Q

What did Gaertner & Mclaughlin (1983) show?

A

This study shows that p’s had an implicit
prejuudice (at a subconcious level)
The p’s didn’t describe black people in a
negative way, but just took longer to describe
them positively

24
Q

If someone is an old fashioned racist…..

A
  • They agree that it’s a bad idea for black and whites to marry one another
  • They don’t favour full racial integration
  • Agree that generally, black people are genearlly not as smart as whites
25
Q

If someone is a modern racist….

A

They agree that blacks are getting too demanding in their push for equal rights
They agree that over the past few years, the government and news media have shown more respect to blacks than they deserve

26
Q

Who did the study that showed how teachers give preferential treatment to ‘bloomers’?

A

Rosenthal & Jacobson (1968)

27
Q

Outline Rosenthal & Jacobson (1968)

A

Bloomers were more likely to improve
- teacher interacted with them more (to the detriment of others)
- teachers expectations affect learner behaviours
Pygmalion efffect
- self-fulfilling prophecy, fell in love with his own creations

28
Q

What are the benefits of stereotypes?

A
  • Help with reduction of social uncertainty (hogg, 2007) – preference for high entiativity groups when uncertainty is acute and enduring
  • Contribute to a positive sense of in-group identity (Hogg & Abrahams, 1988). -
    Self-enhancment (collective self-esteem – key motive in social identity contexts)
    Can justify the status quo (Jost & Banaji, 1994)