Lecture 14: Memory: Using it not Losing it Flashcards
What is contextual reinstatement in memory retrieval?
Reinstating part of a memory (e.g., context or details) can trigger recall of the rest.
How did Smith & Manzano (2010) study contextual reinstatement?
Participants watched videos and were tested with or without visual scene cues.
* Methodology: Free recall tasks showed enhanced memory when scene cues were reinstated.
What is the Encoding Specificity Principle?
Retrieval is better when cognitive processes at encoding match those during retrieval.
How did Godden & Baddeley (1975) demonstrate encoding specificity?
Participants studied and recalled words on land or underwater. Recall improved when environments matched.
* Methodology: Experimental manipulation of study and test environments.
How did Morris et al. (1977) explore encoding specificity?
Words encoded semantically were better recalled with semantic cues, while rhyme-encoded words were better recalled with rhyming cues.
* Methodology: Comparisons of semantic vs. rhyme-based encoding tasks.
What is the content-addressable memory model?
Memories are retrieved based on their content, not location (e.g., “birthday cake” triggers related memories).
What is the global matching model?
Retrieval reflects the match between cues and all stored memory traces.Clark & Gronlund (1996).
What is the complementary learning systems model?
Memory representations in the cortex are matched with partial cues, triggering pattern completion by the hippocampus.
McClelland et al. (1995).
* Methodology: Neurocomputational modeling.
How did Polyn et al. (2005) study episodic reinstatement?
Neural activity during recall matched activity during encoding, detected using machine learning on fMRI data.
* Methodology: fMRI with machine learning algorithms to identify patterns during recall.
What mechanisms explain the testing effect?
- Semantic Elaboration: Testing forms additional associations around studied material (e.g., “MOTHER” triggers related concepts like “CHILD”). Carpenter (2009).
- Episodic Context Updating: Testing integrates old and new contexts into memory, creating more cues.
Karpicke et al. (2014).
What is the testing effect?
Testing improves memory retention more effectively than re-studying.
How did Roediger & Karpicke (2006) demonstrate the testing effect?
Tested memory for prose passages over one week in three conditions: study-only (SSSS), study + test (SSST), and repeated tests (STTT).
* Methodology: Controlled study-testing experiments showed STTT resulted in the least forgetting (10%) compared to SSSS (52%).
How did Carpenter (2009) study semantic elaboration?
Testing enhanced memory through associative cues.
* Methodology: Recall tasks where test cues enriched memory connections.
How did Sekeres et al. (2016) study the impact of testing on forgetting?
Participants repeatedly recalled central and peripheral details of video clips over seven days.
* Methodology: Memory tests showed repeated testing reduced forgetting, especially for peripheral details.
What are some practical applications of the testing effect?
- Enhancing learning in educational settings.
- Improving eyewitness testimony recall using cognitive interviews.
- Developing mnemonic strategies with self-generated cues.