Lecture 18: Self II Flashcards

1
Q

How do we know who we are: other people

A
  • see ourselves through how people see us (Cooley)– their reactions can tell us who we are
  • social comparison theory:
    • learn about our own abilities by comparing ourselves to
      other people
    • theory revolves around 2 q’s:
      • when do you engage in social comparison?
      • who do you choose to compare yourself with?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

when do we engage in social comparison?

A
  • when theres no objective standard to measure yourself against– ex how much money should you donate to charity?
  • when you experience uncertainty about yourself in specific area– ex you got 15/20 on test= is this good?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

automaticity of social comparisons (who?)

A

gilbert, giesler, morris)

  • making social comparison might be: spontaneous, automatic process
  • means that we sometimes make social comparisons even if its inappropriate to do so= but we can undo them, if we have sufficient cog resources to do so
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who do we choose to compare ourselves to?

A

festinger
- we compare ourselves to people who are similar to ourselves
- because we’re motivated to see ourselves accurately
meta analysis of 55 studies
- ps preferred comparison targets who were better than they were on a particular dimension (average)= we try to understand the best we can be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

if you wanna know top level to which you can aspire, you engage in…
(if you wanna challenge yourself)

A

upward social comparison

= compare yourself to people who are BETTER than you are on a specific ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

if you wanna feel better about yourself, you engage in…

A

downward social comparison

= compare yourself to people who are WORSE than you on specific ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a self-motive?

A

tendency that is aimed towards establishing specific state of self-awareness, self-representation, or self-evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the types of self motives?

A
  • accuracy perception
  • self verification
  • self-enhancement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • accuracy perception
A

motivated to have accurate info about yourself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • self verification
A

motivated to confirm what we already know about yourself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  • self-enhancement
A

motivated to maintain positivity of self, desire to protect, enhance your self-image

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

demonstration of self-enhancement (5)

A
  • we’re better than average
  • we’re better toady than we were in past
  • we make biased attributions
  • engage in self-handicapping
  • sometimes sabotage other people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

self-enhancing social comparisons: better than average effect

A
  • we think we’re “better than average”
  • we think we’re above average on: getting along with others, happiness
  • people exaggerate their skills to think well of themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

self-enhancing comparisons: temporal self-comparisons

A
  • temporal self-appraised theory
  • past selves–> provide opportunity for downward comparison
  • ps–> randomly assigned to rate self or acquaintance:
    • or - traits (ex. socially skilled, self-confident vs. immature, narrow-minded)
  • now, and in past
  • results:
  • ratings of self and acquaintances in present and past:
  • past: Self= 5.8 Acq: 5.9
  • present: Self= 6.25 Acq: 5.91
  • show derogation of past for self, not acquaintances= self-enhancement
  • in your mind: everyone doesn’t get better, only me
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

biased attributions (who?)

A

Lau + Russell
- newspaper quotes from winners + losers
- coded player’s and manager’s explanations for outcome
results:
- % making internal attributions
- 80% of winners
- 53% of losers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

self-serving category definitions + trait definitions (who?)

A

Dunning
- self-enhancement motive can influence…how we define concepts
- we define categories + traits in self-serving ways
- if you’re always on time (your trait)= you tend to say: being dependable means being on time
- whatever we are: dependable, dutiful, obedient vs. thoughtful, loving, caring
= can fit to what YOU are= “what does it mean to be good son”

17
Q

self-handicapping

A
  • creating obstacles to success to protect self
  • avoid negative internal stuff
  • simply don’t try
  • don’t sleep / drink alcohol
  • ex. drink a lot before day of exam
  • in case you fail= you won’t feel bad about it, because you can blame it on the fact that you drank a lot
  • even if you did well on test= increases glory of success
  • win win situation
18
Q

experiment on proving automaticity of social comparison

A

Gilbert et al
- ps watched vid of model doing test
- model either performed poorly or well
- ps were told that model’s performance was staged= so not meaningful
- ps were made cognitively busy or not
- all ps did test= were given ambiguous feedback: 10/18
- ps rated their own competence at task
- when you’re cognitively busy= context of model’s performance not considered= so you tend to make automatic comparisons
- when you’re not busy= context taken into account= self-ratings are not sig influenced by model
= social comparison is automatic, but only when you’re under cognitive load– TAKES EFFORT to undo them– you can undo it when you’re not busy

19
Q

what decides when we are comparing ourselves to other people?

A

motive– depends on our motive

20
Q

self-handicapping experiment

A

Berglas + Jones