Lecture 10 Flashcards
Decisions
-making choices between alternatives
—ex. Which college to attend
Reasoning
-thought process that yields a conclusion from premises
—percepts, thoughts or assertions
-reasoning often leads to decisions
—also involved in other situations too
—problem solving and reading
Deductive reasoning
We can make definite conclusions from sequences of statements
Syllogisms
-consist of 2 premises and a conclusion
—each premise specifies a relationship between 2 categories (categorical syllogisms)
Validity
-a syllogism is valid when it’s conclusions follow logically
—depends on the form of syllogism
Truth
Refers to content of the 2 premises
-premises must be evaluated to determine whether they are consistent with the facts
4 types of categorical syllogisms
- Universal affirmative
-all A are B - Universal negative
-no A are B - Particular affirmative
-some A are B - Particular negative
-some A are not B
Quantifies
Ex. every, all, one, some
-semantic scope ambiguity
—every student speaks 2 languages
-influence of world knowledge
—every hundred killed a duck (different ducks)
-continuations resolve scope, sometimes creating humour
—every 15 seconds a man is arrested in the US, poor guy!
Logicism
-belief that logical reasoning is an essential part of human nature
—practical syllogisms have 2 premises that point to a conclusion that calls for action
Conditional syllogism
1st premise has form “if. . ,then. . .”
-if is the antecedent
-then Is the consequent
Watson card selection task
-4-card problem based on conditional reasoning
-participants need to choose cards that disconfirm the rule
—falsification principle: to test a rule, it is necessary to look for situations that would falsify the rule
Inductive reasoning
-we arrive at conclusions about what is probably true based on evidence
—we make probable conclusions that are suggested with varying degrees of certainty
-premises are based on observation of one or more specific cases
—we generalize from these cases to a more general conclusion
In evaluating inductive arguments, we decide how strong the argument is based on. . .
- Representativeness of observations
- Number of observations
- Quality of the evidence
Heuristics
-when we are forced to go beyond given info and make judgments between possible, often uncertain outcomes
—when we use past experiences to guide present behavior, we use shortcuts to reach conclusions rapidly
—may work in some situations, but may mislead us in others
Availability heuristics
-events that are easily remembered are judged as being more probable than events that are less easily remembered