Lecture 10 - Cross Cultural Differences Flashcards
Define culture
No consensus definition
Define culture according to Rohner 1984
Highly variable systems of meaning
Learnt and shared by people from one generation to the next in an identifiable population
Define culture according to Hogg and Vaughan 2014
Expression group norms and values at national racial and ethnic level
Why is culture important
Human behaviour not exist in cultural vacuum
Provides context understanding development and behaviour
Existing research challenged universality of some prior findings
Define what cross cultural psychology is Berry et al 2011
Study of relationships between cultural context and human behaviour between cultures similarities against back drop of cultural differences
What is a WEIRD sample
Western Educated Industrialised Rich Democratic
What are Henrich Heine and Norenzayan 2010 sub definitions of WEIRD samples
96% samples in psych come from countries representing only 12% worlds population
80% relief college students
Randomly selected American UG 4000x more likely be a ppt than randomly selected person from country outside the west
Why does Henrich et al 2010 believe researchers use WEIRD samples
Researchers assume there is little variation across populations and standard subjects are representative of species
What did Henrich et al 2010 fine in actual fact of the representativeness of WEIRD samples
WEIRD samples are frequent outliers across wide range psychological domains
What is an example of a study showing WEIRD cross cultural issues
Fairness in economic decision making
—> the ultimatum game
What is the ultimatum game
Given sum money and decide how much allocate other person
Responder choose whether accept or not
If don’t accept both lose money
What are the typical offers accepted in the ultimatum game Henrich et al 2010
Typically £4-5 of the £10
Offering 40-50% accepted
Lower 30% rejected
What is the cross cultural issue with ultimatum game Henrich et al 2010
Not reflected in other countries
Some countries accept lower amount
Just reflecting western results
How does Hofsede 1980 investigate characterising cultures by values
Looked at work place culture
Questionnaire 117,000 managers of multinational companies
40 counties
Factor analysis
Dimensions characterised WHOLE cultures and societies
What factors did Hofstede 1980 look at in his factor analysis of work place culture
Power distance Uncertainty avoidance Masculinity- Femininity Individualism-Collectivism Time Perspective
What is power distance
How acceptable speak up and challenge boss
What is uncertainty avoidance
Extent which culture plans for stability and dealing with uncertainty
What is Masculinity-Femininity
What we value
Masculinity = achievement success wealth external
Femininity = interpersonal harmony relationships
What is individualism collectivism
Most widely used dimension
See identity product own internal attributes
Choices they make vs making themselves fit to social context
What is Time Perspective
Long term planning incorporating how overcome obstacles
Goal related planning
Added 1991
How can Great Britain be characterised according to Hoftese 1980
Individualistic
Concerned with material success
How can Denmark be characterised according to Hoftese 1980
Individualistic
Caring
Egalitarian (female)
How can Hong Kong be characterised according to Hoftese 1980
Accepting power hierarchies and collectivistic
Outline Markus and and Kitahamas 1991 Self Construal Theory to characterise people within cultures
Individualistic-Collectivist dimension measured at individual level
Independent Self Construal
Interdependent Self construal
What is Interdependent Self Construal
Persons identity intertwined with others and defined by those relationships
More permeable boundaries. Identities more fluent depending who with and cultures
What is Independent Self Construal
Persons identity product stable internal traits and separate and unique from others
Outline Cross, Hardin and Gercek Swing 2011 criticism of Markus and Kitayamas 1991 Self Construal Theory
Women western societies more likely than men to define themselves terms their relationships
Relational Self Construal - individual difference extent which people define themselves reference close personal relationships
Not about group memberships or social roles